• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Kamala Harris--avenging goddess?!

Vote for individuals.

Oh, would you like to a start a thread about me? Don't get me wrong, I'm certainly interesting enough a subject material for a thread devoted to the greatness that is Cardinal.
 
Ahhh. The little lady "rattled" the AG of the US. She made him "nervous."

Just maybe he ain't up to the task of being the chief enforcement officer of the US. He seems a little "delicate." Maybe, a bit "hysterical" himself.

What a juvenile comment.
 
Oh, would you like to a start a thread about me? Don't get me wrong, I'm certainly interesting enough a subject material for a thread devoted to the greatness that is Cardinal.

You aren't reading very well--at all--tonight. This is quite a non sequitur. I can't imagine where you got the idea that my saying that I vote for individuals and am sorry if you don't somehow has translated into my wanting to begin a thread about you.
 
that someone like her ends up the AG of california after flunking the bar despite going to one of the better schools in california (and in California, some of the competition didn't even attend law school or an accredited school) and as a senator, shows how f'd up the system is.

He track record shows a lot of opportunity squandered through incompetence. This makes her perfect to lead the DNC. People with a long track record of mediocrity and failure are the stars of the Democratic party.

Hillary has a lifetime of government service and was a failure in everything she touched (and also flunked the D.C. Bar Exam)

DWS is a habitual liar and allowed terrorist sympathyzers to get unfettered access to government computers.

Bernie Sanders never even had a job until he was 40 and it was a government job at that.

Joe Biden is a mediocre lifelong politician who screwed up everything he touched just like Hillary Clinton.

The only person who is considered an UP n Comer is Elizabeth Warren and she's got more skeletons than a graveyard.
 
You aren't reading very well--at all--tonight. This is quite a non sequitur. I can't imagine where you got the idea that my saying that I vote for individuals and am sorry if you don't somehow has translated into my wanting to begin a thread about you.

Again, if you're asking for permission to start a thread on me, you have it. But you should know that those whose opinions of strong women are that they are "rude, interrupting bitches" doesn't mean terribly much to me. You can hide behind the "I prefer polite people" curtain all day long, but you kind of cut yourself off at the knees there.

What a juvenile comment.

Pot. Kettle.
 
Again, if you're asking for permission to start a thread on me, you have it. But you should know that those whose opinions of strong women are that they are "rude, interrupting bitches" doesn't mean terribly much to me. You can hide behind the "I prefer polite people" curtain all day long, but you kind of cut yourself off at the knees there.



Pot. Kettle.

Oh, please. This little tantrum of yours started when you -- that is, Cardinal -- made it personal about nota bene:

https://www.debatepolitics.com/us-p...harris-avenging-goddess-5.html#post1067334770

This nonsense about wanting to start a thread about you is juvenile even by your usual standards.
 
that someone like her ends up the AG of california after flunking the bar despite going to one of the better schools in california (and in California, some of the competition didn't even attend law school or an accredited school) and as a senator, shows how f'd up the system is.

Come on TD, I respect your academic pedigree. Can you at least acknowledge a few people demonstrate talent without high academic achievement? Take Steven Spielberg for instance. Many consider him a genius in his craft. I don't think academic acumen factored into his success.
In Los Angeles, he applied to the University of Southern California's film school, but was turned down because of his "C" grade average.[14]:548 He then applied and was admitted to California State University, Long Beach, where he became a brother of Theta Chi Fraternity.[24]
While still a student, he was offered a small unpaid intern job at Universal Studios with the editing department.[25][26] He was later given the opportunity to make a short film for theatrical release, the 26-minute, 35mm, Amblin', which he wrote and directed. Studio vice president Sidney Sheinberg was impressed by the film, which had won a number of awards, and offered Spielberg a seven-year directing contract. It made him the youngest director ever to be signed for a long-term deal with a major Hollywood studio.[14]:548 He subsequently dropped out of college to begin professionally directing TV productions with Universal.[27][28] Spielberg later returned to Cal State Long Beach and completed his BA degree in Film and Electronic Arts in 2002

Take Trump as another example. He graduated Wharton's. I feel fairly certain I completed a less arduous, yet similar, curriculum at the University of Florida. Truly, Trump does not come across as a well-read intellectual or gifted academically. As much as I don't like Trump, I can at least recognize impressive talent in him. He aspired to become POTUS. He won on his first serious attempt.

Kayla Harris, in spite of not passing the California Bar on her first attempt, IMO, has since demonstrated some serious political talent. I sure can't picture Florida AG Pam Bondi outperforming Kayla Harris. Again, just my opinion....
 
Come on TD, I respect your academic pedigree. Can you at least acknowledge a few people demonstrate talent without high academic achievement? Take Steven Spielberg for instance. Many consider him a genius in his craft. I don't think academic acumen factored into his success.


Take Trump as another example. He graduated Wharton's. I feel fairly certain I completed a less arduous, yet similar, curriculum at the University of Florida. Truly, Trump does not come across as a well-read intellectual or gifted academically. As much as I don't like Trump, I can at least recognize impressive talent in him. He aspired to become POTUS. He won on his first serious attempt.

Kayla Harris, in spite of not passing the California Bar on her first attempt, IMO, has since demonstrated some serious political talent. I sure can't picture Florida AG Pam Bondi outperforming Kayla Harris. Again, just my opinion....

I will agree she has some political talent. that doesn't engender respect from me btw. But I concede your point
 
she's a lightweight intellectually with a lightweight resume that was padded due to the fact that she could satisfy so many different special interest groups. Her main claim to fame is Obama thought she was the hottest AG in the country. She is grandstanding to pander to the "we hate Trump" and "the "we are still pissed hillary lost" groups

Your fear smells awful, dude.
 
I want to hear what Kamala Harris has to say. Would you describe Trey Gowdy or Donald Trump as less aggressive and rude?

For sure. She was over the top.

Senator Harris grilled Jeff Sessions and Rod Rosenstein. Lots of people do not trust Jeff Sessions. Sessions, even as a former Senator, does not engender bipartisan support. Rosenstein, who does engender bipartisan support, obfuscated when asked by Senator Harris to clarify and put in writing important issues regarding Mueller.

That doesn't excuse rudeness.
 
For sure. She was over the top.



That doesn't excuse rudeness.

President Trump, with a documented history of rude, crude and disruptive behavior to go along with a penchant for lying, has his share of apologists. So does Senator Harris. With you characterizing her as rude, I do not expect you to vote for her or support any of her endeavors. Fair enough. Peace to you and yours!
 
She was awesome.

It appeared she was on menapause and looked erratic. The woman should know her role and ask questions properly and let Sessions answer her very partisan questions.
 
President Trump, with a documented history of rude, crude and disruptive behavior to go along with a penchant for lying, has his share of apologists. So does Senator Harris. With you characterizing her as rude, I do not expect you to vote for her or support any of her endeavors. Fair enough. Peace to you and yours!

I didn't bring Trump up. You did. What does his rudeness have to do with hers?
 
I didn't bring Trump up. You did. What does his rudeness have to do with hers?

They both have obvious political aspirations, thus seek the spotlight. You characterized Senator Harris as inexcusably rude. Do you admire the way Rep. Trey Gowdy pontificates, badgers, leads, and interrupts witnesses?

I referenced Trump's rudeness as an example because Trump holds the top spot in the World Political Hierarchy.

Fairness implies a recognizable standard.
 
They both have obvious political aspirations, thus seek the spotlight. You characterized Senator Harris as inexcusably rude. Do you admire the way Rep. Trey Gowdy pontificates, badgers, leads, and interrupts witnesses?

I referenced Trump's rudeness as an example because Trump holds the top spot in the World Political Hierarchy.

Fairness implies a recognizable standard.

Let me see if I understand this. I agree with a poster who said she was rude. Because I did that I am required to state that people from the other party are rude? It reminds me of the proposed law some years ago that would require media to split time equally between the two parties. You are a hopeless partisan.
 
For sure. She was over the top.



That doesn't excuse rudeness.

President Trump, with a documented history of rude, crude and disruptive behavior to go along with a penchant for lying, has his share of apologists. So does Senator Harris. With you characterizing her as rude, I do not expect you to vote for her or support any of her endeavors. Fair enough. Peace to you and yours!

I didn't bring Trump up. You did. What does his rudeness have to do with hers?

They both have obvious political aspirations, thus seek the spotlight. You characterized Senator Harris as inexcusably rude. Do you admire the way Rep. Trey Gowdy pontificates, badgers, leads, and interrupts witnesses?

I referenced Trump's rudeness as an example because Trump holds the top spot in the World Political Hierarchy.

Fairness implies a recognizable standard.

Let me see if I understand this. I agree with a poster who said she was rude. Because I did that I am required to state that people from the other party are rude? It reminds me of the proposed law some years ago that would require media to split time equally between the two parties. You are a hopeless partisan.

That you accepted your fate as a Vietnam draftee and made it back means something favorable to me. Our nations laws may have required you to serve. I don't believe I have ever required you to do or not do anything. I don't have that kind of power.
IMO, this Thread's OP has a RW perspective. I responded with a LW perspective. We do that in a Political Debate Forum. You have described me as "a hopeless partisan". I would describe myself as "a hopeful partisan".

Again, as stated in an earlier post, peace to you and yours!
 
That you accepted your fate as a Vietnam draftee and made it back means something favorable to me. Our nations laws may have required you to serve. I don't believe I have ever required you to do or not do anything. I don't have that kind of power.
IMO, this Thread's OP has a RW perspective. I responded with a LW perspective. We do that in a Political Debate Forum. You have described me as "a hopeless partisan". I would describe myself as "a hopeful partisan".

Again, as stated in an earlier post, peace to you and yours!

Thanks and same for you.
 
"Rudeness" = not staying in her place.

That sounds terrible. Rudeness means turning questions into rhetoric by not allowing answers.
 
The GOP has binders full of boogiewomen .
 
Back
Top Bottom