- Joined
- Feb 3, 2010
- Messages
- 16,559
- Reaction score
- 10,793
- Location
- Louisiana
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
I was looking around for some links about some of the problems with muellers reputation that I have read in the past when I came across this OP ed from the Washington times. It sums up my position really well.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jul/4/robert-muellers-bias-will-affect-his-investigation/
He goes on in the article to explain the same backlash that I see occurring from each possible conclusion and recommends Mueller be removed for the same reason I think he needs to be replaced. He tainted his own investigation by making poor choices when he assembled his team.
Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
Your claim is that if someone donates to a politician that they can't investigate anyone on the other side. That's idiotic. These people do this for a living. Everything they do has to go through the deputy attorney general and through one of the most respected officials in washington (Mueller). To claim this is a witch hunt as people are doing is an incredibly obvious lie.