• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Stuart Varney says Thank You to Jill Stein

vesper

vesper

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 28, 2013
Messages
25,834
Reaction score
25,190
Location
Ohio
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
It is being reported today that because of the recount in Michigan initiated by Jill Stein and backed by Clinton's campaign have discovered huge voting discrepancies in the Detroit precincts where Hillary overwhelmingly won. The evidence is so great that Michigan is now calling for an audit of the Detroit precincts. Evidently there are way too many votes and not enough voters.

 
Lol...everyone knows that if any real digging into the election process is done any significant voter fraud that could be found will be in favor of Democrats. So in they forgot about that fact in their rabid anti-Trump mental disorders and ended up exposing themselves, lol. Priceless.
 
vesper said:
It is being reported today that because of the recount in Michigan initiated by Jill Stein and backed by Clinton's campaign have discovered huge voting discrepancies in the Detroit precincts where Hillary overwhelmingly won. The evidence is so great that Michigan is now calling for an audit of the Detroit precincts. Evidently there are way too many votes and not enough voters.

Click to expand...
Stuart tells us voting irregularities. Really? Do you have some details on that, Stuart? How many votes we talking about here? And why were you not asking about the manufacturers of the scanning machine? Why were these machines not working the way they were supposed to? The secretary Ruth Johnson hasn't even completed the investigation yet and here you are, Mr. Varney, handing out sentences.

Amazing! Atypical Fox News reporting. I don't think you or your opposite partner MSNBC will ever change. :failpail:
 
Bob N said:
Stuart tells us voting irregularities. Really? Do you have some details on that, Stuart? How many votes we talking about here? And why were you not asking about the manufacturers of the scanning machine? Why were these machines not working the way they were supposed to? The secretary Ruth Johnson hasn't even completed the investigation yet and here you are, Mr. Varney, handing out sentences.

Amazing! Atypical Fox News reporting. I don't think you or your opposite partner MSNBC will ever change. :failpail:
Click to expand...

I thought his commentary along with that sh*t eating grin was priceless.
 
vesper said:
I thought his commentary along with that sh*t eating grin was priceless.
Click to expand...
It means as much to me as watching Rachel Maddow try to make a unsubstantiated opinion while tapping her ink pen. :sarcasticclap
 
Bob N said:
Mostly all I seen was percentages. But it gave more detail than Mr. Varney did in his diatribe. If scanners were not working correctly why would this be any political party's fault?
Click to expand...

I don't think we should be too focused on which political party did it. It happened. If Russians have the ability to rig an election to an extent, then people at home are even more capable and liable to do it.

On topic: I thank Jill Stein for her efforts to expose the electioneering by both parties (the Republicans via Russian interference, and the Democrats via voter fraud)...
 
Abbazorkzog said:
I don't think we should be too focused on which political party did it. It happened. If Russians have the ability to rig an election to an extent, then people at home are even more capable and liable to do it.

On topic: I thank Jill Stein for her efforts to expose the electioneering by both parties (the Republicans via Russian interference, and the Democrats via voter fraud)...
Click to expand...
Democrats have not been found guilty of any voter fraud and the GOP didn't assist the Russians in interference. Do you know of any completed investigations that I don't know of?
 
Bob N said:
GOP didn't assist the Russians in interference.
Click to expand...

They did when they began their row with the CIA over the simple fact that "they didn't like what they were saying". If the GOP is now actively trying to propel Trump into the WH despite intelligence briefings indicating that Russian agents - rogue or otherwise - swayed the election against Clinton, then they are, indeed, assisting the Russians. As for voter fraud, you may be correct, but WikiLeaks, like it or not - and whether they did it with ulterior motives or not - exposed the DNC actively worked to undermine the campaign of Bernie Sanders over the simple fact that he wasn't a Democrat.

Both major parties have been especially nefarious in this election, borderline evil really.
 
Abbazorkzog said:
They did when they began their row with the CIA over the simple fact that "they didn't like what they were saying". If the GOP is now actively trying to propel Trump into the WH despite intelligence briefings indicating that Russian agents - rogue or otherwise - swayed the election against Clinton, then they are, indeed, assisting the Russians. As for voter fraud, you may be correct, but WikiLeaks, like it or not - and whether they did it with ulterior motives or not - exposed the DNC actively worked to undermine the campaign of Bernie Sanders over the simple fact that he wasn't a Democrat.

Both major parties have been especially nefarious in this election, borderline evil really.
Click to expand...

There is no evidence.
The CIA was called to the house to submit a breifing.

They canceled as they have no evidence to support themselves.
 
Bob N said:
Democrats have not been found guilty of any voter fraud and the GOP didn't assist the Russians in interference. Do you know of any completed investigations that I don't know of?
Click to expand...

I heard the Benghazi investigation and final report just wrapped up.

I guess no matter how hard and how long you stonewall, delay, misdirect, obscure, eventually it'll all be run to ground.
 
eohrnberger said:
I heard the Benghazi investigation and final report just wrapped up.

I guess no matter how hard and how long you stonewall, delay, misdirect, obscure, eventually it'll all be run to ground.
Click to expand...
OK. What were the results of it? Who is going to jail for it?
 
vesper said:
It is being reported today that because of the recount in Michigan initiated by Jill Stein and backed by Clinton's campaign have discovered huge voting discrepancies in the Detroit precincts where Hillary overwhelmingly won. The evidence is so great that Michigan is now calling for an audit of the Detroit precincts. Evidently there are way too many votes and not enough voters.

Click to expand...


Too funny! This reminds me of a retail store I worked in once where we had a drawing for a free VCR. After the drawing one person complained that the drawing was rigged and that the winner must have stuffed the drawing box, against the rules. After the boss and myself looked through every single entry in the box we discovered that the drawing box was indeed stuffed - by the person who was making the complaint. He had so many entries in there I guess he figured that there was no way he could lose.
 
Abbazorkzog said:
I don't think we should be too focused on which political party did it. It happened. If Russians have the ability to rig an election to an extent, then people at home are even more capable and liable to do it.

On topic: I thank Jill Stein for her efforts to expose the electioneering by both parties (the Republicans via Russian interference, and the Democrats via voter fraud)...
Click to expand...

Why would you bring the Russians into this discussion?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom