• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trup Tweets WITCH HUNT!!!!!!![W:244]

Hari Seldon said:
Did you complain when McConnell said his first priority was to make Obama a 1 term President. First priority mind you. Would you like some cheese with that whine? LOL!

Sent from my VS990 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

So you're attempting to suggest one guy's comments are equal to what the left is doing today?

Would you like some oxygen with your next breath?

Let's try to keep the arguments a bit more rational.
 
ocean515 said:
LOL

Add another to the list of people seeking to overturn and erase the vote of 62,000,000 citizens.

The liberal meme of tolerance and inclusion receives more confirmation!

:applaud

:thumbs:
Click to expand...

At least you didn't deny he was a criminal.
 
Kobie said:
If Trump is found to be guilty of impeachable offenses, that is not erasing anyone's vote. But I understand your defensiveness, given your full-throated support of a man completely unfit for office.
Click to expand...

And IF a massive meteorite strikes Earth, all this will be moot. Such is the strength of "if".

I understand your paranoia, given your full throated support for the war on democracy.
 
ocean515 said:
There are plenty of badly mentally disturbed individuals offering opinions about what is going on, but President Trump is not one of them.
Click to expand...

All available evidence indicates that he is. Sorry.
Using lies, deceit, fraud, and manipulation, the left is indeed earning the descriptions that have been made of them.

The lefts war on democracy, where they are seeking to overturn the will of the citizens of the country, is a direct threat. Unprecedented in my lifetime.
Click to expand...

Awwww.. There is no such war, despite your desperate need for their to be one. Nor can you demonstrate that there is one.
Worse still is the encouragement the leadership on the left is receiving from supporters who are eager to see this war on democracy succeed.
Click to expand...

That which doesn't exist cannot 'succeed'.
It will be interesting to see how the citizens will respond to a political party that is doing nothing, offering nothing, and succeeding at that approach with flying colors.
Click to expand...

LOL! How's that republican agenda working out since Trump's election?
Seems to me, voters, no matter political party affiliation, expect their elected representatives to actually do something, rather than spend every waking moment obsessed with a game plan that seeks to erase and ignore what 62,000,000 citizens did last November.
Click to expand...

No votes will be erased, regardless of what happens with manchild Trump. That's how our system works.

Please pay better attention.
 
ocean515 said:
I note you join your leadership in trying to erase and ignore the will of 62,000,000 citizens. THAT makes crystal clear who supports this crap and where they stand with everyday Americans.
Click to expand...

As noted in the other thread:

RickJames3000 said:
The term "everyday Americans" is a dog whistle that makes anyone who uses it look like a hyper-partisan shill with nothing useful to add to the discussion.
Click to expand...
 
Chomsky said:
You are definitely right in that the majority (HRC) needs to respect the minority (Trump) in this instance, due to the Constitutional vagaries of the Electoral College.

The Constitution allowed the minority to prevail. And it is law.

But now the minority must in turn respect the majority's current application of the Constitution and the law, including impeachment if warranted.

This is the way our constitutional republic allows the peaceful exchange of power.
Click to expand...

I have no problem with impeachment, if warranted.

I have a serious problem with the lefts war on democracy, and the means they are using to carry it out. They are not allowing the process to unfold, but are engaged in trial and conviction based on hearsay and deceit. Can't imagine you would endorse this tactic.

And for what it's worth, the majority elected President Trump. It serves no purpose to keep clinging to the popular vote issue, given all and more of the margin was provided by one state, who's population has been bought and paid for by government edict.

Remember, the Founding Fathers predicted as much, and protected the office of the Presidency from the fallout from such influence.
 
ocean515 said:
There are plenty of badly mentally disturbed individuals offering opinions about what is going on, but President Trump is not one of them.

Using lies, deceit, fraud, and manipulation, the left is indeed earning the descriptions that have been made of them.

The lefts war on democracy, where they are seeking to overturn the will of the citizens of the country, is a direct threat. Unprecedented in my lifetime.

Worse still is the encouragement the leadership on the left is receiving from supporters who are eager to see this war on democracy succeed.

It will be interesting to see how the citizens will respond to a political party that is doing nothing, offering nothing, and succeeding at that approach with flying colors.

Seems to me, voters, no matter political party affiliation, expect their elected representatives to actually do something, rather than spend every waking moment obsessed with a game plan that seeks to erase and ignore what 62,000,000 citizens did last November.
Click to expand...

The left does not want to declare war on democracy. They are just scared man.... scared for being so stupid as to think that so few would vote for an obviously unqualified president. They thought voting was done by reasonable thinking people and never considered enough dummies existed to elect him president so they just sat home and and "watched" the vote on cable instead of going to the polls. So yes, you can say the left has declared war on democracy if you like but eventually you will come to see that "war" is just a metaphor for exterminating idiocy.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
All available evidence indicates that he is. Sorry.

Awwww.. There is no such war, despite your desperate need for their to be one. Nor can you demonstrate that there is one.

That which doesn't exist cannot 'succeed'.

LOL! How's that republican agenda working out since Trump's election?

No votes will be erased, regardless of what happens with manchild Trump. That's how our system works.

Please pay better attention.
Click to expand...

Thank you for offering your opinion. It is as relevant and well documented as I have become accustomed to viewing.
 
ocean515 said:
Seems to me, voters, no matter political party affiliation, expect their elected representatives to actually do something, rather than spend every waking moment obsessed with a game plan that seeks to erase and ignore what 62,000,000 citizens did last November.
Click to expand...

Well, when 65,844,610 didn't want the loser in November, I guess I can understand their angst...seems they were right all along.

EDIT: Oops, forgot to include the 7,804,213 that voted independent... So, what's that, 73,648,823? Ya that sounds about right...lolz.
 
ocean515 said:
So you're attempting to suggest one guy's comments are equal to what the left is doing today?

Would you like some oxygen with your next breath?

Let's try to keep the arguments a bit more rational.
Click to expand...
Now who's being neive. The leader of the Senate claims his first priority is to basically undermine the President to limit him to 1 term. I think a few more people were on board with that. Hell there was one conman dope who proposed a bill that Obama agreed with them the moron refused to vote for his own bill. If the twit n chief could control himself the press wouldn't have such a field day. We can also go back to the Clinton impeachment bull****. I still remember that fat **** Henry Hyde claiming moral superiority while cheating himself. What a joke. Keep whining dude, it is entertaining.

Sent from my VS990 using Tapatalk
 
ocean515 said:
Thank you for offering your opinion. It is as relevant and well documented as I have become accustomed to viewing.
Click to expand...

LOL! I'll leave you to your deulsional fantasies about a 'war on democracy' and your absolute inability to rationally address anything.

Good luck with your magical thinking!
 
Hari Seldon said:
Now who's being neive. The leader of the Senate claims his first priority is to basically undermine the President to limit him to 1 term. I think a few more people were on board with that. Hell there was one conman dope who proposed a bill that Obama agreed with them the moron refused to vote for his own bill. If the twit n chief could control himself the press wouldn't have such a field day. We can also go back to the Clinton impeachment bull****. I still remember that fat **** Henry Hyde claiming moral superiority while cheating himself. What a joke. Keep whining dude, it is entertaining.

Sent from my VS990 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

LOL

Thanks for a well crafted and intellectually sound reply.
 
I wish he'd quit with the tweets, it makes him seem like such the snowflake and is quite embarrassing to us all.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
LOL! I'll leave you to your deulsional fantasies about a 'war on democracy' and your absolute inability to rationally address anything.

Good luck with your magical thinking!
Click to expand...

Strong, is irony, in this one..... :tink:
 
ocean515 said:
Thank you for your opinion. I'm not surprised you would join Hillary Clinton in her loathing of the average Joe and Jane living in the United States.
Click to expand...

You are failing here because you obviously don't understand how this works.

Given that HRC received a plurality in the 2016 presidential election, she has the best claim to having represented the will of "the average Joe and Jane living in the United States".

Take a step back and try to regain a small measure of objectivity.
Maybe Trump's consistent dishonesty is rubbing off on you.
 
Mach said:
This is the single greatest witch hunt of a politician in American history! DJT

You are the single worst person for the presidency in American history!

PS. STOP TWEETING LIKE A SNOWFLAKE VICTIM!
Click to expand...

A triggered snowflake victim who lost his binky.
 
ocean515 said:
And IF a massive meteorite strikes Earth, all this will be moot. Such is the strength of "if".

I understand your paranoia, given your full throated support for the war on democracy.
Click to expand...

Got any links to respectable sites that are covering "the war on democracy"? I haven't run across it. Is it something Trump supporters just 'fee'l?
 
SDET said:
And 128 million voted for a criminal and con-person. I hate to say it, but our society has degraded to the point where Donald Trump is the best that we can hope for.
Click to expand...

He's most certainly not. He's the worst.
 
Chomsky said:
You are definitely right in that the majority (HRC) needs to respect the minority (Trump) in this instance, due to the Constitutional vagaries of the Electoral College.

The Constitution allowed the minority to prevail. And it is law.

But now the minority must in turn respect the majority's current application of the Constitution and the law, including impeachment if warranted.

This is the way our constitutional republic allows the peaceful exchange of power.
Click to expand...

You see the EC as unfair yet many see it as quite logical, as well as sanctioned by the constitution. Using games (states) won instead of total points scored (popular vote margins) during a season is a common technique for choosing a champion (winning) sports team.
 
Ikari said:
I wish he'd quit with the tweets, it makes him seem like such the snowflake and is quite embarrassing to us all.
Click to expand...

The funny thing is that I think he is just trying to use current technology to communicate. Could be a good....if not great thing.

Unfortunately, the quality of his tweets are less Presidential and more middle school adolescent that was triggered and cannot control himself.
 
RickJames3000 said:
You are failing here because you obviously don't understand how this works.

Given that HRC received a plurality in the 2016 presidential election, she has the best claim to having represented the will of "the average Joe and Jane living in the United States".

Take a step back and try to regain a small measure of objectivity.
Maybe Trump's consistent dishonesty is rubbing off on you.
Click to expand...

LOL

I don't understand how this works? Who is President of the United States?

The Founding Fathers recognized people could be bought off by promises made by officials and others in regions with no connection to people in other regions. This influence could easily overwhelm less populated regions containing people with different but equally important concerns. Thus, the Electoral College was created exclusively to elect the President of the United States.

This last election provided a perfect example of this potential. All, and more, of Clinton's popular vote was provided by one state, dominated by politics and influence over it's citizens that matched Clinton's platform.

Should the citizens of one state decide who the President of the United States should be?

I'm going to suggest you take your own advice and take a step back. It would appear the lies, deceit, and manipulation of Hillary the loser, and her party, have taken firm hold of you.
 
ocean515 said:
LOL

I don't understand how this works? Who is President of the United States?

The Founding Fathers recognized people could be bought off by promises made by officials and others in regions with no connection to people in other regions. This influence could easily overwhelm less populated regions containing people with different but equally important concerns. Thus, the Electoral College was created exclusively to elect the President of the United States.

This last election provided a perfect example of this potential. All, and more, of Clinton's popular vote was provided by one state, dominated by politics and influence over it's citizens that matched Clinton's platform.

Should the citizens of one state decide who the President of the United States should be?

I'm going to suggest you take your own advice and take a step back. It would appear the lies, deceit, and manipulation of Hillary the loser, and her party, have taken firm hold of you.
Click to expand...

Naturally you ignore the indefensible portion of your post that I was specifically talking about...
Your dishonest and repeated attempts to color Trump-supporters as "everyday Americans" and "average Joes and Janes"... in opposition to HRC voters.

The numbers clearly run counter to your assertion.
 
ocean515 said:
I have no problem with impeachment, if warranted.

I have a serious problem with the lefts war on democracy, and the means they are using to carry it out. They are not allowing the process to unfold, but are engaged in trial and conviction based on hearsay and deceit. Can't imagine you would endorse this tactic.
Click to expand...
Actually, the GOP and their stonewalling & and virtual abetting caused this to fester more than needed. I used Nunes as an example in previous posts. If it appeared the GOP took Trump's transgressions seriously (Comey for example), we would not be in this spot.

And for what it's worth, the majority elected President Trump. It serves no purpose to keep clinging to the popular vote issue, given all and more of the margin was provided by one state, who's population has been bought and paid for by government edict.
Click to expand...
No they didn't. No Kelly Conway alt-facts allowed here! Spin it how you want, but the bolded is patently false. With all respect, if you can't admit Trump was elected by a minority, this may be emblematic of your lack of understanding here.

Remember, the Founding Fathers predicted as much, and protected the office of the Presidency from the fallout from such influence.
Click to expand...
The founding fathers also put in checks and balances, which would seem to be where we are today. I also believe they would never have tolerated a President who had asked a foreign enemy to assist in his election to the Presidency.
 
<alt>doxygen said:
Got any links to respectable sites that are covering "the war on democracy"? I haven't run across it. Is it something Trump supporters just 'fee'l?
Click to expand...

Just read the headlines and watch the comments from the leadership on the left and their MSM partners. Conviction prior to trial is rather obvious, as is the effort the topple an administration 62,000,000 just elected to office.

How would you define an almost unilateral effort that includes calls for removal, impeachment, and incarceration where the only evidence is hyperbole, conjecture, and hearsay?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom