• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hundreds of thousands are illegally registered to vote in texas

I couldn't find evidence of that number but, you really don't expect that to be published in the Mainstream? Even some on the left would be disgusted.

Why note? If there was actual evidence it would be in the mainstream, period. The main stream media is responsible for 99% of the true stories. Who do you think was the first source on the hillary clinton email private server story? MSM. The mainstream media is too large and segregated. They could never avoid an actual story like that if it were true or had good evidence.


Your post should have stopped at "I couldn't find evidence of that number".
 
Why note? If there was actual evidence it would be in the mainstream, period. The main stream media is responsible for 99% of the true stories. Who do you think was the first source on the hillary clinton email private server story? MSM. The mainstream media is too large and segregated. They could never avoid an actual story like that if it were true or had good evidence.


Your post should have stopped at "I couldn't find evidence of that number".

If you read #50. I believe the number is an average found in the study.
 
If you read #50. I believe the number is an average found in the study.

Feel free to show me any quote or documentation showing that to be the case. Other than that you're just throwing out a different study and saying you "suspect" that this number is based off of this other study you found.

If this number has any basis in reality it shouldn't be this hard to figure out where it came from.
 
Feel free to show me any quote or documentation showing that to be the case. Other than that you're just throwing out a different study and saying you "suspect" that this number is based off of this other study you found.

If this number has any basis in reality it shouldn't be this hard to figure out where it came from.

Table 3 is a low estimate [202,000] of registered non-citizens and table 4 is the high estimate.[417,000] for TX. average is actually 309,000.

From an LMU voter poll.
 
Last edited:
Table 3 is a low estimate [202,000] of registered non-citizens and table 4 is the high estimate.[417,000] for TX. average is actually 309,000.

From an LMU voter poll.

Is there anywhere you can point to where they say "we based our numbers off of this 10 year old study done by this anti-immigration think tank"?
 
Based on this liberal website, if you are so sure it is not a problem, why are you afraid of an investigation to see if it is really true? Why are you afraid of being proven right?

That is the argument, not dueling political parties. If the conservatives were benefiting from illegal votes, you guys would be all over this like white on rice.

The reps wanted the voter rolls for voter scrubbing operations.

Like Florida in 2000 when the sec of state scrubbed far more dem voters than bush won by.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...FjAAegQIBBAB&usg=AOvVaw2k_hCnBApRkavtGqAd7401
 
When you die you are supposed to be removed.

And when you aren't a felon you aren't supposed to he scrubbed from the voter rolls for being a felon.

Did you even read the article?
 
And when you aren't a felon you aren't supposed to he scrubbed from the voter rolls for being a felon.

Did you even read the article?

I did. It was garbage from 2000 and rehashes Gores loss to Bush. Gore, BTW tried to prevent late military ballots from overseas being counted. Your article left that out.
 
Is there anywhere you can point to where they say "we based our numbers off of this 10 year old study done by this anti-immigration think tank"?

Is the absolutely ANY study or figure that would satisfy you in any fashion. I'm thinking the answer is no.

Enough.
 
I did. It was garbage from 2000 and rehashes Gores loss to Bush. Gore, BTW tried to prevent late military ballots from overseas being counted. Your article left that out.

When did "two wrongs make a right" become conservative dogma?

There's no way you'd think this was OK if the parties were reversed. If white voters in republican ares were "caged" by a dem sec of state.

You lose all credibility when you do this.

How many investigations by your side that find little if any voter fraud do they have to do before you stop believing them?

How many times does your side have to be slapped down by the courts for their voter suppression activities do you have to see before you begin to suspect that its really just about suppressing dem voters?
 
Is the absolutely ANY study or figure that would satisfy you in any fashion. I'm thinking the answer is no.

Enough.

I'm sorry that you don't like it when people ask for actual facts or statistics.

Would you accept some number that a liberal group just spouted out if I told you "I think it's based off this study by another liberal group even though I have no evidence to back that up"?
 
I'm sorry that you don't like it when people ask for actual facts or statistics.

Would you accept some number that a liberal group just spouted out if I told you "I think it's based off this study by another liberal group even though I have no evidence to back that up"?

These are Conservative Texans...I trust them more than any Leftist group.
 
It could just be all those techies coming there to work that is turning Texas purple.

Those number justseem ridiculous.

Like the thousands that would have had to keep quiet all these years to fake the moon landing.

Y'all have cried wold too much on this issue.

Lots of investigations, not much to point at.

And the issue at hand isn't even about voter ID, right?

how hard is it to prove who you are, and where you live?

why is this such a hard concept for people to understand?

if we have a few that CANT prove who they are, lets make them the exception...not the rule

voter national id....FREE

and the ID must be presented to vote....

and if you want to vote absentee...fine

you still have to present ID at least every 2 years unless in military or in government service out of country

this isnt rocket science....
 
Back
Top Bottom