- Joined
- May 6, 2013
- Messages
- 55,632
- Reaction score
- 40,054
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
:lamo
Yeah, that was good. He almost had me there, then I realized who he was channeling.
:lamo
well why did LBJ and his huge majority on congress keep drugs illegal
I grew up in the 60s,LBJ was president until I was 10 or so and drugs were federally banned when I was that age
I knew there was a reason why I blocked his posts.
Liberals are soft on crime, and...... soft on absolutely everything. In the 18th Century you got hung for stealing a horse and a month in prison for kissing your wife in public on Sunday, and, surprise, Americans were not criminals.
Today we have 5% of the world's population and 25% of the entire world's prisoners. Why? Because liberal's have been soft on crime and even softer on individual responsibility arguing, in typical Marxist fashion, that society is responsible for their crimes.
Wait...a lot of people are in prison because liberals are soft on crime?
you mean people who think a stoned population is a bad idea while the Chinese are working 80 hour weeks and growing at 7% a year?The drug war is only supported by social conservatives.
I don't agree. gun issues are far more partisan. Almost every anti gun poster and politician in the USA is a liberal. There are many many right wingers-usually those who are libertarian or agnostic on social issues who are against the war on drugs. Lots of black politicians who are democrats are vehement in their hatred of drugs. I can tell you that the judges most likely to really hammer black drug dealers-at least in the courts I tried cases in, were black judges.
This makes no sense to me. The number of Americans who want guns banned is way down from, say, the early 90s. Yet we're far more partisan now.
In my opinion, older, rural white Americans have become angry and hyper partisan in response to the years Democrats controlled congress and/or the White House. They feel marginalized because Americans are becoming less religious and there is more diversity in our population. Their turn to the hard right has made a lot of liberals turn further to the left. There's no one issue that explains the divide between Americans. Those who see gun laws as the primary factor probably are or are close to one issue voters or guns play an unusually large role in their life (unusual being subjective, but I think you'd agree that, for instance, guns play a huge role in your life in comparison to the vast majority of Americans)
This makes no sense to me. The number of Americans who want guns banned is way down from, say, the early 90s. Yet we're far more partisan now.
In my opinion, older, rural white Americans have become angry and hyper partisan in response to the years Democrats controlled congress and/or the White House. They feel marginalized because Americans are becoming less religious and there is more diversity in our population. Their turn to the hard right has made a lot of liberals turn further to the left. There's no one issue that explains the divide between Americans. Those who see gun laws as the primary factor probably are or are close to one issue voters or guns play an unusually large role in their life (unusual being subjective, but I think you'd agree that, for instance, guns play a huge role in your life in comparison to the vast majority of Americans)
Liberals are soft on crime, and...... soft on absolutely everything. In the 18th Century you got hung for stealing a horse and a month in prison for kissing your wife in public on Sunday, and, surprise, Americans were not criminals.
Today we have 5% of the world's population and 25% of the entire world's prisoners. Why? Because liberal's have been soft on crime and even softer on individual responsibility arguing, in typical Marxist fashion, that society is responsible for their crimes.
1) liberal policies drove crime way up so people want guns now
2) the bigger liberal govt grows the more people appreciate why our conservative Founders gave us guns ie to protect ourselves from liberal govt.
yes, liberals are soft on crime thus encouraging more crime and creating more prisoners. Do you follow now?
You're not a fan of stats, are you? Since 1990 crime has fallen. 50%. Your "facts" are so incredibly wrong I'm guessing your news source is guessing
2. I don't even know what that means
So if the laws are in place, how should liberals be tougher on crime? Short of authoritarianism.
The idea is that good conservatives should use their guns to kill liberals off.
You're not a fan of stats, are you? Since 1990 crime has fallen. 50%. Your "facts" are so incredibly wrong I'm guessing your news source is guessing
2. I don't even know what that means
liberalism got big in 1960's. Since then crime is up 5 times what it was. Back then even in a ghetto you could go to sleep with your doors unlocked. The transformation to liberal America has been stunning!
that is actually what the Revolution and Constitution were all about. Founders were against big liberal govt because it had been source of evil in human history. They knew that without seeing the great 20th Century liberals, Hitler Stalin and Mao. Do you understand?
did you read op? you got hung for stealing a horse and 30 days for kissing your wife
Since many are incarcerated due to conservative draconian laws it is you conservatives that are the fascist ones on being against what one does to their own bodies.
because we are soft on crime and soft on individual responsibility as OP says
We have the worlds largest prison population because we are soft on crime?
Can anybody make sense of this?
So we should have those laws? Not sure how that means liberals are soft on crime.
sure, if punishment is too soft it encourages crime. Got it now?