EXCLUSIVE: Podesta Was Board Member Of Firms Linked To Russian Investors

[bubbabgone]

No, I do not have read anything to know what I already know (ie. that owning 20% of a company does not give you control over 20% of its assets)

Be brave - NYT article - 5th paragraph.

 

[Threegoofs]

Be brave - NYT article - 5th paragraph.

Oh boy.

If you're this concerned about a major campaign figure having a potential conflict with Russia, I hate to see how upset you'll be when you find out about Flynn, Manafort, etc.

 

[sangha]

Be brave - NYT article - 5th paragraph.

Umm, the 5th paragraph says nothing about controlling any uranium

 

[bubbabgone]

Umm, the 5th paragraph says nothing about controlling any uranium

Yes it does.
Reproduce it.

 

[sangha]

Yes it does.
Reproduce it.

You are making the claim. Too bad you cannot support it

PS - In addition to not saying what you think it says, what it does say is also wrong but if you want to stick to the it must be so because a journalist says it is so, DP has no rule prohibiting posters from stupid beliefs (for proof, see a Trump supporter)

 

[Threegoofs]

Yes it does.
Reproduce it.

Do you *ever* do your own homework??




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[bubbabgone]

You are making the claim. Too bad you cannot support it

PS - In addition to not saying what you think it says, what it does say is also wrong but if you want to stick to the it must be so because a journalist says it is so, DP has no rule prohibiting posters from stupid beliefs (for proof, see a Trump supporter)

What do YOU think it says?

 

[sangha]

What do YOU think it says?

You made the claim. Time to support it, if you can.

 

[bubbabgone]

You made the claim. Time to support it, if you can.

I did.
In the very first post of the thread.
Now ... what do YOU think it says?

 

[sangha]

I did.
In the very first post of the thread.
Now ... what do YOU think it says?

Citing something that does not support your claim is not supporting your claim.

I accept your surrender

 

[bubbabgone]

Citing something that does not support your claim is not supporting your claim.

I accept your surrender

Now you've relegated yourself to "Okay, that's what it says but that's not what it means."
You have GOT to be the weakest character around here.

 

[sangha]

Now you've relegated yourself to "Okay, that's what it says but that's not what it means."

No, that is not what it says.

The NYT article does not say the russians would control 20% of the uranium, which is why you CAN NOT quote the NYT saying that

 

[Threegoofs]

No, that is not what it says.

The NYT article does not say the russians would control 20% of the uranium, which is why you CAN NOT quote the NYT saying that

Hm. Weak character indeed.

 

[bubbabgone]

No, that is not what it says.

The NYT article does not say the russians would control 20% of the uranium, which is why you CAN NOT quote the NYT saying that

so what does it say?

 

[Paperview]

Debunked? No. The information mentioned in the OP is all factual. Talk about fantasies. Do you ever get tired of fantasizing that you win any exchange here?

No. The Daily Caller article is complete rubbish.

 

[Fishking]

No. The Daily Caller article is complete rubbish.

*shrug* All those things factually happened.

 

[Paperview]

*shrug* All those things factually happened.

You'd be wise to educate yourself.

Hillary Clinton campaign chief John Podesta has indirect Russia ties | McClatchy DC

Podesta, Putin, Trump, Gingrich, and Joule: WikiLeaks and the inside true story : Biofuels Digest

 

[Fishking]

You'd be wise to educate yourself.

Hillary Clinton campaign chief John Podesta has indirect Russia ties | McClatchy DC

Podesta, Putin, Trump, Gingrich, and Joule: WikiLeaks and the inside true story : Biofuels Digest

Did the Uranium One deal happen and did the Clinton Foundation get millions of dollars from said Russians after?

 

[Paperview]

Did the Uranium One deal happen and did the Clinton Foundation get millions of dollars from said Russians after?

How many times do we need to go over this?



Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?

false





http://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/16/trump-claims--falsely--that-clinton-gave-russia-20-of-us-uranium.html

[h=1]Donald Trump claims — falsely — that Hillary Clinton gave Russia 20% of US uranium[/h]

 

[Threegoofs]

How many times do we need to go over this?

]

Thats an easy one.

We have to go over this every two weeks until the Trump Russia affair drops out of the news.

 

[Fishking]

How many times do we need to go over this?

Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?

false




http://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/16/trump-claims--falsely--that-clinton-gave-russia-20-of-us-uranium.html

[h=1]Donald Trump claims — falsely — that Hillary Clinton gave Russia 20% of US uranium[/h]

All you had to do was say "yes". Yes the deal happened and the Clinton Foundation got millions.

 

[Paperview]

Thats an easy one.

We have to go over this every two weeks until the Trump Russia affair drops out of the news.

Amazing how some are so completely immune to facts.

 

[Moderate Right]

All you had to do was say "yes". Yes the deal happened and the Clinton Foundation got millions.

Funny how the Clinton Foundation totally collapsed after Hillary's loss. Nobody was going to pour millions and billions down the drain anymore knowing that they could no longer buy influence.

 

[Fishking]

Funny how the Clinton Foundation totally collapsed after Hillary's loss. Nobody was going to pour millions and billions down the drain anymore knowing that they could no longer buy influence.

Yeah...that was totally not suspicious at all. But hey, ignore that...look at this information that the incoming administration talked to the Russian ambassador during a time of high tension between our countries because that is totally unreasonable behavior!