• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Collusion

Glowpun

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
2,236
Reaction score
537
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Should it turn out that there was collusion between the Tramp campaign and the Russians to aid Trump to win the election, what will that do to Trump as the president?
 
Depending upon what that 'collusion' actually looked like, it would be devastating for him.
 
Should it turn out that there is no collusion between Russia and President Trump, will the Left's credibility and legitimacy be wrecked, permanently?
 
Should it turn out that there is no collusion between Russia and President Trump, will the Left's credibility and legitimacy be wrecked, permanently?

No, because the main pusher of this theory is the Centre-Right-Wing Democratic Establishment.
 
Should it turn out that there is no collusion between Russia and President Trump, will the Left's credibility and legitimacy be wrecked, permanently?

Nah, people are team/party players. Most will never change their mind despite how damning the evidence or lack thereof there is.
 
Should it turn out that there was collusion between the Tramp campaign and the Russians to aid Trump to win the election, what will that do to Trump as the president?

Impeached, removed from office, then prosecuted criminally in federal court. At least, that's what better happen. IF it turns out that he colluded. So far, we're light wears from proving that.
 
No, because the main pusher of this theory is the Centre-Right-Wing Democratic Establishment.

What? Who? From my observation it's the Progressive Left, and that's WAY to the left of those you just tagged. Plus, the type person you described is a rare specimen in the Democratic party, and I can't think of any, ANY, that are in power.
 
Nah, people are team/party players. Most will never change their mind despite how damning the evidence or lack thereof there is.

Which is why I believe the Libbos's credibility will be wrecked, permanently.
 
I doubt it would hurt Trump much more than he already is unless they could prove that Trump himself made a quid pro quo deal, which I doubt happened. Do I think Russia wanted Trump to win? Yes. Do I think the Russians leaked the emails to hurt Hillary and help Trump? Most likely. Do I think Trump asked them to do it? Highly unlikely. Do I think Russia's activities have lead Trump to viewing them more favorably? Yes.

But none of that would actually be collusion. Shady as ****, but not collusion.
 
What? Who? From my observation it's the Progressive Left, and that's WAY to the left of those you just tagged. Plus, the type person you described is a rare specimen in the Democratic party, and I can't think of any, ANY, that are in power.

Forget about fancy-pants titles and Democrats mounting faux-resistance to Trump in the Senate and House, the real power behind the DNC is the Clintons and Centre-Right.
 
Back
Top Bottom