- Joined
- Jul 6, 2017
- Messages
- 122,485
- Reaction score
- 19,845
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Evidence that the US will act in it's own interest? Are you kidding?
Ok let me know when it happens
Evidence that the US will act in it's own interest? Are you kidding?
Russia is not a Frenemy.I think in discussions on the topic I finally figure out why so many smart people see this Russian collusion thing where as I do not. I mean beyond the obvious hatred toward him which makes them want him guilty.
I think maybe, people mistakenly believe we are still in a cold war with Russia like we are Iran and North Korea.
Russia is more like a less liked china. A friend-rival (with even more of the latter)
So they are confused why there are any interactions with official Russian ties.
It makes so much more sense.
I think in discussions on the topic I finally figure out why so many smart people see this Russian collusion thing where as I do not. I mean beyond the obvious hatred toward him which makes them want him guilty.
I think maybe, people mistakenly believe we are still in a cold war with Russia like we are Iran and North Korea.
Russia is more like a less liked china. A friend-rival (with even more of the latter)
So they are confused why there are any interactions with official Russian ties.
It makes so much more sense.
I think in discussions on the topic I finally figure out why so many smart people see this Russian collusion thing where as I do not. I mean beyond the obvious hatred toward him which makes them want him guilty.
I think maybe, people mistakenly believe we are still in a cold war with Russia like we are Iran and North Korea.
Russia is more like a less liked china. A friend-rival (with even more of the latter)
So they are confused why there are any interactions with official Russian ties.
It makes so much more sense.
We do in many countries. Not Russia or china
The US did mess with the elections in Russia in 1996.
Agreed. So that means you should assume it was more than what was known? Why?The extent of the interference is classified
Okay, but you understand we have diplomatic ties. That Americans and Russians do business.Russia is not a Frenemy.
Based on?You obviously know very little of European History.
AgreedRussia is a country with a LONG history of expansion and contracting.
Agreed. LOL and yes, I do not like under a rock.Putin is an old USSR soldier, and hankers for a new Russian empire, at the expense of its neighbors, heard of the Crimea, or the Ukraine?
Define what you mean by interfered. But no I not debating that fact.He has interfered in Western Elections for a few years, not just here in the USA.
They are probably wise.Hell, the Netherlands went back to paper ballots and counting by hand, for fear of outside meddling.
Bingo!!!So yes, its not a cold war
Okay.but Putin is no ones friend
Again, You mean pursue what he views as Russian interests. Yes I’d expect that in a Russian leader.and will continue to destabilize those countries that wish to curtail his and Russia's expansion.
Um, Okay. Well thanks? But in no way has anything I said not been verified. Nor is it based on Russian say so.I tutor history part time, consider this lesson a freebee. Never trust the Russians unless it can be verified.
and since the cold war is over, and Russia is not so bad after all, it's OK that the meddled in our presidential election. They're good guys now, so who cares, right?
Agreed. So that means you should assume it was more than what was known? Why?
Okay, but you understand we have diplomatic ties. That Americans and Russians do business.
We are not in a cold war with them like Iran or North Korea.
Based on?
Agreed
Agreed. LOL and yes, I do not like under a rock.
Define what you mean by interfered. But no I not debating that fact.
They are probably wise.
Bingo!!!
Okay.
Again, You mean pursue what he views as Russian interests. Yes I’d expect that in a Russian leader.
Um, Okay. Well thanks? But in no way has anything I said not been verified. Nor is it based on Russian say so.
It is a demostratable fact. You can interact with Russians as an American and not be committing a crime or collusion. If your dealing with Iran or North Korea, the likelihood not so high. See the difference?
Agreed. So that means you should assume it was more than what was known? Why?
Okay, but you understand we have diplomatic ties. That Americans and Russians do business.
We are not in a cold war with them like Iran or North Korea.
Based on?
Agreed
Agreed. LOL and yes, I do not like under a rock.
Define what you mean by interfered. But no I not debating that fact.
They are probably wise.
Bingo!!!
Okay.
Again, You mean pursue what he views as Russian interests. Yes I’d expect that in a Russian leader.
Um, Okay. Well thanks? But in no way has anything I said not been verified. Nor is it based on Russian say so.
It is a demostratable fact. You can interact with Russians as an American and not be committing a crime or collusion. If your dealing with Iran or North Korea, the likelihood not so high. See the difference?
I think in discussions on the topic I finally figure out why so many smart people see this Russian collusion thing where as I do not. I mean beyond the obvious hatred toward him which makes them want him guilty.
I think maybe, people mistakenly believe we are still in a cold war with Russia like we are Iran and North Korea.
Russia is more like a less liked china. A friend-rival (with even more of the latter)
So they are confused why there are any interactions with official Russian ties.
It makes so much more sense.
Do you think the US does not engage in election interference in many countrys? Or outright coups?
The US waging in election interference in another country's affairs does in no way shape or form excuse the Trump Crime Family from doing in the US with Russian help.Does that somehow excuse it? Why would you want to be allies with a country that does that to us?
Does that somehow excuse it? Why would you want to be allies with a country that does that to us?
Do you think the US does not engage in election interference in many countrys? Or outright coups?
That is a false argument, but interesting. Why would that be of significance in the way we treat the enemy?
I await your evidence. I doubt I will get it
The U.S. also attempted to sway Russian elections. In 1996, with the presidency of Boris Yeltsin and the Russian economy flailing, President Clinton endorsed a $10.2-billion loan from the International Monetary Fund linked to privatization, trade liberalization and other measures that would move Russia toward a capitalist economy. Yeltsin used the loan to bolster his popular support, telling voters that only he had the reformist credentials to secure such loans, according to media reports at the time. He used the money, in part, for social spending before the election, including payment of back wages and pensions.
And yet the investigations into collusion, interference and financial crimes continue, unhysterically and methodically, and Trump inner circle members keep lying...
A loan. Done openly with no secrecy involved. You must be kidding?
Yes it is an anology in this case.
I will have to remember that secrecy is what matters here and not messing around with other countries elections.
Hey Russia, you should have just interfered in the election in the open and then everything would have been ok. :lol:
The source of hysteria is little more than a concerted attack by some against a president they didn't want, and desperately want to discredit, delegitimatize, damage, and who's agenda they want to thwart 'by any means necessary', as his agenda, the agenda the US electorate voted for, directly threatens their base of power and control, and they don't like that. They'd much rather be in power and political control, so their reaction, as violent in action as rhetoric as it is, isn't, and wasn't, unforeseeable.
Russia is like any convert to a new ideology after years of repression, an uber-believer in the new ideology.
When the Soviet Union dissolved, Russia became it's most radical opposite...unrestrained Capitalist, what I like to call rapacious Capitalism.
Think of them as reflecting the era of the American Robber Barons, led by people mimicking Carnegie, Astor, Mellon, and Morgan.
People scrambled for wealth and power, and every former advantage was used to secure a place in the new order.
I see China leaning the same way, but in a more restrained "Socialist" manner using the established system to retain control for the new Communist oligarchs that replaced the revolutionary Maoists.