• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gold Star families sue Clinton to court for defamation and the infliction of distress

Re: Gold Star families sue Clinton to court for defamation and the infliction of dist

I hate these threads. If "your" candidate is worth electing, then you should be promoting them, not just trying to tear down the opposition. If "your" opponent is so weak that the only way you think that they can be elected is to make them seem less bad than the other guy, then there's a huge problem with your candidate.

And where has Kobie said that Hillary is "his" candidate?


Anyway, the premise is absurd for a political debate forum. It is in no way improper to criticize politically-related things as improper. It wouldn't be a debate forum if everybody just posted about things they liked and never criticized the things they didn't like.

If anything can be considered improper, it's when posters jump into a thread negative of one candidate or party and immediately try to change the subject to the other candidate or party, usually without even trying to draw an analogy; it's just "look, this other thing is bad! Don't talk about the first thing!"
 
Re: Gold Star families sue Clinton to court for defamation and the infliction of dist

And where has Kobie said that Hillary is "his" candidate?


Anyway, the premise is absurd for a political debate forum. It is in no way improper to criticize politically-related things as improper. It wouldn't be a debate forum if everybody just posted about things they liked and never criticized the things they didn't like.

If anything can be considered improper, it's when posters jump into a thread negative of one candidate or party and immediately try to change the subject to the other candidate or party, usually without even trying to draw an analogy; it's just "look, this other thing is bad! Don't talk about the first thing!"

My point is that most threads about the two candidates are not about trying to communicate why you should vote for them, but rather why shouldn't vote for the the other one... Are these two candidates so weak that all we can do is essentially say "Don't for the other one." and can't point to why you should for vote for "your" candidate???
 
Re: Gold Star families sue Clinton to court for defamation and the infliction of dist

Because almost everyone wants money.

Except you and i.

All the money in the world can't by back your lost child or compensate you for the loss.
 
Re: Gold Star families sue Clinton to court for defamation and the infliction of dist

Hillary Clinton sued by parents of Benghazi victims - Washington Times


I wonder how they (Clinton and the press) are going treat these Gold Star families.

Much better than Trump and his supporters have treated the Kahn's. I have no doubt about that. You will get a few very kookish lefties that no one listens too that will attack them, but from Hillary, her campaign, and the main stream media and main stream liberal media you will hear nothing like what has been thrown at the Kahns.
 
Re: Gold Star families sue Clinton to court for defamation and the infliction of dist

Much better than Trump and his supporters have treated the Kahn's. I have no doubt about that. You will get a few very kookish lefties that no one listens too that will attack them, but from Hillary, her campaign, and the main stream media and main stream liberal media you will hear nothing like what has been thrown at the Kahns.

Right, sure, okay.
 
Back
Top Bottom