• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'I Don't Want Justice': Politico Founder Wants President Biden Even If He's A Sexual Predator

notquiteright said:
Robertinfremont and some ENSinSeattle. You can't be serious about no idea about how the elderly rabid right spout off in here and still want to claim you think you know about some 'unspoken attitude' on the left... :roll:

One thing I have noticed in everyone is uber brave sitting at a keyboard so they dare quite a bit... ;)

Well if it's candor you wish, then I'd say you need to admit this is more driven by your bias than any observed attitude... :peace
Click to expand...

It's driven by my observations.
I've observed that someone claiming a Trump cult probably belongs to an anti-Trump cult and their age isn't predictive.
Another observation is that the refusal to acknowledge what anyone can recognize about certain candidates serves to support the attitude shown by the subject of this thread.
Have you observed that too? Have you participated in it?
 
bubbabgone said:
I don't care.
Go for it ... again.
The point was to call attention to the unspoken (until now) political posturing that you haven't addressed.
Click to expand...

you should push for investigations into Trump too. that would show integrity.
 
Lutherf said:
The last time the media decided to investigate an allegation against Trump the accuser suggested that rape was sexy.
Click to expand...

do you want investigations into Trump's sexual assault allegations?
 
bubbabgone said:
‘I Don’t Want Justice’: Politico Founder Wants President Biden Even If He’s A Sexual Predator | The Daily Caller

Finally. Someone with some juice comes clean about what many have been thinking but weren't honest enough to say.
Click to expand...

I'm ignoring all of them. Trump's, Kavanaugh's, Biden's and who knows how many more. All this is is one political party going after the other party's candidates or nominees. I don't care. All I know is I'm very tired of the current presidents obnoxious, uncouth, very distasteful persona, his very unpresidential behavior who throws temper tantrums and calls others names like a four year old spoiled brat who's parents forgot to teach him any manners.

I've never seen someone so disrespect the office of the president as Trump has. He belongs with his schoolyard bullying personality as a wrestler in the WWE. Not in the Oval Office. I could agree 100% with his policies and I still wouldn't vote for him. Time to get this thin skin, egotistical, feud creating spoiled brat out of the White House.

Be advised, it's not his policies I voting against, it is the man himself.
 
CaughtInThe said:
you should push for investigations into Trump too. that would show integrity.
Click to expand...

Why are you avoiding what Tolchin said?
You agree with him but you'd rather not say?
You think it would reflect badly on you?
 
bubbabgone said:
It's driven by my observations. I've observed that someone claiming a Trump cult probably belongs to an anti-Trump cult and their age isn't predictive. Another observation is that the refusal to acknowledge what anyone can recognize about certain candidates serves to support the attitude shown by the subject of this thread. Have you observed that too? Have you participated in it?
Click to expand...

Well in order for observations to be reliable the observer must be bias free... not easily done on this subject. tRump and Spicer saw the largest crowds ever for an inauguration- EVER... I believe Ms Conway tried the phrase 'alternate facts'... how biased free do you think you are? How reliable the observations?

But you seem to ignore my observation that on BOTH sides of The Don men over a certain age seem to go over the top in their ahhh ardor I suppose is the best term. I have a difficult time believing you haven't noticed Robert or ENS, they are prolific posters AND very outspoken.

The last part is too vague to render an opinion about, perhaps you could try rephrasing it... I'd opine that when someone sees some 'unspoken' thing and claims people who aren't saying something really mean whatever the 'observer' imagines it might be something we call the 'observer's imagination. I mean, where does someone claiming to see an unspoken thought ever hold up except in the camp of that cult??? :peace
 
bubbabgone said:
Why are you avoiding what Tolchin said? You agree with him but you'd rather not say? You think it would reflect badly on you?
Click to expand...

I think you are trying to put words in other people's mouths. Tolchin speaks for Tolchin. Unlike Spicer and Conway he isn't the spokesperson for anyone or any group. I find it odd you seem to think liberals are some how in silent agreement with one old man. Perhaps there is a feeling the tRump camp has made this deal with a known no morals pitchman, who while repugnant to many on the social rabid right, delivers judges and tax cuts. There maybe a feeling of no matter what allegation arises (and has arisen) the rabid right will vote for tRump no matter what... :confused:

Has that burr been rubbing under certain saddles to the point they claim an 'observation' of 'unspoken' agreement equal to the blind tRump following??? :peace
 
notquiteright said:
Well in order for observations to be reliable the observer must be bias free... not easily done on this subject. tRump and Spicer saw the largest crowds ever for an inauguration- EVER... I believe Ms Conway tried the phrase 'alternate facts'... how biased free do you think you are? How reliable the observations?
Click to expand...
The inauguration crowd size? What the hell?

But you seem to ignore my observation that on BOTH sides of The Don men over a certain age seem to go over the top in their ahhh ardor I suppose is the best term. I have a difficult time believing you haven't noticed Robert or ENS, they are prolific posters AND very outspoken.
Click to expand...

I've noticed robertinfremont and a seattle-something, for sure, but I never concluded anything about their age and I never assigned any particular easily recognizable proprietary identity to the screen name "Robert" like I would to, say, someone who calls himself "Barack".
But I've certainly noticed the anti-Trump cult counts many members in the "over a certain age" crowd because they've said so.
Is that your point? Left & Right old-timers are an excitable bunch?
Could be, but I don't know how old DP members are and while many of the ones on the Left seem particularly excitable I'll not bother speculating about their ages if they don't disclose it.

The last part is too vague to render an opinion about, perhaps you could try rephrasing it... I'd opine that when someone sees some 'unspoken' thing and claims people who aren't saying something really mean whatever the 'observer' imagines it might be something we call the 'observer's imagination. I mean, where does someone claiming to see an unspoken thought ever hold up except in the camp of that cult??? :peace
Click to expand...

"Another observation is that the refusal to acknowledge what anyone can recognize about certain candidates serves to support the attitude shown by the subject of this thread. Have you observed that too? Have you participated in it?" - refers to Joe Biden's obvious mental problems. And the "refusal to acknowledge what anyone can recognize" [his mental problems] is what supports "the attitude shown by the subject of this thread."
So I asked if you observed that also ... and if you possibly have also avoided acknowledging of his problem.
Have you?
 
notquiteright said:
I think you are trying to put words in other people's mouths. Tolchin speaks for Tolchin. Unlike Spicer and Conway he isn't the spokesperson for anyone or any group. I find it odd you seem to think liberals are some how in silent agreement with one old man. Perhaps there is a feeling the tRump camp has made this deal with a known no morals pitchman, who while repugnant to many on the social rabid right, delivers judges and tax cuts. There maybe a feeling of no matter what allegation arises (and has arisen) the rabid right will vote for tRump no matter what... :confused:

Has that burr been rubbing under certain saddles to the point they claim an 'observation' of 'unspoken' agreement equal to the blind tRump following??? :peace
Click to expand...

Yes. That reply wasn't to you, but since you brought it up I think the Left is [so far] in silent agreement with Tolchin. If you don't agree, pay closer attention to those campaigning for the VP nomination.
But personally, I'd be concerned with Biden's mental state more than his peculiar and possibly illegal personal activities [until more is known].
His mental state is something that isn't a political issue. At least it shouldn't be.
 
bubbabgone said:
The inauguration crowd size? What the hell? I've noticed robertinfremont and a seattle-something, for sure, but I never concluded anything about their age and I never assigned any particular easily recognizable proprietary identity to the screen name "Robert" like I would to, say, someone who calls himself "Barack". But I've certainly noticed the anti-Trump cult counts many members in the "over a certain age" crowd because they've said so.
Is that your point? Left & Right old-timers are an excitable bunch? Could be, but I don't know how old DP members are and while many of the ones on the Left seem particularly excitable I'll not bother speculating about their ages if they don't disclose it. ]"Another observation is that the refusal to acknowledge what anyone can recognize about certain candidates serves to support the attitude shown by the subject of this thread. Have you observed that too? Have you participated in it?" - refers to Joe Biden's obvious mental problems. And the "refusal to acknowledge what anyone can recognize" [his mental problems] is what supports "the attitude shown by the subject of this thread." So I asked if you observed that also ... and if you possibly have also avoided acknowledging of his problem.
Have you?
Click to expand...

The crowd size shows how biased and political some 'observations' can be, no way in hell was that crowd the biggest ever as tRump and Spicer claimed.

Your noticing of Robert and Seattle again shows how flawed some observations can be. I knew how old they were and so I used them as an example of how advanced years can push someone to be hyper partisan, do you remember Navy Pride and how adamant he was on everything from women in sports to e-vile dems???

Interesting you claim to not know rabid right ages but sure know the liberal's ages... ;)

Yes apparently there is a lot you don't know about people yet that doesn't stop your 'observations' now does it?

Well finally you are stepping up and saying what you mean instead of the timid beating around the political rumor bush...

Biden gaffes- blamed on age. Obama Gaffes blamed on a lack of education. The Don's extremely limited vocabulary and almost childish repeating of idiotic phrases, his constant lying, even when the truth is a better bet- the list of reasons for that can fill a book.

Do you remember Reagan's claims to not remember anything about Iran-Contra??? Some now say it could be the truth due to his Alzheimer's. But at the time no one was claiming that.

I'd say you and your observations about Biden are politically driven. You can easily make a case for mental instability in the current occupant of the White House.

But like not knowing the rabid right ages, you don't seem to want to address that, my observation is due to political partisanship... :peace
 
bubbabgone said:
Yes. That reply wasn't to you, but since you brought it up I think the Left is [so far] in silent agreement with Tolchin. If you don't agree, pay closer attention to those campaigning for the VP nomination. But personally, I'd be concerned with Biden's mental state more than his peculiar and possibly illegal personal activities [until more is known]. His mental state is something that isn't a political issue. At least it shouldn't be.
Click to expand...

You 'think' something no one else has said, written, or blinked to the public is good enough for you...

Perhaps you think this because the social and fiscal conservatives have put winning before their supposed principles.

The Don has spent a lifetime playing fast and loose with other people's money- who is surprised he is doing the same with the federal budget?

tRump has a history of immoral behavior but as long as he appoints conservative judges, the social conservatives ignore the man's shameful past.

Everyone who believes all men are created equal should be given pause when The Orange Guy tap dances around blatant racism and some 'very good people'.

He paid shush money to porn stars and brags about grabbing *****- yet the rabid right holds their noses and votes for a reptile.

Perhaps that more than some observation about the left drives your opinion. You think the left will do it because the right did... :peace
 
notquiteright said:
The crowd size shows how biased and political some 'observations' can be, no way in hell was that crowd the biggest ever as tRump and Spicer claimed.
Click to expand...

From the pictures I saw, it certainly wasn't the biggest crowd ever. But I wouldn't conclude they actually observed that it was. They just said it was.

Your noticing of Robert and Seattle again shows how flawed some observations can be. I knew how old they were and so I used them as an example of how advanced years can push someone to be hyper partisan, do you remember Navy Pride and how adamant he was on everything from women in sports to e-vile dems???
Click to expand...

Nope. I don't recall any comments from any of them about their age. I guess I missed it. I do have someone in mind who actually loves to talk about his age and what a wonderful mind he has ... and he's hyper partisan on the Left.
But if your point is that hyper-partisanship is the sole province of age, or somewhat a province of age, then based on what I see on this site the most vocal here should self-quarantine forever.

Interesting you claim to not know rabid right ages but sure know the liberal's ages... ;)

Yes apparently there is a lot you don't know about people yet that doesn't stop your 'observations' now does it?
Click to expand...
I might notice their age if I have extended contact with someone.
Like I'm trying to tell you, you're the one who puts a peculiar emphasis on their age as a critical factor in your observations.
My observations are based on what they actually say ... not how old I imagine they are.

Well finally you are stepping up and saying what you mean instead of the timid beating around the political rumor bush...

Biden gaffes- blamed on age. Obama Gaffes blamed on a lack of education. The Don's extremely limited vocabulary and almost childish repeating of idiotic phrases, his constant lying, even when the truth is a better bet- the list of reasons for that can fill a book.

Do you remember Reagan's claims to not remember anything about Iran-Contra??? Some now say it could be the truth due to his Alzheimer's. But at the time no one was claiming that.

I'd say you and your observations about Biden are politically driven. You can easily make a case for mental instability in the current occupant of the White House.

But like not knowing the rabid right ages, you don't seem to want to address that, my observation is due to political partisanship... :peace
Click to expand...

We could address each of your examples but is there really a point since you can't even bring yourself to acknowledge Biden's mental impairment as if anyone his age will screw up that often.
It suggests your own observations might be politically driven.
 
notquiteright said:
You 'think' something no one else has said, written, or blinked to the public is good enough for you...

Perhaps you think this because the social and fiscal conservatives have put winning before their supposed principles.

The Don has spent a lifetime playing fast and loose with other people's money- who is surprised he is doing the same with the federal budget?

tRump has a history of immoral behavior but as long as he appoints conservative judges, the social conservatives ignore the man's shameful past.

Everyone who believes all men are created equal should be given pause when The Orange Guy tap dances around blatant racism and some 'very good people'.

He paid shush money to porn stars and brags about grabbing *****- yet the rabid right holds their noses and votes for a reptile.

Perhaps that more than some observation about the left drives your opinion. You think the left will do it because the right did... :peace
Click to expand...

Do think the comments about Joe Biden by those auditioning for the VP position are sincere and built on principle or are they partisan?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom