• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

****ing with the donald

justabubba

justabubba

long standing member
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 22, 2005
Messages
66,431
Reaction score
47,470
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
which republican politician said this:
“Donald, the ratings are in, and you got swamped! Now you’re in the 30s. But, what do you expect? I mean, to take away after-school programs for children and Meals on Wheels for the poor people? That’s not what you call making America Great Again. Come on. I mean, who is advising you?”
Click to expand...
 
Wall Street Journal also flayed Trump last night, by the way. It points out how Trump is jeopardizing his own credibility, particularly with clinging to the idea that Obama ordered a "wire tapp" on his campaign.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-presidents-credibility-1490138920

Brit Hume retweeted it, saying "Trump would be wise to heed this scathing editorial."
 
Visbek said:
Wall Street Journal also flayed Trump last night, by the way. It points out how Trump is jeopardizing his own credibility, particularly with clinging to the idea that Obama ordered a "wire tapp" on his campaign.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-presidents-credibility-1490138920

Brit Hume retweeted it, saying "Trump would be wise to heed this scathing editorial."
Click to expand...

I get your point and I don't disagree, but the WSJ article is behind a paywall... is there a welfare program for that?
 
Visbek said:
Wall Street Journal also flayed Trump last night, by the way. It points out how Trump is jeopardizing his own credibility, particularly with clinging to the idea that Obama ordered a "wire tapp" on his campaign.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-presidents-credibility-1490138920

Brit Hume retweeted it, saying "Trump would be wise to heed this scathing editorial."
Click to expand...

If Trump were wise, he wouldn't have said the crazy stuff he has said, and he would have closed his Twitter account months ago.
 
Dittohead not! said:
If Trump were wise, he wouldn't have said the crazy stuff he has said, and he would have closed his Twitter account months ago.
Click to expand...

Thank god he isn't. Could you imagine having a POTUS that believes the things Trump does, but also has self control? I bet they would get a lot less attention.
 
MrPeanut said:
Thank god he isn't. Could you imagine having a POTUS that believes the things Trump does, but also has self control? I bet they would get a lot less attention.
Click to expand...

Oh, I didn't say he wasn't smart. He must be, or he wouldn't have been able to fool enough people to get elected. Being wise is quite a different matter.

Now, his followers aren't very smart, or wise, but the sheep dog has to be smarter than the sheep.
 
Visbek said:
Wall Street Journal also flayed Trump last night, by the way. It points out how Trump is jeopardizing his own credibility, particularly with clinging to the idea that Obama ordered a "wire tapp" on his campaign.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-presidents-credibility-1490138920

Brit Hume retweeted it, saying "Trump would be wise to heed this scathing editorial."
Click to expand...

Dittohead not! said:
If Trump were wise, he wouldn't have said the crazy stuff he has said, and he would have closed his Twitter account months ago.
Click to expand...

MrPeanut said:
Thank god he isn't. Could you imagine having a POTUS that believes the things Trump does, but also has self control? I bet they would get a lot less attention.
Click to expand...

Dittohead not! said:
Oh, I didn't say he wasn't smart. He must be, or he wouldn't have been able to fool enough people to get elected. Being wise is quite a different matter.

Now, his followers aren't very smart, or wise, but the sheep dog has to be smarter than the sheep.
Click to expand...

The way things are going, Trump won't be in office by mid-terms. What a pathetic, stupid little man.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom