• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Russian Collusion Evidence

NeverTrump

NeverTrump

Exposing GOP since 2015
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
25,357
Reaction score
11,557
Location
Post-Trump America
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
Since people always ask about the evidence of such collusion here it is:

  • The Trump campaign's contact with Wikileaks by proxy of Russia is now well documented.
  • The defense for Trump allies has been "I do not recall." Do you really expect us to believe that the Trump administration was too stupid to participate in such activity or really didn't know?
  • Follow the money & the tweets! That tweet being Trump Jr.'s stupid tweet which revealed he was seeking out DNC hacked emails.
  • Mueller has requested a trove of documents with Russia related search terms in them from the campaign. Why would he ask for these if they didn't exist?
  • So far, about 9 campaign people have had involvement with upwards of 20 Russians and literally no other foreign government during the 2016 election.
  • With no evidence Trump believes Putin, "Every time he sees him." How often is that Mr. President?
  • Trump says, Believe him, he had nothing to do with Russia. Why should we believe a liar?


On top of direct Russian collusion that is coming to light. There is also indirect Russian collusion in which the Russians used social media to divide and conquer politics not only in this country, but around the world!
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
Since people always ask about the evidence of such collusion here it is:

  • The Trump campaign's contact with Wikileaks by proxy of Russia is now well documented.
  • The defense for Trump allies has been "I do not recall." Do you really expect us to believe that the Trump administration was too stupid to participate in such activity or really didn't know?
  • Follow the money & the tweets! That tweet being Trump Jr.'s stupid tweet which revealed he was seeking out DNC hacked emails.
  • Mueller has requested a trove of documents with Russia related search terms in them from the campaign. Why would he ask for these if they didn't exist?
  • So far, about 9 campaign people have had involvement with upwards of 20 Russians and literally no other foreign government during the 2016 election.
  • With no evidence Trump believes Putin, "Every time he sees him." How often is that Mr. President?
  • Trump says, Believe him, he had nothing to do with Russia. Why should we believe a liar?


On top of direct Russian collusion that is coming to light. There is also indirect Russian collusion in which the Russians used social media to divide and conquer politics not only in this country, but around the world!
Click to expand...

So...essentially no real evidence.

Based on those "clues," my guess would be Colonel Mustard with the candlestick in the Library.

Thanks. :)
 
Last edited:
Captain Adverse said:
So...essentially no real evidence.

Based on those "clues," my guess would be Colonel Mustard with the candlestick in the Library.

Thanks. :)
Click to expand...

Damn it, I had Prof Plum with the revolver in the kitchen.
 
Its probably lost on you how stupid you look declaring you are going to present proof and then completely failing in providing proof. But then...you dont need proof, do you. All you need is that hatred that has consumed you.
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
Since people always ask about the evidence of such collusion here it is:

  • The Trump campaign's contact with Wikileaks by proxy of Russia is now well documented.
  • The defense for Trump allies has been "I do not recall." Do you really expect us to believe that the Trump administration was too stupid to participate in such activity or really didn't know?
  • Follow the money & the tweets! That tweet being Trump Jr.'s stupid tweet which revealed he was seeking out DNC hacked emails.
  • Mueller has requested a trove of documents with Russia related search terms in them from the campaign. Why would he ask for these if they didn't exist?
  • So far, about 9 campaign people have had involvement with upwards of 20 Russians and literally no other foreign government during the 2016 election.
  • With no evidence Trump believes Putin, "Every time he sees him." How often is that Mr. President?
  • Trump says, Believe him, he had nothing to do with Russia. Why should we believe a liar?


On top of direct Russian collusion that is coming to light. There is also indirect Russian collusion in which the Russians used social media to divide and conquer politics not only in this country, but around the world!
Click to expand...

Alright, I am going to point this out to you.

Only a possible two of those are not speculation.

Yes Trumps people in the republican team had contact with the Russians. But so did the democrats, and they were even using them to get harmful information that they could use on Trump. Information that turned out to be entirely falsified, but then again I would only chalk that up to the Trump team being better at their jobs.

Hell, the rest of all this can't even be considered evidence.
There is so much speculation in this list, I would have better chances rolling a magic, and asking it how to kill a baby...

The funny part, is when you shake it. The ball returns with the answer (just like that). ;)
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
Since people always ask about the evidence of such collusion here it is:

  • The Trump campaign's contact with Wikileaks by proxy of Russia is now well documented.
  • The defense for Trump allies has been "I do not recall." Do you really expect us to believe that the Trump administration was too stupid to participate in such activity or really didn't know?
  • Follow the money & the tweets! That tweet being Trump Jr.'s stupid tweet which revealed he was seeking out DNC hacked emails.
  • Mueller has requested a trove of documents with Russia related search terms in them from the campaign. Why would he ask for these if they didn't exist?
  • So far, about 9 campaign people have had involvement with upwards of 20 Russians and literally no other foreign government during the 2016 election.
  • With no evidence Trump believes Putin, "Every time he sees him." How often is that Mr. President?
  • Trump says, Believe him, he had nothing to do with Russia. Why should we believe a liar?


On top of direct Russian collusion that is coming to light. There is also indirect Russian collusion in which the Russians used social media to divide and conquer politics not only in this country, but around the world!
Click to expand...
The 'collusion' wasn't between Trump and Russia, it was between Trump campaign officials and Wikileaks. There is no doubt in my mind that the Trump campaign was fully aware of the efforts Russia was taking to influence public opinion here in America, and they were aware hacked material was in the pipeline for Wikileaks to release on their behalf. That's why after Trumps Access Hollywood tape was released, Wikileaks decided to do an email dump that Stone mysteriously was able to predict the contents of.

How much of a crime that is or isn't depends totally how involved they were, and proving it. Being party to something like that during an election could very well be criminal conspiracy and a violation of the federal campaign election act. Then again, talking to Wikileaks during the election isn't a crime -- nor should it be.
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
Since people always ask about the evidence of such collusion here it is:

  • The Trump campaign's contact with Wikileaks by proxy of Russia is now well documented.
  • The defense for Trump allies has been "I do not recall." Do you really expect us to believe that the Trump administration was too stupid to participate in such activity or really didn't know?
  • Follow the money & the tweets! That tweet being Trump Jr.'s stupid tweet which revealed he was seeking out DNC hacked emails.
  • Mueller has requested a trove of documents with Russia related search terms in them from the campaign. Why would he ask for these if they didn't exist?
  • So far, about 9 campaign people have had involvement with upwards of 20 Russians and literally no other foreign government during the 2016 election.
  • With no evidence Trump believes Putin, "Every time he sees him." How often is that Mr. President?
  • Trump says, Believe him, he had nothing to do with Russia. Why should we believe a liar?


On top of direct Russian collusion that is coming to light. There is also indirect Russian collusion in which the Russians used social media to divide and conquer politics not only in this country, but around the world!
Click to expand...


Where are the charges stemming from all this "real evidence?"
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
Since people always ask about the evidence of such collusion here it is:

  • The Trump campaign's contact with Wikileaks by proxy of Russia is now well documented.
  • The defense for Trump allies has been "I do not recall." Do you really expect us to believe that the Trump administration was too stupid to participate in such activity or really didn't know?
  • Follow the money & the tweets! That tweet being Trump Jr.'s stupid tweet which revealed he was seeking out DNC hacked emails.
  • Mueller has requested a trove of documents with Russia related search terms in them from the campaign. Why would he ask for these if they didn't exist?
  • So far, about 9 campaign people have had involvement with upwards of 20 Russians and literally no other foreign government during the 2016 election.
  • With no evidence Trump believes Putin, "Every time he sees him." How often is that Mr. President?
  • Trump says, Believe him, he had nothing to do with Russia. Why should we believe a liar?


On top of direct Russian collusion that is coming to light. There is also indirect Russian collusion in which the Russians used social media to divide and conquer politics not only in this country, but around the world!
Click to expand...

Correct me if I'm wrong, but with six degrees of separation, almost everyone knows everyone, right?

Do you have any evidence that has no degrees of separation?

I didn't think so...

This is another worthless thread, that for now, is nothing but slander.
 
RetiredUSN said:
You hired the wrong detective.

I can give you this guy's number.

View attachment 67225152
Click to expand...

I raise yo with this:

go_go_gadget_homeless_by_valashard-d4r3qlo.jpg
 
Oborosen said:
Alright, I am going to point this out to you.

Only a possible two of those are not speculation.

Yes Trumps people in the republican team had contact with the Russians. But so did the democrats, and they were even using them to get harmful information that they could use on Trump. Information that turned out to be entirely falsified, but then again I would only chalk that up to the Trump team being better at their jobs.

Hell, the rest of all this can't even be considered evidence.
There is so much speculation in this list, I would have better chances rolling a magic, and asking it how to kill a baby...

The funny part, is when you shake it. The ball returns with the answer (just like that). ;)
Click to expand...

Please cite whatever source you have that Democrats colluded directly with Russia to get harmful info on Trump. I don't think you are lying, I think you are confused and misinformed, but I would like to see where you got this information.
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
Since people always ask about the evidence of such collusion here it is:

  • The Trump campaign's contact with Wikileaks by proxy of Russia is now well documented.
  • The defense for Trump allies has been "I do not recall." Do you really expect us to believe that the Trump administration was too stupid to participate in such activity or really didn't know?
  • Follow the money & the tweets! That tweet being Trump Jr.'s stupid tweet which revealed he was seeking out DNC hacked emails.
  • Mueller has requested a trove of documents with Russia related search terms in them from the campaign. Why would he ask for these if they didn't exist?
  • So far, about 9 campaign people have had involvement with upwards of 20 Russians and literally no other foreign government during the 2016 election.
  • With no evidence Trump believes Putin, "Every time he sees him." How often is that Mr. President?
  • Trump says, Believe him, he had nothing to do with Russia. Why should we believe a liar?


On top of direct Russian collusion that is coming to light. There is also indirect Russian collusion in which the Russians used social media to divide and conquer politics not only in this country, but around the world!
Click to expand...

You have answered your own question and you are wrong. There is no eveidence.

"With no evidence Trump believes Putin, "Every time he sees him." How often is that Mr. President?"
/
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
Since people always ask about the evidence of such collusion here it is:

  • The Trump campaign's contact with Wikileaks by proxy of Russia is now well documented.
  • The defense for Trump allies has been "I do not recall." Do you really expect us to believe that the Trump administration was too stupid to participate in such activity or really didn't know?
  • Follow the money & the tweets! That tweet being Trump Jr.'s stupid tweet which revealed he was seeking out DNC hacked emails.
  • Mueller has requested a trove of documents with Russia related search terms in them from the campaign. Why would he ask for these if they didn't exist?
  • So far, about 9 campaign people have had involvement with upwards of 20 Russians and literally no other foreign government during the 2016 election.
  • With no evidence Trump believes Putin, "Every time he sees him." How often is that Mr. President?
  • Trump says, Believe him, he had nothing to do with Russia. Why should we believe a liar?


On top of direct Russian collusion that is coming to light. There is also indirect Russian collusion in which the Russians used social media to divide and conquer politics not only in this country, but around the world!
Click to expand...




You don't know what "evidence" is, do you?



Kudos for trying though, most of your ilk don't even go that far. :thumbs:
 
Captain Adverse said:
So...essentially no real evidence.

Based on those "clues," my guess would be Colonel Mustard with the candlestick in the Library.

Thanks. :)
Click to expand...

OK then. What would be evidence in your mind. I have asked this question before and it's usually an even vaguer response than this evidence.
 
CriticalThought said:
Please cite whatever source you have that Democrats colluded directly with Russia to get harmful info on Trump. I don't think you are lying, I think you are confused and misinformed, but I would like to see where you got this information.
Click to expand...




The Dossier for one, where they used thier lawyers to hire a firm already doing opposition research who hired steele to talk to russians to get wierd and odd dirt on trump.

Fox's Wallace: More evidence of Dem collusion with Russia than GOP | TheHill
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
Please enlighten me!
Click to expand...




evidence, such as the proof the hillary campaign paid for the dossier on trump by using a company that hired a british foreigner to go to russian foriegners to dig up dirt on trump.


We have the dossier, we have the payment trail, and we have testimony.



That's all "evidence"


clue: if your evidence starts with or could start with "I feel", it's not.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
evidence, such as the proof the hillary campaign paid for the dossier on trump by using a company that hired a british foreigner to go to russian foriegners to dig up dirt on trump.


We have the dossier, we have the payment trail, and we have testimony.



That's all "evidence"


clue: if your evidence starts with or could start with "I feel", it's not.
Click to expand...

Uh I asked for what evidence you would need to have you believe that Trump colluded with Russia. I guess by this response your answer is none! You will believe Trump no matter what.
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
Uh I asked for what evidence you would need to have you believe that Trump colluded with Russia. I guess by this response your answer is none! You will believe Trump no matter what.
Click to expand...



I would need evidence that trump directed people to contact russians in an effort to have them set up fake ****, and other schemes to defraud the american public of an honest and fair election as well as what law was broken. title and code.



Another example of evidence. The email where hillary instructed her aide to strip classification headers on a fax and send it in an unsecure email. That email, is evidence of hillary instructing her aide to commit a felony under 18 U.S. Code § 798.

Here is the e-mail chain:

2FED92FE00000578-3391031-image-a-63_1452287824741.jpg

It's a crime, if it has headers that say classified, no matter what it is, it is a crime to send it unsecure.


see we have the document, and the law that was broken, not only have I given you actual evidence, here is some more.




Email%205%20-%20Hillary%20orders%20Sullivan%20to%20email%20classified%20info.png




What we have here now is a pattern of violating the law. This is what they call in police work, "evidence".
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
I would need evidence that trump directed people to contact russians in an effort to have them set up fake ****, and other schemes to defraud the american public of an honest and fair election as well as what law was broken. title and code.
Click to expand...

So why isn't having meetings with 20 Russians good enough? Or Trump Jr.'s emails with Wikileaks seeking out dirt on Hillary Clinton? Most if not all campaigns have done oppo research without contacting Russia.
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
So why isn't having meetings with 20 Russians good enough? Or Trump Jr.'s emails with Wikileaks seeking out dirt on Hillary Clinton? Most if not all campaigns have done oppo research without contacting Russia.
Click to expand...



Trump had a meeting, or directed people to have a meeting with 20 russians?

where is the evidences of this?



Let me show you again. Here is evidence Obama colluded with Russians:




by your bar you set, Obama is just as involved with russian collusion as trump.


And as far as "opp research without meeting the russians"?

Fusion GPS official met with Russian operative before and after Trump Jr. sit-down | Fox News

DNC and hillary campaign's paid op research group met with russians both before and after jr sit down. How is this not collusion, but trump jr's is?
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
Trump had a meeting, or directed people to have a meeting with 20 russians?

DNC and hillary campaign's paid op research group met with russians both before and after jr sit down. How is this not collusion, but trump jr's is?
Click to expand...

More than 9 people in his campaign have had meetings where at least 20 Russians were involved. This is all documented.

The problem you and your CT's have if this is true is that the Trump dossier was not used as any political attack during the campaign and mostly dismissed by all experts. So Hillary Clinton is once again really bad at controlling things/winning.

So again, why is Trump JR emails with Wikileaks not evidence of collusion? You have done everything you can to avoid answering this question by inserting silly deflections into this thread.

But it's nice seeing that you watch RT. :lamo
 
Last edited:
NeverTrumpGOP said:
More than 9 people in his campaign have had meetings where at least 20 Russians were involved. This is all documented.
Click to expand...



So no, you don't have evidence that this was directed by trump or his campaign, just that people in the campaign met with "20 russians"?

Kremlin spokesman: Russian ambassador met with advisers to Clinton campaign too | TheHill
Did the Clinton campaign collude with Ukraine? (slate making excuses for hillary)
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...f-seems-like-clinton-one-colluding/811243001/


But let me ask you, what was the purpose of these meetings, and what was the crime committed? Who has been charged for what crimes in relation to collusion?


The problem you and your CT's have if this is true is that the Trump dossier was not used as any political attack during the campaign and mostly dismissed by all experts. So Hillary Clinton is once again really bad at controlling things/winning.
Click to expand...


CT? I don't know what you mean. The dossier was put forth by cnn's buzzfeed, then CNN who then denied they did. The dossier got a second life recently before the revelation that hillary and the DNC paid for it.


That's evidence, actual evidence.

So again, why is Trump JR emails with Wikileaks not evidence of collusion? You have done everything you can to avoid answering this question by inserting silly deflections into this thread.
Click to expand...

Collusion with who? How is this collusion. you say "what about wiki leaks", then "why wont you answer". Tell me specifically what your issue is with jr's email responses (3 i believe), with wiki leaks and how that is evidence of collusion, and with who. thanks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom