• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

EXCLUSIVE: Podesta Was Board Member Of Firms Linked To Russian Investors

Hijaack how, exactly?

By stepping in and actively working to elect their candidate of choice when that is something that only the American people should be doing.
 
And you guys voted for a lying PoS con man.

Daily Trump proves why he does love to poorly educated. lol

So there are no poorly educated liberals? I think of one group right off that fits that bill, you want to go there? I mean you had to be skull****ed braindead to vote for Hillary.
 
Gawd, could this be any more transparent? What a pathetic attempt.
It was a yawner two years ago, when the NYT reported it. Now it's big news?

Yeah.
I mentioned yesterday that you can tell when events are being used politically if the reaction to 2 events aren't the same even though the accusations are the same ... in this case canoodling with Russia.
Thanks for the confirmation.
 
Interesting to know you're very concerned about Russia and involvement with the election.

I'm sure I'll be reminding you of this concern frequent rly over the next few months.

Interesting to know you weren't before now.
 
Yeah.
I mentioned yesterday that you can tell when events are being used politically if the reaction to 2 events aren't the same even though the accusations are the same ... in this case canoodling with Russia.
Thanks for the confirmation.
How about reactions to Comey (and the FBI) becoming politically involved? Dems hated it when the FBI investigated Hillary before the election then dems tried to exonerate Hillary after that organization said they didn't find anything to recommend a conviction of Hillary.

Of course, Comey and the FBI are again being political with its involvement in the investigation of the Trump transition team. How are the dems reacting to Comey, now? Do they think he is a god or at least a superstar?
In such a short time, dems hated Comey, then they tolerated Comey, now they love Comey. What a roller coaster.
 
Last edited:
Still no sign or evidence of Obama tapping Trumps phones just before the election. NONE!

This is just another Trump Butt boy running interference and spewing more deflection for the Liar in chief.

Still no sign that Trump or his aides colluded with the Russians to influence the election. NONE!
 
Patience is a virtue young lady. Watergate took two years.

This is music to my ears. Yes, by all means, waste two years to find out that in 2018 you have lost even more ground.
 
So there are no poorly educated liberals? I think of one group right off that fits that bill, you want to go there? I mean you had to be skull****ed braindead to vote for Hillary.

I find it funny whenever the left brings this up. They claim to be the party that represents the little people while Republicans are the party of the rich and yet they claim it is the Republicans who pander to the uneducated and not them. I can't imagine what twisted world makes sense out of that.
 
This is music to my ears. Yes, by all means, waste two years to find out that in 2018 you have lost even more ground.

Two years of investigations means two years of crippled Trump.
 
Yeah.
I mentioned yesterday that you can tell when events are being used politically if the reaction to 2 events aren't the same even though the accusations are the same ... in this case canoodling with Russia.
Thanks for the confirmation.

I didnt read the link carefully but wasnt it about a Canadian mining company?
 
I find it funny whenever the left brings this up. They claim to be the party that represents the little people while Republicans are the party of the rich and yet they claim it is the Republicans who pander to the uneducated and not them. I can't imagine what twisted world makes sense out of that.

The kind of twisted mind that can comprehend the possibility that Repubs say one thing (pander to the uneducation) while doing another (promoting the interests of the wealthy)

You know, the kind of twisted mind intelligent people have
 
just innuendo?

You mean Trump did not really appoint people who lied about their connections to Russians?

There is no evidence the POTUS did anything wrong. It is not against the law to appoint people who lie. Chance meetings and conversations aren't against the law either. There is absolutely no p of of wrongdoing.
 
Actually there is proof that he has done wrong

But not if you think lying is OK

There is no evidence that shows the POTUS broke any law. Everybody lies, sangha. Even you.
 
There is no evidence that shows the POTUS broke any law. Everybody lies, sangha. Even you.

You sure changed your tune from did nothing wrong to did nothing illegal

And I bet you have no shame at having to adopt such a low standard (Trump is not a criminal) for Trump. But hey, appointing a foreign agent to a position high in the USG is Not A Big Deal, amirite?

PS - there are laws against slander and defamation
 
I get it. You want to cripple Trump and then declare what a bad president he is.

The man has crippled himself with his Russian association that helped get him elected illegitimately.
 
Back
Top Bottom