• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Buttigieg busts out to first place in Iowa


Nothing stays the same. Times change and so do opinions on same sex marriage...

"...Support for allowing gays and lesbians to marry legally also has steadily risen across racial and ethnic groups. Six-in-ten or more whites (64%) and Hispanics (60%) say they favor allowing same-sex couples to be married legally. In 2007, just 38% of whites and 37% of Hispanics supported same-sex marriage.

Although blacks remain less likely than whites and Hispanics to favor allowing gays and lesbians to marry, the share who favor gay marriage has also dramatically increased over the past decade: Today 51% of blacks support same-sex marriage; in 2007, just 26% did so...."

Support for Same-Sex Marriage Grows, Even Among Groups That Had Been Skeptical | Pew Research Center

Public opinion of same-sex marriage in the United States - Wikipedia

https://www.publicpolicypolling.com...017/09/PPP_Release_miscellaneousNC_051712.pdf

Latinos’ changing views of same-sex marriage | Pew Research Center

1_31.png
 
Are you speaking of Michelle, if she were receptive? Now that would be some ticket!

what exactly qualifies Michelle to be president? (Yeah she is native born and over 35)
 
Nothing stays the same. Times change and so do opinions on same sex marriage...

Except the issue isn't same sex marriage, it's electing the president of the united states. Bigotry comes in different levels and letting two gay people marry is way, way below electing a gay man to the most powerful political position in the world.
 
Except the issue isn't same sex marriage, it's electing the president of the united states. Bigotry comes in different levels and letting two gay people marry is way, way below electing a gay man to the most powerful political position in the world.

It was you that said Blacks and Hispanics wouldn't vote for a homosexual, remember? Well, Buttigeig just happens to be a married homosexual and the polls show that opinions on same sex marriage has evolved in the Black and Hispanic community's to the point where Buttigieg's same sex marriage shouldn't be a problem should he win the nomination.
 
If we see Pete poll well in NH and Nevada

Nevada - slowly moving up - only up to 8% now... but hey, something is happening in NH... He is now in 2nd place along with Warren and Sanders, only 5% behind Biden, and importantly, the only one with momentum, i.e. numbers moving higher among front runners

Update... Looks like Pete is ahead in NH now even more than in Iowa... Whoop!

Ok, maybe not the "best" survey but (a) it's the latest one at least and (b) in same earlier survey it matched closely an A+ survey from same period...

ss1.jpg
 
Except the issue isn't same sex marriage, it's electing the president of the united states. Bigotry comes in different levels and letting two gay people marry is way, way below electing a gay man to the most powerful political position in the world.

We got Dubya. We countered with a mulatto with an Arabian name. We got Trump. Time to counter.
 
Update...

Buttigieg has lost a lot of ground in NH apparently in latest poll

ss2.jpg

But... is now in 2nd place Nationally

ss1.jpg
 
I personally doubt mayor Pete's ability to win Iowa, the Democratic nomination or the presidency. In Iowa he has done very well so far by focusing his efforts on the state, and garnering the whiter, more rural support, however I don't think he will be able to beat Bernie Sander's ground efforts as Bernie has a large amount of energized supports. Furthermore Pete's 'honeymoon' of gaining support and getting lots of positive media attention is ending as rival candidates see him as a threat, Iowa is also a caucus which favors Bernie. I could see Pete coming a solid second, but if he wants to be the nominee he must come first, and I don't see that happening. The main reason I find him unlikely to win the nomination or the presidency is because his minority support is abysmal. I quite like some aspects of his campaign myself, as I am a centrist, but if a centrist is going to win the Democratic nomination it's going to be Biden, despite his rubbish debate performances and awful gaffes.
 
I personally doubt mayor Pete's ability to win Iowa, the Democratic nomination or the presidency. In Iowa he has done very well so far by focusing his efforts on the state, and garnering the whiter, more rural support, however I don't think he will be able to beat Bernie Sander's ground efforts as Bernie has a large amount of energized supports. Furthermore Pete's 'honeymoon' of gaining support and getting lots of positive media attention is ending as rival candidates see him as a threat, Iowa is also a caucus which favors Bernie. I could see Pete coming a solid second, but if he wants to be the nominee he must come first, and I don't see that happening. The main reason I find him unlikely to win the nomination or the presidency is because his minority support is abysmal. I quite like some aspects of his campaign myself, as I am a centrist, but if a centrist is going to win the Democratic nomination it's going to be Biden, despite his rubbish debate performances and awful gaffes.

If Bernie becomes the nominee, Dems will be blown out.
 
It looks like do or die for Mayor Pete tonight. He has slipped a bit in Iowa and is well off the pace in New Hampshire. If he cannot get some traction from this debate, he looks to be the first of the big four to fold.

That said, he has done well for a small city mayor. Down the road, Senator or Governor are not out of the question.
 
Trump (liar, adulterer, doesn't pay his bills, pays off a porn worker, uses federal bankruptcy protection, had to be bailed out by daddy multiple times, tweets like a 16 year old girl who was just dumped, has middle school nicknames for other adults and tries to take personal property via eminent domain in multiple countries) won the presidency with almost more votes and a lot of people are worried about Pete being gay.

That's totally messed up.

Our grand kids have a whole lot of mess to clean up after our generation, the Animal House generation, is dead and gone.
 
It looks like do or die for Mayor Pete tonight. He has slipped a bit in Iowa and is well off the pace in New Hampshire. If he cannot get some traction from this debate, he looks to be the first of the big four to fold.

That said, he has done well for a small city mayor. Down the road, Senator or Governor are not out of the question.

Bookmaker top American Offshore sports book-

DEMOCRATIC IOWA CAUCUS WINNER

1) Bernie Sanders +107
2) Joe Biden+186
3) Pete Buttigieg+448
4) Elizabeth Warren+816
5) Amy Klobuchar+1814
6) Andrew Yang+2973
All others at over +3000 or 30 to 1

It's between Bernie & Biden. If Bernie can beat Biden in Iowa & NH he has a good chance
otherwise it's a Biden runaway!
 
It's between Bernie & Biden. If Bernie can beat Biden in Iowa & NH he has a good chance
otherwise it's a Biden runaway!

I hope it's Bernie. He'll do just as well in the general as other progressives, like McGovern and Dukakis.
 
Buttigieg busts out to first place in Iowa - POLITICO



i am pleasantly surprised that mayor pete is leading in such a conservative, evangelical state. i had no idea a gay man would lead the pack in a state such as iowa

it would seem pete's political approach is more significant to the primary voters than his sexual orientation

kudos to iowa... or at least to 25% of its democratic voters

Any Democrat who doesn't vote for the gay mayor of the city with massive unemployment and crime is a homophobe. That is his campaign.
 
Any Democrat who doesn't vote for the gay mayor of the city with massive unemployment and crime is a homophobe. That is his campaign.

i hear you. like anyone who does not vote for an orange laughingstock with close russian ties is a communist
 
Last edited:
by the difficulty the iowa demo party is experiencing with the tabulations you would think this was the iowa calculus

Iowa Caucus Results Riddled With Errors and Inconsistencies - The New York Times

... “The caucus math work sheet is the official report on caucus night to the I.D.P., and the I.D.P. reports the results as delivered by the precinct chair,” she said. “This form must be signed by the caucus chair, the caucus secretary and representatives from each campaign in the room who attest to its accuracy. Under the rules of the delegate selection process, delegates are awarded based off the record of results as provided by each precinct caucus chair.”

... First, caucusgoers express their preference for a candidate upon arrival, and these votes are recorded in a “first alignment.” Then, candidates with limited support at a precinct, usually less than 15 percent, are deemed not viable; their supporters get a chance to realign to support a viable candidate. The preference at this point is recorded as well, and it’s called the final alignment. ...
 
excellent video of mayor pete's victory speech in iowa (link provided by Chomsky):

 
Well this is disturbing if true:

Shadow Inc: The Mysterious Clinton-Linked Company Counting Iowa's Caucus Votes | The National Interest



The Buttigieg campaign sent $42,000+ dollars in July of 2019 to the Shadow company charged with designing the app used to count and tabulate the data in the Iowa and Nevada caucuses/primaries. What the hell is going on down there?

Cheers.
Evilroddy.

Pssst Ahna Rao, former special assistant to the chief technology officer on Clinton’s campaign, and Krista Davis, a software engineer on Clinton’s campaign lost their jobs when the campaign ended so these two nefarious characters started their own for profit tech services start-up company last year as an offshoot of a nonprofit left of center ACRONYM which developed digital advertising and organizational support to left leaning campaigns and invests in companies like this. Here's another name for this group of clandestine tech savvy anti-Sanders operatives. Write down the name Tara McGowan CEO of ACRONYM, who was previously a digital producer for Barack Obama's 2012 campaign. Now these lowlife corporatists scum patented a phone app that was supposed to reduce the amount of manual labor needed to transcribe data received via telephone They sold the software rights of their app to the Iowa Democratic party to help documenting and counting the data from various precincts. We found this out from the campaign finance reports the IDP sent. They sold the software rights to Nevada Democratic party too from their campaign finance reports.

The Buttigieg campaign were C U S T O M E R S and they purchased the same service app to crunch internal data for their campaign and we learn that from, you guessed it the Buttigieg campaign finance reports. .

The damn app has clichés and problems that caused delays .


There is your conspiracy. A start-up company full of left wing techies no longer working on campaigns, sold an app they patented to several customers desperate to reduce manual labor staff hours.

Undoubtedly in 2 more months you will find Biden, and Mississippi Democratic Party sent them a checks for 100's of thousands too.


Just be glad that Sanders did not buy the app too.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom