- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
- Messages
- 94,343
- Reaction score
- 82,725
- Location
- Barsoom
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
New Pennsylvania congressional map erases 1,100 miles of district borders
Well done.
Every state should have its district maps analyzed and redrawn to minimize the engineered advantages of partisan gerrymandering.
By Christopher Ingraham
February 20, 2018
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has drawn a new congressional district map for the state after finding that the previous map, drawn by Republicans following the 2010 Census, was an illegal gerrymander that deprived the state's voters of their right to participate in free and equal elections. One of the criteria used by the court in drawing the new districts is “compactness.” This means, in short, that wherever possible districts should avoid the sprawling, winding, inkblot-like shapes that characterized the old Pennsylvania map, and gerrymandered maps in a number of other states, as well. A Washington Post analysis shows that the court-drawn map is indeed considerably more compact than the Republican-drawn version, eliminating more than 1,100 miles of borders drawn by Republicans to give themselves a partisan advantage. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has drawn a new congressional district map for the state after finding that the previous map, drawn by Republicans following the 2010 Census, was an illegal gerrymander that deprived the state's voters of their right to participate in free and equal elections.
One of the criteria used by the court in drawing the new districts is “compactness.” This means, in short, that wherever possible districts should avoid the sprawling, winding, inkblot-like shapes that characterized the old Pennsylvania map, and gerrymandered maps in a number of other states, as well. A Washington Post analysis shows that the court-drawn map is indeed considerably more compact than the Republican-drawn version, eliminating more than 1,100 miles of borders drawn by Republicans to give themselves a partisan advantage. Redistricting experts have a lot of ways to objectively measure compactness, using geometric qualities like district area, perimeter and so on. From a redistricting standpoint, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court removed 1,139 miles of unnecessary divisions between and within communities of Pennsylvania voters, divisions that Republican lawmakers put in place primarily to give themselves a political advantage over their Democratic opponents. The new, court-drawn map is not only more compact than either Republican offering — but it also splits up fewer counties and municipal areas, it and more closely reflects the total partisan divide of the state. The state's Republican leaders, for their part, have vowed to challenge the new state court-drawn map in federal court.
Well done.
Every state should have its district maps analyzed and redrawn to minimize the engineered advantages of partisan gerrymandering.