• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

"Comey"; my analysis based on 'Day One'

Master PO said:
you are never going to run on facts, because you are an emotion based person and everything for you in politics is based on how you feel, and you arguing on feelings is a losing position for you
Click to expand...

Oh, dear. Only an emotional train wreck would post such dishonesty.

It's OK that you fear the facts of Comey's testimony. You have every reason to.
 
Master PO said:
iam not quoting his lawyer.

i started by quoting comey and what he said.

comeys firing.......IS over russia

but it has been stated because comey WOULD NOT LIFT THE CLOUD, is why he was fired
Click to expand...

Oh, that's not Trump's lawyer. Whoops. My bad.

But I think my point still stands. It has been stated by Trump himself, that his reasoning behind Comey's firing is that he believed the Russia investigation was all a scam.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
Oh, dear. Only an emotional train wreck would post such dishonesty.

It's OK that you fear the facts of Comey's testimony. You have every reason to.
Click to expand...

i posted what i had to say, i stand by it and confident in it.

you on the other hand, thats a different matter
 
TheGoverness said:
Oh, that's not Trump's lawyer. Whoops. My bad.

But I think my point still stands. It has been stated by Trump himself, that his reasoning behind Comey's firing is that he believed the Russia investigation was all a scam.
Click to expand...

ok i can buy that argument.

trump thinks it a scam, [the cloud] trump told comey several times, go to the media and tell them i am not under investigation, comey failed in doing that
 
Master PO said:
my friend i have confidence you dont, which is why you keep the conversation going
Click to expand...

Yes, you have great, if not profound confidence in fairy tales about things that actually didn't happen. It's why you keep posting.

I'll take reality, each and every time.
 
Skeptic Bob said:
I don't see any counter-arguments in there so I assume you withdrawal your initial assertion that Comey broke the law in revealing the contents of his conversation with Trump?
Click to expand...
You're wrong again Bob, Comey obviously broke the law.

But 'political insiders' are rarely brought to justice for their crimes.

Or do you subscribe to the Trump practice of rarely admitting you're wrong? There is no shame in being wrong.
Click to expand...
To be quite honest, I do hate admitting to being wrong; especially to a liberal.

But I will and have actually done so; thankfully such admissions are rarely necessary.

I'm wrong all the time. Here is an example from just yesterday.

https://www.debatepolitics.com/brea...ce-dept-lawyer-lead-fbi-6.html#post1067286470
Click to expand...
Obviously...

Come on, Empirica, you can do it. It is very liberating. :)
Click to expand...
It's simply amazing that anyone could actually believe that Comey's "leak" was a lawful act.
 
calamity said:
I'm sure you'll find out what really happened when you read Trump's tweets tonight.
In the meantime we'll just go by what we saw and heard today.

1. Trump is liar.

2. Russia did interfere in our elections, our media, our minds

3. Trump wanted Comey to drop the Russian investigation.

4. Trump fired Comey after he wouldn't drop the Russian investigation.

5. Trump telling everyone else to leave the room so that he could talk privately to the FBI Director is suspicious as hell. It indicates that Comey's testimony about the nature of that conversation is true and that Trump knew it was illegal.
Click to expand...
What "we saw and heard today" was the testimony of one single witness without the support of corroborating evidence.
 
Empirica said:
What "we saw and heard today" was the testimony of one single witness without the support of corroborating evidence.
Click to expand...

So far
 
Nothing for nothing Emperica...but I just wanted to say IMO --

your weird boldy / underline / italics style with every post is really annoying.

Just sayin...
 
Empirica said:
What "we saw and heard today" was the testimony of one single witness without the support of corroborating evidence.
Click to expand...

Let's put that noted libertarian, DJT under oath and ask him about a lot of things. Start with ***** grabbing...they just let him do it. He's a star.

The "libertarians" who support authoritarian Trump crack me up. The cognitive dissonance should explode their heads. I suppose what saves them is the fact they aren't really libertarians, just right wing daddy-state worshipping nuts.
 
Paperview said:
Nothing for nothing Emperica...but I just wanted to say IMO --

your weird boldy / underline / italics style with every post is really annoying.

Just sayin...
Click to expand...

It's a way of screaming in loud blood red, from the basement?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom