• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Russian Collusion Evidence

VanceMack said:
The DNC has been proven to have had FAR MORE contact and collusion...and yet you ignore it.

You are sadly transparent and transparently sad.
Click to expand...

One way mirrors...
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
Since people always ask about the evidence of such collusion here it is:

  • The Trump campaign's contact with Wikileaks by proxy of Russia is now well documented.
  • The defense for Trump allies has been "I do not recall." Do you really expect us to believe that the Trump administration was too stupid to participate in such activity or really didn't know?
  • Follow the money & the tweets! That tweet being Trump Jr.'s stupid tweet which revealed he was seeking out DNC hacked emails.
  • Mueller has requested a trove of documents with Russia related search terms in them from the campaign. Why would he ask for these if they didn't exist?
  • So far, about 9 campaign people have had involvement with upwards of 20 Russians and literally no other foreign government during the 2016 election.
  • With no evidence Trump believes Putin, "Every time he sees him." How often is that Mr. President?
  • Trump says, Believe him, he had nothing to do with Russia. Why should we believe a liar?


On top of direct Russian collusion that is coming to light. There is also indirect Russian collusion in which the Russians used social media to divide and conquer politics not only in this country, but around the world!
Click to expand...

Thanks for your opinions MR. Mueller. However, all you've got is a bunch of garbage and no facts that would convict anyone in a court.
 
Johnson said:
So they hired someone who hired someone who hired someone who used an already existing dossier? How dastardly.
Click to expand...



Dossier did not already exist, they hired lawyers to hire the firm to create a client attorney privilege scenario when they hired the company who used british guy to get info from russian guys to create rediculous dossier.


they shopped foreigners for information, the **** you guys are all uspet about allegedy happening by trump.
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
was he a part of the campaign? Did he want his father to win? :roll:
Click to expand...




he was asked if he wanted some ****, he said, "no". you would have to prove that trump directed him to collude with the russians, then show successful collusion. you would then have to show what law was broken.


thus far you have been unable to show this. This is where you fail due to lack of evidence.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
he was asked if he wanted some ****, he said, "no". you would have to prove that trump directed him to collude with the russians, then show successful collusion. you would then have to show what law was broken.

thus far you have been unable to show this. This is where you fail due to lack of evidence.
Click to expand...

But he was open to meeting with the Russians (and he did) to collude about Hillary Clinton and to try to take her down.
 
Wrong section. This thread has to go under Conspiracy Theories.
 
Herkamer63 said:
Wrong section. This thread has to go under Conspiracy Theories.
Click to expand...

Any thread that asks "why would he do that unless he...." is probably a conspiracy theory.
 
CriticalThought said:
Please cite whatever source you have that Democrats colluded directly with Russia to get harmful info on Trump. I don't think you are lying, I think you are confused and misinformed, but I would like to see where you got this information.
Click to expand...

It was originally the Fusion GPS hiccup they had.
Steele Dossier & Democrats? Collusion with Russia | National Review

In any event, you can see the problem here for Democrats who, for a year, have chanted the “Trump campaign collusion with Russia” mantra. Strip away the buffers (i.e., Steele and Perkins Coie) and the dossier is an exercise in Clinton-campaign collusion with Kremlin-connected sources to produce information that would cripple the Trump campaign and, failing that, undermine the Trump presidency.
Click to expand...
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
Since people always ask about the evidence of such collusion here it is:

  • The Trump campaign's contact with Wikileaks by proxy of Russia is now well documented.
  • The defense for Trump allies has been "I do not recall." Do you really expect us to believe that the Trump administration was too stupid to participate in such activity or really didn't know?
  • Follow the money & the tweets! That tweet being Trump Jr.'s stupid tweet which revealed he was seeking out DNC hacked emails.
  • Mueller has requested a trove of documents with Russia related search terms in them from the campaign. Why would he ask for these if they didn't exist?
  • So far, about 9 campaign people have had involvement with upwards of 20 Russians and literally no other foreign government during the 2016 election.
  • With no evidence Trump believes Putin, "Every time he sees him." How often is that Mr. President?
  • Trump says, Believe him, he had nothing to do with Russia. Why should we believe a liar?


On top of direct Russian collusion that is coming to light. There is also indirect Russian collusion in which the Russians used social media to divide and conquer politics not only in this country, but around the world!
Click to expand...

Flynn has probably flipped, explains why things have been quiet. Mueller will probably have some Trump family indictments the Trumps can put under the tree.
 
The Russia Scandal Just Got Much Worse …....................... For Hillary Clinton And Barack Obama

Shortly after the Uranium One story broke, various news reports claimed that it was much ado about nothing. But a review of a huge cache of newly available documents shows that, if anything, it was worse than previously thought.

The Hill broke the bombshell story last month, which summed up goes like this: While the Obama administration was approving the controversial 2010 sale of Uranium One to a state-owned Russian energy giant — which gave it control of one-fifth of U.S. uranium supplies — the FBI was actively investigating that company for extensive criminal activity designed to expand Russia's footprint in the U.S. uranium business.

This raised questions about who in the Obama administration was aware of the FBI's evidence — which included bribery, extortion and racketeering — before greenlighting the sale. Officials involved denied knowing anything about the investigation at the time.

Now a cache of documents 5,000 pages long, which were reviewed by The Hill, sheds new and more troubling light on this story.

The documents detail work done by undercover informant Douglas Campbell, who was paid nearly $200,000 for his cooperation with the FBI while he was working as a lobbyist on behalf of a Russian company. The Justice Department had previously barred Campbell from telling anyone about his work, a gag order it lifted only after the initial Hill story ran.

Among the revelations contained in these documents:
Campbell had documented a bribery/kickback scheme by Russian officials in the U.S. more than a year before Obama approved the Uranium One sale.
He also "relayed detailed information about criminal conduct throughout 2010."
Campbell was directly solicited by Russian officials to help overcome political opposition from Republicans to the Uranium One sale.
He regularly told his FBI handlers about what The Hill describes only as a "Washington entity with close ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton," which was paid millions to help expand Russia's U.S. uranium business and "began increasing its financial support" to the Clinton Foundation.
Russia saw the Uranium One purchase as part of a long-term strategy to dominate energy markets and make the U.S. more dependent on Russia's nuclear fuel.
Russians used "racially tinged insults to boast about how easy they found it to win uranium business under Obama."

It's important to note that all this transpired while Obama was embarking on his ill-fated Russian "reset" — in which he tried to make nice with Russia, and during which his administration not only approved the Uranium One sale but made other rulings favorable to Russian energy interests.

Adding further intrigue to the story is the fact that not only did the FBI keep a lid on its investigation for years, officials at Justice tried to downplay Campbell's significance as an informant and dispute that he had any information about the Uranium One deal after the initial story broke last month. As The Hill notes, the documents it reviewed directly contradict those claims.

One can only speculate why Justice officials would be doing this now.

Despite its potentially far-reaching ramifications, the Uranium One story has so far barely registered with the public, thanks to a near total news blackout from the mainstream press.
Click to expand...

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/russia-scandal-uranium-one-clinton-foundation/
 
Oborosen said:
It was originally the Fusion GPS hiccup they had.
Steele Dossier & Democrats? Collusion with Russia | National Review
Click to expand...
What's interesting is that many elements (not all) of the dossier have turned out to be true.

Carter Page DID take several trips to Moscow, he DID discuss a deal to broker the sale of 19% of Rosneft, and he DID disclose that to team Trump.

That alone is a major revelation, as it both corroborates at least part of the Steele report, and offers an insight into the odd coincidence that Tillerson (than man who oversaw the deal between Exxon and Rosneft) was chosen as secretary of state.
 
:popcorn2:

 
ReverendHellh0und said:
So no, you don't have evidence that this was directed by trump or his campaign, just that people in the campaign met with "20 russians"?

Kremlin spokesman: Russian ambassador met with advisers to Clinton campaign too | TheHill
Did the Clinton campaign collude with Ukraine? (slate making excuses for hillary)
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...f-seems-like-clinton-one-colluding/811243001/


But let me ask you, what was the purpose of these meetings, and what was the crime committed? Who has been charged for what crimes in relation to collusion?





CT? I don't know what you mean. The dossier was put forth by cnn's buzzfeed, then CNN who then denied they did. The dossier got a second life recently before the revelation that hillary and the DNC paid for it.


That's evidence, actual evidence.



Collusion with who? How is this collusion. you say "what about wiki leaks", then "why wont you answer". Tell me specifically what your issue is with jr's email responses (3 i believe), with wiki leaks and how that is evidence of collusion, and with who. thanks
Click to expand...

Wow clutch, clutch, clutching at straws...
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
Since people always ask about the evidence of such collusion here it is:

  • The Trump campaign's contact with Wikileaks by proxy of Russia is now well documented.
  • The defense for Trump allies has been "I do not recall." Do you really expect us to believe that the Trump administration was too stupid to participate in such activity or really didn't know?
  • Follow the money & the tweets! That tweet being Trump Jr.'s stupid tweet which revealed he was seeking out DNC hacked emails.
  • Mueller has requested a trove of documents with Russia related search terms in them from the campaign. Why would he ask for these if they didn't exist?
  • So far, about 9 campaign people have had involvement with upwards of 20 Russians and literally no other foreign government during the 2016 election.
  • With no evidence Trump believes Putin, "Every time he sees him." How often is that Mr. President?
  • Trump says, Believe him, he had nothing to do with Russia. Why should we believe a liar?


On top of direct Russian collusion that is coming to light. There is also indirect Russian collusion in which the Russians used social media to divide and conquer politics not only in this country, but around the world!
Click to expand...

You said a-lot ,but lip service is all you have still, were is that proof. Also don’t forget Facebook sold adds to Russia, and it was against Trump. Stop cheery picking.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
MovingPictures said:
The 'collusion' wasn't between Trump and Russia, it was between Trump campaign officials and Wikileaks. There is no doubt in my mind that the Trump campaign was fully aware of the efforts Russia was taking to influence public opinion here in America, and they were aware hacked material was in the pipeline for Wikileaks to release on their behalf. That's why after Trumps Access Hollywood tape was released, Wikileaks decided to do an email dump that Stone mysteriously was able to predict the contents of.

How much of a crime that is or isn't depends totally how involved they were, and proving it. Being party to something like that during an election could very well be criminal conspiracy and a violation of the federal campaign election act. Then again, talking to Wikileaks during the election isn't a crime -- nor should it be.
Click to expand...

Democrats paid for a fake dossier on Trump from Russia, and it doesn’t look like that bothers you.
Wikileaks leaked real emails that showed the world the democrats cheated.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
MrShangles said:
You said a-lot ,but lip service is all you have still, were is that proof. Also don’t forget Facebook sold adds to Russia, and it was against Trump. Stop cheery picking.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

There is lots of proof that trumps team "forgot" foreign contacts, the memory loss seems to only apply to Russian contacts hmmm. No amount of proof would be enough for the Adorables to give up there emotional and cult devotion to a reality TV buffoon, HAPPY HOLIDAYS !!

PS. Mueller has a Xmas indictment for someone in the trump FAMILY:2wave:
 
yankintx said:
No matter the deflect, Mueller is still there, going thru Trumps finances. Im sure the adorables have nothing to worry about if Don has been honest bwahaha
Click to expand...

No deflection: the thread title is Russian Collusion Evidence, not Trump's Russian Collusion. Going on the generic phrasing of the title I added to show that there is more than one charge of collusion with Russians currently going on. Fear not, the Trump bashing will continue unfettered.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom