• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Republicans Probably are White Nationalsts and Democrats.....

So?????????? fighting Nazis did damage to 60 million human being but it had to be done to preserve freedom. To say defeating the soviets discredited freedom is 100% nuts but typically liberal!!

James972:

What good is freedom to the millions of people who died in the hot-war cross fires of the Cold War? Between the Soviets and yourselves the butcher's bill was horrific. Millions in China (not counting the tens of millions to be laid at Mao Zhedong's own feet), over a million in North Korea, almost a million in South Korea, hundreds of thousands in Latin Amerca, over a million in Vietnam/Indochina, countless numbers in Africa, nearly a million in Indonesia, millions in the Middle East and Afghanistan. What good your much vaunted freedom to the dead?

And don't give me the old canard that just like WWII these deaths were unavoidable. Japan and Germany both declared war on the USA. America had no choice in the matter. But the Cold War and Soviet or American neo-colonialism is all on you and Russia because you both chose to do it voluntarily. You two are the manic titans, blinded and made callous by your polar convictions, whose 45 year long fist fight killed millions through your own ideological extremism. The responsibility lies squarely on both of you for this death toll.

Cheers.
Evilroddy.
 
James972:

What good is freedom to the millions of people who died in the hot-war cross fires of the Cold War?.

war is not good for those who die but it is very good for those who then get to live in freedom. 1+1=2
 
James972:

Wow! What seems to pass for History in your head must truly be extrodinary. The Soviets were the prime movers in defeating Nazi Germany.

wrong of course!! freedom defeated Nazis then Communists. Without Republican America the world today would be libnazicommie today. THe Republicans are the last best hope for freedom on earth.
 
The responsibility lies squarely on both of you for this death toll.

.
and the responsibility for all those killed in the American Revolution lies on our Founders. So???????? You must ask yourself if you are making a meaningful comment before you post. Thanks
 
war is not good for those who die but it is very good for those who then get to live in freedom. 1+1=2

James972:

1- millions +1=/= 2. It would seem that maths is as challenging as history for you.

Cheers.
Evilroddy
 
James972:

1- millions +1=/= 2. It would seem that maths is as challenging as history for you.

Cheers.
Evilroddy
war is not good for those who die but it is very good for those who then get to live in freedom. 1+1=2
 
wrong of course!! freedom defeated Nazis then Communists. Without Republican America the world today would be libnazicommie today. THe Republicans are the last best hope for freedom on earth.

James972:

Could you please explain to all here, and in détail, how freedom defeated the Nazis in WWII. How exactly did freedom kill, maim and capture the soldiers, gunners, tankers, airmen and kriegsmarine of Germany? Were freedom bombs raining down from liberty planes around Kiev, Vyasma, Moscow, Rzhev, Leningrad, Sevastopol, Stalingrad, Orel, Kursk, Budapest and Berlin from 1941-1945? How exactly did freedom dispose of the 2/3 of the German Army and Luftwaffe which was destroyed on the Eastern Front? I can hardly wait for an answer.

Cheers.
Evilroddy.
 
Last edited:
and the responsibility for all those killed in the American Revolution lies on our Founders. So???????? You must ask yourself if you are making a meaningful comment before you post. Thanks

James972:

That is a non sequitur and makes no sense. Reasoned argument rather than the zen-haïku of ignorance-based delusion is the recommended method of discourse on a forum entitled Debate Politics Forum.

I counter with "The omnipotent, ochre marmoset is an armchair, radiating adverbs of kale splendour to universal Itzel.". See, not a persuasive method of argumentation.

Cheers.
Evilroddy.
 
Last edited:
James972:

That is a non sequitur and makes no sense. Reasoned argument rather than the zen-haïku of ignorance-based delusion is the recommended method of discourse on a forum entitled Debate Politics Forum.

I counter with "The omnipotent, ochre marmoset is an armchair, radiating adverbs of kale splendour to universal Itzel.". See, not a persuasive method of argumentation.

Cheers.
Evilroddy.

translation: as a typical liberal I was defeated so will try to change subject by switching to gibberish to avoid substance.
 
war is not good for those who die but it is very good for those who then get to live in freedom. 1+1=2

James972:

Ah! Inane repetition now supplants rational argumentation. Always an effective strategy when applied by petulant children but somehow it lacks the same effecacy and caché when uttered by adults.

Cheers.
Evilroddy.
 
James972:

Ah! Inane repetition now supplants rational argumentation. Always an effective strategy when applied by petulant children but somehow it lacks the same effecacy and caché when uttered by adults.

Cheers.
Evilroddy.

if its not rational why are you so afraid to say why?? What do you learn from your fear?
 
if its not rational why are you so afraid to say why?? What do you learn from your fear?

James972:

I have learned nothing from your recent turn towards inane babbling. A reasonable third party might conclude that you're dropping intellectual jobbies in cludgie#972 however.

How about answering the questions asked of you in post # 82? Rationally.

Cheers.
Evilroddy.
 
James972:

I have learned nothing from your recent turn towards inane babbling.

if there is something about conservatism you don't understand why not tell us what it is? How will you learn if you are afraid to try?
 
How about answering the questions asked of you in post # 82? Rationally.

Cheers.
Evilroddy.

why not pick one important question that you feel was not answered well enough? In court you get one question at a time, for a reason. Did you know that?
 
Back
Top Bottom