• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sean Spicer Loses It before Press Corps

Because the media still lied.

The numbers in attendance were lower than Obama, but they exaggerated the reality. One example was using 11 AM transit numbers. Trump's started at 11, Obama's three hours earlier. In Obama's count, it included numbers of the people leaving the event, doubling his estimate by the transit system numbers.

There would have been no issue if the media was honest.

So far honesty has not been part of the new administration. Donald has dinner last night with top repubs and told them 3 to 5 million people voted illegally or he would have won the popular vote. He is still obsessing over the fact that he did not win the popular vote. It's a lie.
 
No I didn't.

That was a figment of your imagination.

here it is from the other Spicer thread post 49


Quote Originally Posted by Lord of Planar View Post
It that whining?

No.

Why did you say "whining" in the OP?

Do you not care about your integrity?

I suggest you watch the whole press conference instead of letting pundits tell you what to regurgitate.

and my reply in that same post


How could i depend on what people tell me to say when I posted my thoughts in the middle of his conference before any pundits said a word?

Much of what Spicer did was progress and mending fences. I give him credit for that and getting off to a better start and reboot.

But the part I referred to came across to me like whining. If you don't see it that way - fine. But I gave you my honest reaction as it was unfolding long before any pundit chimed in with their opinion.

So why now would you deny it?
 
So far honesty has not been part of the new administration. Donald has dinner last night with top repubs and told them 3 to 5 million people voted illegally or he would have won the popular vote. He is still obsessing over the fact that he did not win the popular vote. It's a lie.

I don't see him "obsessing" over it. The democrats are the ones being obsessive over it. As ln as they don't let it go away, he has the right to respond to it.

I'd like t see he video of him saying that, s I can see full context.

At least the link of the blogger that told you that.
 
here it is from the other Spicer thread post 49




and my reply in that same post




So why now would you deny it?

I disagree you won, because whining was an improper use of wording.

Yes he complained.

He didn't whine.
 
Because it represented one among thousands of other hostile writings of thousands of reporters over the past two years. They are tired of the hostility and I for one, have stopped believing anything the press says about politics.

I whole heartily agree.

I already know that when ABC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, NYT, Huff & Puff, Salon, DailyKOS, and quite a few others, are reporting on politics, that it's stilted 1/2 truths, typically and subtly designed to denigrate, marginalize, minimize, delegitimize anything not toeing the liberal / progressive ideology, so in essence left wing propaganda; they have bankrupted their credibility, at least with me.

I have read posted here studies that have concluded that the majority of the electorate has similar levels of distrust of the left stream media. So clearly I'm not alone in coming to this conclusion.

Given that once trust is lost it's very hard to earn it back, that much of the electorate have lost trust in these, you'd think that the left stream media would alter their behaviors and stem the loss of trust, but I'm not seeing any indication of this. Seems that they are almost doubling down on the same'ol same'ol. Do they not realize that their futures are at stake here? You'd think they'd start catching a clue.
 
I don't see him "obsessing" over it. The democrats are the ones being obsessive over it. As ln as they don't let it go away, he has the right to respond to it.

I'd like t see he video of him saying that, s I can see full context.

At least the link of the blogger that told you that.

It's 2 and a half months since the election and he is still lying about it. He's obsessed
 
You so desperately attempt to get in the last word even though you have nothing substantive to say with it.

Sorry, your comedy is killing me.

Go ahead. Get the last word in since it's important to you. I should stop responding to lunacy.
 
Back
Top Bottom