• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Gay Right Wing Hero

But here's the thing:

Is he right? Is this a big thing in the gay community, and he simply chose to be "that guy" and cop to it in public? After all, it appears that George Takei basically had the same experience with this kind of thing that Milo did.

Secondly, how much "younger" is he talking, exactly? He doesn't specify in the interview. He might have meant more in the range of 16 or 17, not the "tweens" or younger everyone seems to be assuming.

Like I said, he has since come out and clarified that he is not at all in support of pedopholia.

He doesn't support pedophilia, just sex between adults and 13 year old boys. That's technically supporting pederasty and hebephilia.
 
https://www.facebook.com/myiannopoulos/posts/851826321621931




Doesn't count for anything with you? you see he's saying what I said about him, psychology of an abuse victim long before this came out.


He doesn't share all of my politics, and think he's nothing more than an entertaining troll. Honestly I've never listened to more than a couple minutes of him speaking. What I do know, is that abuse victims process thier abuse in different, and at times innappropriate ways. I'm showing a little empathy towards this.

So sad, after he glorifies child molestation, he sees that its going to cost him his entire livelihood, you know where he makes money off of being nothing more than a horrible person, and thus he gives the first apology he has ever given for anything in his entire life. What a saint....
 
So sad, after he glorifies child molestation, he sees that its going to cost him his entire livelihood, you know where he makes money off of being nothing more than a horrible person, and thus he gives the first apology he has ever given for anything in his entire life. What a saint....



Here's where you are shown to be a raging hack hypocrite.




She's more than a hippy, she sexually assaulted her infant sister. Liberals have absolute no morals!


Yes liberals all molest their younger siblings. Christ Almighty, what is wrong with some of yall? Where does such hate come from?



See leena dunham ACTUALLY committed sex abuse of a child you had no problem with it. you said nothing in that thread other than to protect "mein party" and liberals.


You have no standing with your faux outrage.
 
Here's where you are shown to be a raging hack hypocrite.








See leena dunham ACTUALLY committed sex abuse of a child you had no problem with it. you said nothing in that thread other than to protect "mein party" and liberals.


You have no standing with your faux outrage.

Are you ****ing kidding? Could you be more intellectually dishonest with that one? I did not say what Lena Dunham did was OK. I said that its wrong to equate some sick **** like her to all liberals. The vast majority of liberals have enough "morals" not to molest their siblings.

You will find no examples, none at all, of me ever excusing, justifying, or rationalizing anyone saying child molestation is OK.
 
Last edited:
Are you ****ing kidding? Could you be more intellectually dishonest with that one? I did not say what Lena Dunham did was OK. I said that its wrong to equate some sick **** like her to all liberals. The vast majority of liberals have enough "morals" not to molest their siblings.

You will find no examples, none at all, of me ever excusing, justifying, or rationalizing anyone saying child molestation is OK.

You said nothing about it. That's the point. you were more concerned with defending democrat honor than you were with saying she's an ACTUAL pedophile. you are far more eager to slam milo here, and those speaking a little realistic about the comments, than you were slamming Leena Dunham and those who made excuses for her.


Whats the difference?
 
Up until the last few days, I had no idea who this Lena Dunham chick is -- so I had to find for myself the source of where this was coming from.

And geezuz.

She was seven years old.

It was this passage she wrote in her book:

“Do we all have uteruses?” I asked my mother when I was seven.

“Yes,” she told me. “We’re born with them, and with all our eggs, but they start out very small. And they aren’t ready to make babies until we’re older.” I look at my sister, now a slim, tough one-year-old, and at her tiny belly. I imagined her eggs inside her, like the sack of spider eggs in Charlotte’s Webb, and her uterus, the size of a thimble.

“Does her vagina look like mine?”

“I guess so,” my mother said. “Just smaller.”

One day, as I sat in our driveway in Long Island playing with blocks and buckets, my curiosity got the best of me. Grace was sitting up, babbling and smiling, and I leaned down between her legs and carefully spread open her vagina. She didn’t resist and when I saw what was inside I shrieked.

My mother came running. “Mama, Mama! Grace has something in there!”

My mother didn’t bother asking why I had opened Grace’s vagina. This was within the spectrum of things I did. She just on her knees and looked for herself. It quickly became apparent that Grace had stuffed six or seven pebbles in there. My mother removed them patiently while Grace cackled, thrilled that her prank had been a success.
In A Sad Attempt To Defend Milo, The Right Is Once Again Calling Lena Dunham A Pedophile - The Daily Banter

THAT - that is what you are calling "child molestation" referring to her as a pedophile and comparable to Milo's NAMBA enabling?

Holy ****.
 
You said nothing about it. That's the point. you were more concerned with defending democrat honor than you were with saying she's an ACTUAL pedophile. you are far more eager to slam milo here, and those speaking a little realistic about the comments, than you were slamming Leena Dunham and those who made excuses for her.


Whats the difference?

OK, you are just blatantly intellectually dishonest on this one.

The thread was not even about Lena Dunham molesting her sister. It was about her going to Arizona for her supposed "post election anxiety". In the thread, a poster brought up the fact that she admitted to molesting her own sister and then equated her to all liberals. That is what I responded to by saying that it is wrong to equate her actions to all liberals.

For example, if someone in this thread said that Milo thinks child molestation is OK, thus all conservatives are cool with child molesting, and you responded with "what kind of a person says that all conservatives are cool with child molesting", then you would have had a comparable response to mine.

You didn't though, you went into a big rationalization of Milo said. That is something I have never done with anyone that advocated child molestation or excused it by claiming that some 13 year old kid can consent. So sorry dude, but you got yourself a very flawed comparison there. One thing you could never accuse me of is hypocrisy when it comes to defending an advocate of child molestation. I have 3 kids, and no ****in way will you ever find me excusing anything having to do with that no matter the politics involved. As a parent, for the life of me, I cannot understand anyone, under any circumstances, trying to rationalize what Milo said.
 
OK, you are just blatantly intellectually dishonest on this one.

The thread was not even about Lena Dunham molesting her sister. It was about her going to Arizona for her supposed "post election anxiety". In the thread, a poster brought up the fact that she admitted to molesting her own sister and then equated her to all liberals. That is what I responded to by saying that it is wrong to equate her actions to all liberals.

For example, if someone in this thread said that Milo thinks child molestation is OK, thus all conservatives are cool with child molesting, and you responded with "what kind of a person says that all conservatives are cool with child molesting", then you would have had a comparable response to mine.

You didn't though, you went into a big rationalization of Milo said. That is something I have never done with anyone that advocated child molestation or excused it by claiming that some 13 year old kid can consent. So sorry dude, but you got yourself a very flawed comparison there. One thing you could never accuse me of is hypocrisy when it comes to defending an advocate of child molestation. I have 3 kids, and no ****in way will you ever find me excusing anything having to do with that no matter the politics involved. As a parent, for the life of me, I cannot understand anyone, under any circumstances, trying to rationalize what Milo said.




Your outrage is fake.


You had no emotion, nor response regarding lenna dunham.


"rationalize"? I pointed out a well known psychological comcecpt when it comes to victims of sex abuse. he's even come out with an apology touching on this. he, unlike Leena Dunham never committed sex assault on a child.


I think your hypocrisy is exposed, and we are pretty much done here. Thanks for the conversation
 
Your outrage is fake.


You had no emotion, nor response regarding lenna dunham.


"rationalize"? I pointed out a well known psychological comcecpt when it comes to victims of sex abuse. he's even come out with an apology touching on this. he, unlike Leena Dunham never committed sex assault on a child.
Yes

I think your hypocrisy is exposed, and we are pretty much done here. Thanks for the conversation

You certainly get a gold star for intellectual dishonesty on this one.
 
Up until the last few days, I had no idea who this Lena Dunham chick is -- so I had to find for myself the source of where this was coming from.

And geezuz.

She was seven years old.

It was this passage she wrote in her book:

In A Sad Attempt To Defend Milo, The Right Is Once Again Calling Lena Dunham A Pedophile - The Daily Banter

THAT - that is what you are calling "child molestation" referring to her as a pedophile and comparable to Milo's NAMBA enabling?

Holy ****.

I didn't know her either and I did the same as you.

It's so sad of the lengths the cupcake l'll trumpettes will go to to defend the so-called president, lying liar l'll donny. :(
 
Okie dokie, Give my regards to Leena...

I went out for a long run over lunch and though about this, and I can't let this slide. You argue that I am a hypocrite because in a thread about Lena Dunham, when another user made the following statement:

"She's more than a hippy, she sexually assaulted her infant sister. Liberals have absolute no morals!"

I responded with:

"Yes liberals all molest their younger siblings. Christ Almighty, what is wrong with some of yall? Where does such hate come from?"

So in this case, I was angered that liberals in general would be compared to someone that admitted to molesting her sister. No where in that statement am I justifying or defending anything about Lena Dunham. In fact, my disgust with her is so much that I am angered that liberals in general are being compared to her.

I did a search of the forums to see if I could find any other thread where I responded to a post about her, or mentioned her. I found a couple, here they are:

I said this about Lena Dunham -

She is a piece of **** too. Unlike some on here, I don't take into account someone's politics when I make a judgement call on anyone that defends child molestation.
That would be this post https://www.debatepolitics.com/brea...tbart-news-post1066911750.html#post1066911750

I called her a horrible person here:

I can easily say the following people are horrible or corrupt people: Anthony Weiner, Sheila Jackson Lee, Charles Rangel, John Edwards, Lena Dunham, Alan Grayson... To name a few.
That would be in this post.

I searched through the forums for anytime I had ever referred to a pedophile in general, I found the following:

I think we should have child like sex robots for these pedos instead that will drag them out in front of a bus the first they try to molest it.
That would be in this post: https://www.debatepolitics.com/sex-...-sex-dolls-post1066866681.html#post1066866681

As for what society should do with pedophiles, I have said the following on here:

My Mawmaw used to say that "some people just need a killin". If someone who commits a brutal rape of a prepubescent child does not "need a killin", then who in the hell does?

I mean come on, we are not talking about executing a drunk frat boy that bangs some 16 year old chick in a state with an age of consent of 17, we are talking about those who brutally rape a child. If you rape a child, I think its safe to say that you are not reformable. The primary purpose of executing a child rapist would not be to deter others from doing it, after all, if your compelled to rape a child, then no threat of punishment is probably going to deter you from doing so. In fact, executing a child rapist is really not even punishment. After all, all they have is hell to look forward to. What it is, is a statement. By executing them, we are saying is that as a society we don't have any use for a child rapist. We don't have any use for them out in society, hell we don't even have any use for them in prison. Its saying we just want to be rid of them, and putting them in the ground is the surest way of doing just that.
That would be in this post: https://www.debatepolitics.com/arch...child-rape-post1057654834.html#post1057654834

So I have been very, very consistent about my feelings about child molesters and anyone that advocates or rationalizes for them.

Of course, in your 70,000 plus posts on here, I doubt you have ever admitted when you were wrong, and I doubt you will on this one either. I am just laying out the facts. Moreover, that was in no way "false outrage" on my part. There is nothing on earth in my view that is more deplorable than pedophile or a pederast.
 
...

I called her a horrible person here:

...
You and I are generally on the same side, but I'm having trouble with you calling a first grader who wanted to inspect her little sister's genitals (what most professionals would call mostly normal childhood behavior) "a horrible person."
 
You and I are generally on the same side, but I'm having trouble with you calling a first grader who wanted to inspect her little sister's genitals (what most professionals would call mostly normal childhood behavior) "a horrible person."

I understand where you are coming from, but I think its a ****ed up story for her to tell just the same.
 
I understand where you are coming from, but I think its a ****ed up story for her to tell just the same.

That she relayed what happens normally to many children as they grow up -- all across the world, and has happened since the beginning of time, and will continue to happen till the end of time? That makes her a "horrible person?"

Really?

Was i that she relayed it, or that she took part in what experts in the field say is generally normal childhood behavior?
 
Not my party at all. But, you obviously are upset over what Wright said, in a church no less.

Why do you hate the First Amendment?

That's nonsense and you know it.
 
That's nonsense and you know it.

No it's not. He is free to say whatever the hell he wants. You just don't like it. Tough.
 
So sad, after he glorifies child molestation, he sees that its going to cost him his entire livelihood, you know where he makes money off of being nothing more than a horrible person, and thus he gives the first apology he has ever given for anything in his entire life. What a saint....

Making a livelihood off being nothing more than an opionated ****head is a big reason i don't glorify capitalism the way so many here do
 
Christ on a cracker.

He's still thunderiing on about it.

"Lena Dunham did not sexually assault her sister. She was a seven year old kid who was curious about anatomy. Her mother had told her that girls had eggs inside of them and Dunham wanted to see if that was true. This is normal behavior. She was a child, not an adult or a teenager and that is a critical difference. "

In A Sad Attempt To Defend Milo, The Right Is Once Again Calling Lena Dunham A Pedophile - The Daily Banter

That is astounding. You would think by their verbiage that she was much older.:shock:

Have they never raised or a child with sexual curiosity? That was a moment for a parent to tell the child what was acceptable and what was not - without over accentuating the episode and causing harm to both children.

Milo was a young teen that as molested by an adult Priest. Whether a young sexually curious teen wanted the interaction is of no consequence. An adult who knew better molested him. The sad thing is that he clearly now promotes this as a viable option for gay children. He needs to get help and understand this is not something that should be accepted. As an adult, he should understand crimes were commited, This is not a situation where two people are near the same age. As a Priest, I would imagine he would have to be 22 or so at least.....and probably much older.
 
Back
Top Bottom