• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should We Get Rid Of Monuments?

"You don’t necessarily need a choice of 23 underarm spray deodorants when children are hungry in this country," Sanders told John Harwood
exactly that is a key NaziMarxist economic idea. Avoid wasteful duplication in marketing manufacturing distribution advertising etc by having one state deodorant and one state car. This is why when I rented a car in Hungary in 1985 it had a dip stick rather than a gas gauge and a gravity fed carburetor so that you had to back it up hills to keep the gas flowing, and why 120 million humans slowly starved to death in the USSR and Red China!. Liberals simply lack the IQ to understand how capitalism works.

The idea that you don't need 23 brands when kids starve has nothing to do with either Nazis or communists.

People like you seem to lack the IQ to understand what Marxism and fascism are.
 
if I said they were I'll pay you $10,000.Bet? Do you know what a straw man is?

You already owe me something along the lines of 50,000 dollars from previous "bets" you never paid up on.
 
would you go down south and call their relatives thugs or is that something you do cowardly here? Liberals hated Viet Vets and Civil War vets equally and for same reason. Lincoln made a point of befriending them!!

Yes, I absolutely would call the people who denied American citizens their constitutional rights and fought for slavery thugs.

Not even close buddy. Where do you get this crap? Confederates did not fight for the US, and US troops in Vietnam had nothing in similarity to them.

And they made a point of murdering him for it.
 
Should we get rid of monuments?

No.

Hard to know the way forward when you don't know where you've been.

Monuments are a reminder and a testament of where the culture and the nation's been, and anchor from which to draw the vector that represents the path traveled from that point in history.

Its less important if you agree or disagree with the monument. More important that it's even there.
 
No one is "afraid" except for you buddy. Good job trying to avoid the facts though.

I said monuments were more like tombstones than celebrations. You said celebration was "Literally inscribed on the "monuments". I asked 5 times for examples but the liberal ran away with his trail between his legs

here's a good example:

The Confederate Monument located on the grounds of the Texas State Capital in Austin, Texas. The monument was erected in 1903 and is the largest monument on the Great Walk. The Alamo Monument and the Capital building are seen in the background. The monument lists the names of the States which formed the Confederacy (around the top) and the battles fought (around the bottom).

Here's another of what the liberal calls a "celebration"

Camp Beauregard Memorial​
"In Memory of the loyal men, who died here​
September 1861 to March 1862​
For the Confederate States of America.​
And were thus denied the Glory​
of heroic service in battle.​
Erected by the Kentucky Division,​
United Daughters of the Confederacy​
and​
Beauregard Monument Association​
of Louisiana.​



Now, Teddy Roosevelt riding full speed into battle on San Juan Hill with flag and sword waving is a celebration. Do you understand?
 
Last edited:
I said monuments were more like tombstones than celebrations. You said celebration was "Literally inscribed on the "monuments".

here's a good example:

The Confederate Monument located on the grounds of the Texas State Capital in Austin, Texas. The monument was erected in 1903 and is the largest monument on the Great Walk. The Alamo Monument and the Capital building are seen in the background. The monument lists the names of the States which formed the Confederacy (around the top) and the battles fought (around the bottom).

The celebration of the "triumph" of white supremacy is literally inscribed on many of these "monuments".

And no, that's still not a tombstone buddy.
 
The celebration of the "triumph" of white supremacy is literally inscribed on many of these "monuments".

And no, that's still not a tombstone buddy.

for 6th time do you have any examples or did you just make it up????????????????????????????????????????
 
for 6th time do you have any examples or did you just make it up????????????????????????????????????????

For the sixth time it's blatantly easy to find on google. Do you want to do it, or should I?
 
I said monuments were more like tombstones than celebrations. You said celebration was "Literally inscribed on the "monuments". I asked 5 times for examples but the liberal ran away with his trail between his legs

here's a good example:

The Confederate Monument located on the grounds of the Texas State Capital in Austin, Texas. The monument was erected in 1903 and is the largest monument on the Great Walk. The Alamo Monument and the Capital building are seen in the background. The monument lists the names of the States which formed the Confederacy (around the top) and the battles fought (around the bottom).

Here's another of what the liberal calls a "celebration"

Camp Beauregard Memorial​
"In Memory of the loyal men, who died here​
September 1861 to March 1862​
For the Confederate States of America.​
And were thus denied the Glory​
of heroic service in battle.​
Erected by the Kentucky Division,​
United Daughters of the Confederacy​
and​
Beauregard Monument Association​
of Louisiana.​



Now, Teddy Roosevelt riding full speed into battle on San Juan Hill with flag and sword waving is a celebration. Do you understand?

As usual, you have proven you live in a world of your own delusions. Nothing of the sort happened.

You showed that you are not competent enough to handle a very simple Google search, nor competent enough to ask for links, so I provided them for you. You are welcome.

What a surprise, your own post helps prove my point. Lying about "loyalty" and talking about "the glory of heroism in battle".

Now, that doesn't sound very much like a tombstone as it does glorifying combat now does it buddy.

The conservative has proven people like him are mentally incapable of understanding.
 
Back
Top Bottom