• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Long term credibility of someone who takes problematic political sides

Is long term credibility at risk because of support for controversial candidates?

  • Yes. They harm their own credibility and image

    Votes: 1 33.3%
  • No. People have sort memories in politics most of the time

    Votes: 1 33.3%
  • Not among their own party members

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It depends/other: explain

    Votes: 1 33.3%

  • Total voters
    3

Smeagol

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
4,147
Reaction score
1,694
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
In 2008 I was, to put it mildly, surprised by a non-politician faith-based media guy who I deeply admired dedicate a broadcast on the dangers of electing Senator Barack Obama to the White House. The broadcast lead-in was made up of clips from some sort of out of control protest with chants similar to "no justice, no peace" followed by a man on the street talking into the microphone who said "We gonna turn the White House into the Black House." I saw this is nothing more than deliberately inciting racial fear. I have never looked at him the same way since, despite dedicating an entire week of broadcasts to Tony Dungy, Dr. Tony Evans, JC Watts or whoever it was and what great guys they are the following day.

In 2012 there were some very controversial comments made by prominent Republicans on the difference between "legitimate rape" and "regular rape." Rape sometimes being God's will. A female college who under employer controlled health care (which, by the way I oppose,) lamented women like her could be denied oral contraceptive treatment even if for conditions like ovarian cysts and endometriosis with a public response demanding that pornography videos be produced featuring the college student for the entire American public to view since her employer would directly pay for her healthcare benefits as part of her compensation, instead of including that in HER compensation and letting her pick her own healthcare service.

Yes, there were individual denunciations. However, this and so many other incidents and statements made on a host of levels including race-relations, double standards on policy issues; gloating over inner-city violent crime, especially in Chicago; celebrating when America looses to Rio in the 2016 Olympics because the host city would have been Chicago, the home town of the President they despise, essentially cheering against America. This all indicates, in my view the party has a serious culture problem. Because of this, I decided to hold most republican office seekers accountable to the culture of the republican party until it is healed.

Do you think the candidates for either party suffer long-term credibility problems when they loyally stand with other candidates or even a political party that becomes a powder keg of controversy?
 
Last edited:
In 2008 I was, to put it mildly, surprised by a non-politician faith-based media guy who I deeply admired dedicate a broadcast on the dangers of electing Senator Barack Obama to the White House. The broadcast lead-in was made up of clips from some sort of out of control protest with chants similar to "no justice, no peace" followed by a man on the street talking into the microphone who said "We gonna turn the White House into the Black House." I saw this is nothing more than deliberately inciting racial fear. I have never looked at him the same way since, despite dedicating an entire week of broadcasts to Tony Dungy, Dr. Tony Evans, JC Watts or whoever it was and what great guys they are the following day.

In 2012 there were some very controversial comments made by prominent Republicans on the difference between "legitimate rape" and "regular rape." Rape sometimes being God's will. A female college who under employer controlled health care (which, by the way I oppose,) lamented women like her could be denied oral contraceptive treatment even if for conditions like ovarian cysts and endometriosis with a public response demanding that pornography videos be produced featuring the college student for the entire American public to view since her employer would directly pay for her healthcare benefits as part of her compensation, instead of including that in HER compensation and letting her pick her own healthcare service.

Yes, there were individual denunciations. However, this and so many other incidents and statements made on a host of levels including race-relations, double standards on policy issues; gloating over inner-city violent crime, especially in Chicago; celebrating when America looses to Rio in the 2016 Olympics because the host city would have been Chicago, the home town of the President they despise, essentially cheering against America. This all indicates, in my view the party has a serious culture problem. Because of this, I decided to hold most republican office seekers accountable to the culture of the republican party until it is healed.

Do you think the candidates for either party suffer long-term credibility problems when they loyally stand with other candidates or even a political party that becomes a powder keg of controversy?

The only redeeming factor is that there was no good candidate in the race.
 
When it comes to a position like POTUS a persons entire record is ruffled through so in that sense it can be very damaging. Local elections it depends.
 
Back
Top Bottom