• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Assembling the Wealthiest Cabinet

Absentglare

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 7, 2015
Messages
39,408
Reaction score
10,083
Location
California
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
Trump is assembling the wealthiest cabinet in modern history.

"The tradition goes back in history. Andrew Mellon, one of the wealthiest Americans in the early 20th century, served as treasury secretary under three administrations. ... Mellon was first appointed by President Warren G. Harding, and he helped steer the U.S. economy through the “Roaring Twenties” — and into the Great Depression.

He is widely credited with pioneering an early version of the tax policies that form part of Trump’s economic agenda, which proved successful in the 1920s. It was the notion that the government could speed up the economy — and increase federal revenue — by cutting taxes on the rich."

"“This isn’t a criticism or a conspiracy . . . but it’s important to recognize that everyone’s perspective and policy and government is shaped by the kind of life you’ve lived,” said Nicholas Carnes, a political scientist at Duke University. “The research really says that when you put a bunch of millionaires in charge, you can expect public policy that helps millionaires at the expense of everybody else.”"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/amph...est-administration-in-modern-american-history

He's not even done yet. Hopefully, Trump doesn't just **** over the working and middle classes.
 
Trump is assembling the wealthiest cabinet in modern history.

"The tradition goes back in history. Andrew Mellon, one of the wealthiest Americans in the early 20th century, served as treasury secretary under three administrations. ... Mellon was first appointed by President Warren G. Harding, and he helped steer the U.S. economy through the “Roaring Twenties” — and into the Great Depression.

He is widely credited with pioneering an early version of the tax policies that form part of Trump’s economic agenda, which proved successful in the 1920s. It was the notion that the government could speed up the economy — and increase federal revenue — by cutting taxes on the rich."

"“This isn’t a criticism or a conspiracy . . . but it’s important to recognize that everyone’s perspective and policy and government is shaped by the kind of life you’ve lived,” said Nicholas Carnes, a political scientist at Duke University. “The research really says that when you put a bunch of millionaires in charge, you can expect public policy that helps millionaires at the expense of everybody else.”"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/amph...est-administration-in-modern-american-history

He's not even done yet. Hopefully, Trump doesn't just **** over the working and middle classes.

What is good about this? These people know, what is holding back the economy in their very different necks of the wood.

This is different from the populist liberal knowledge of where someone would promise to give them their vote for a slice of someone else's cash. ;)
 
What is good about this? These people know, what is holding back the economy in their very different necks of the wood.

This is different from the populist liberal knowledge of where someone would promise to give them their vote for a slice of someone else's cash. ;)

That seems to be Trump's argument, and for our sakes, i do hope that that is true.

One argument i've heard that's fairly strong is that Trump will still be leading the cabinet, so the cabinet leaders themselves will still have limited influence.

I do contend your last point- it's not buying votes to help out the people you're elected to represent. A better example of buying votes is spending money to advertise lies about helping the working and middle classes while fully intending to screw them over.
 
This is a good thing. They obviously do not need K Street lobbying money.
 
Trump is assembling the wealthiest cabinet in modern history.

"The tradition goes back in history. Andrew Mellon, one of the wealthiest Americans in the early 20th century, served as treasury secretary under three administrations. ... Mellon was first appointed by President Warren G. Harding, and he helped steer the U.S. economy through the “Roaring Twenties” — and into the Great Depression.

He is widely credited with pioneering an early version of the tax policies that form part of Trump’s economic agenda, which proved successful in the 1920s. It was the notion that the government could speed up the economy — and increase federal revenue — by cutting taxes on the rich."

"“This isn’t a criticism or a conspiracy . . . but it’s important to recognize that everyone’s perspective and policy and government is shaped by the kind of life you’ve lived,” said Nicholas Carnes, a political scientist at Duke University. “The research really says that when you put a bunch of millionaires in charge, you can expect public policy that helps millionaires at the expense of everybody else.”"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/amph...est-administration-in-modern-american-history

He's not even done yet. Hopefully, Trump doesn't just **** over the working and middle classes.

He can't do any worse than Obama.
 
That seems to be Trump's argument, and for our sakes, i do hope that that is true.

One argument i've heard that's fairly strong is that Trump will still be leading the cabinet, so the cabinet leaders themselves will still have limited influence.

I do contend your last point- it's not buying votes to help out the people you're elected to represent. A better example of buying votes is spending money to advertise lies about helping the working and middle classes while fully intending to screw them over.

It was also the argument that got Joseph Kennedy his job at the SEC.

I would contest that fraud is vote buying. It's illegal, yes. But it isn't buying.
Promising benefits is.
 
This is a good thing. They obviously do not need K Street lobbying money.

Because they are the ones who pay lobbyists. It remains to be seen whose agenda they will be fighting for. I'll withhold judgement.
 
It was also the argument that got Joseph Kennedy his job at the SEC.

I would contest that fraud is vote buying. It's illegal, yes. But it isn't buying.
Promising benefits is.

Promising to help the working class, while gutting the meager benefits they receive, is, in fact, vote buying AND subsequent betrayal.
 
Cabinet members will ALWAYS be wealthy. Get over yourselves.

What do you expect? A cabinet full of Bubba's from the corner gas station? Shaniqualonda from McDonalds?
 
Because they are the ones who pay lobbyists. It remains to be seen whose agenda they will be fighting for. I'll withhold judgement.

Good point. :)
 
All of that success in one cabinet. The most successful bunch of appointees ever assembled in one cabinet. If you want to make bread you don't hire a mechanic, you hire a baker. If you want to boost an economy you hire business people. I am looking forward to the inauguration. Yay to Trump for speaking to the workers in the rust belt and the farmers and ranchers and not ignoring the middle class who voted for Trump and blowing through the "blue wall" that made it impossible for Clinton to lose that she ignored. MAGA.


In the excerpts from her paid speeches to financial institutions and corporate audiences, Mrs. Clinton said she dreamed of “open trade and open borders” throughout the Western Hemisphere. Citing the back-room deal-making and arm-twisting used by Abraham Lincoln, she mused on the necessity of having “both a public and a private position” on politically contentious issues. Reflecting in 2014 on the rage against political and economic elites that swept the country after the 2008 financial crash, Mrs. Clinton acknowledged that her family’s rising wealth had made her “kind of far removed” from the struggles of the middle class.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/politics/hillary-clinton-speeches-wikileaks.html?_r=0

If my post sounds rhetorical it is because it was meant to. I love irony.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom