Okie dokie, Give my regards to Leena...
I went out for a long run over lunch and though about this, and I can't let this slide. You argue that I am a hypocrite because in a thread about Lena Dunham, when another user made the following statement:
"She's more than a hippy, she sexually assaulted her infant sister. Liberals have absolute no morals!"
I responded with:
"Yes liberals all molest their younger siblings. Christ Almighty, what is wrong with some of yall? Where does such hate come from?"
So in this case, I was angered that liberals in general would be compared to someone that admitted to molesting her sister. No where in that statement am I justifying or defending anything about Lena Dunham. In fact, my disgust with her is so much that I am angered that liberals in general are being compared to her.
I did a search of the forums to see if I could find any other thread where I responded to a post about her, or mentioned her. I found a couple, here they are:
I said this about Lena Dunham -
She is a piece of **** too. Unlike some on here, I don't take into account someone's politics when I make a judgement call on anyone that defends child molestation.
That would be this post
https://www.debatepolitics.com/brea...tbart-news-post1066911750.html#post1066911750
I called her a horrible person here:
I can easily say the following people are horrible or corrupt people: Anthony Weiner, Sheila Jackson Lee, Charles Rangel, John Edwards, Lena Dunham, Alan Grayson... To name a few.
That would be in this post.
I searched through the forums for anytime I had ever referred to a pedophile in general, I found the following:
I think we should have child like sex robots for these pedos instead that will drag them out in front of a bus the first they try to molest it.
That would be in this post:
https://www.debatepolitics.com/sex-...-sex-dolls-post1066866681.html#post1066866681
As for what society should do with pedophiles, I have said the following on here:
My Mawmaw used to say that "some people just need a killin". If someone who commits a brutal rape of a prepubescent child does not "need a killin", then who in the hell does?
I mean come on, we are not talking about executing a drunk frat boy that bangs some 16 year old chick in a state with an age of consent of 17, we are talking about those who brutally rape a child. If you rape a child, I think its safe to say that you are not reformable. The primary purpose of executing a child rapist would not be to deter others from doing it, after all, if your compelled to rape a child, then no threat of punishment is probably going to deter you from doing so. In fact, executing a child rapist is really not even punishment. After all, all they have is hell to look forward to. What it is, is a statement. By executing them, we are saying is that as a society we don't have any use for a child rapist. We don't have any use for them out in society, hell we don't even have any use for them in prison. Its saying we just want to be rid of them, and putting them in the ground is the surest way of doing just that.
That would be in this post:
https://www.debatepolitics.com/arch...child-rape-post1057654834.html#post1057654834
So I have been very, very consistent about my feelings about child molesters and anyone that advocates or rationalizes for them.
Of course, in your 70,000 plus posts on here, I doubt you have ever admitted when you were wrong, and I doubt you will on this one either. I am just laying out the facts. Moreover, that was in no way "false outrage" on my part. There is nothing on earth in my view that is more deplorable than pedophile or a pederast.