• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

America's super rich: six things to know

Lafayette

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 13, 2015
Messages
9,594
Reaction score
2,072
Location
France
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
From the Guardian: America's super rich: six things to know

billionaires_lead.gif


Is America an oligarchy? That was the conclusion of a 2014 study by two prominent US political scientists, who argued that the influence of economic elites and big business far outstrips that of ordinary citizens. In their view, America is less a bastion of representative democracy than a nation trammeled by the desires of the hyper-wealthy.

Others have suggested that their vision is too bleak. But the outsize economic, social and political clout of the super-wealthy in America is beyond debate - and ripe for scrutiny. That’s why we’ve launched our newest series, Big Money.

They (the Replicants) were asking for it. Perhaps they think the summum purpose of life in America is to run after the numbers?

What numbers, say you? This number: 77%

billionaires_5.gif



Most Americans have had enough

The political clout of billionaires has soared since the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision, which determined that election-spending regulations restrict the right of corporations to free speech.

Yet 77% of the country believes there should be limits on how much individuals and organizations can spend on political campaigns. Most people are unhappy with the status quo, and do not think it’s fair that wealthier people have disproportionate political influence.

Yeah, that seems close to the unfortunate truth. We've had enough.

And November is the month when we get a chance to turn the page on this turgid story ...
 
Yep, Capitalism is pretty awful, and leads to an oligarchy.

Which alternative is better, and how would one build support for a major transition like that?
 
I question the use of "turgid". I also question instant oatmeal. It's not instant, and I'm not sure it's oatmeal.
 
Back
Top Bottom