• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Polls sTrump will lose in 2020

Hey Shrub, what do you think of Shrubs post?

shrubnose said:
The only polls that count are the ones that the voters will be going to in November.
Click to expand...

Thanks Shrub, I'm glad you recognize the comical uselessness of Shrubs point in this thread.
 
shrubnose said:
s


No. These are polls that were taken after he cheated on hs wife-Twice

That will have some effect on some votes.

I doubt that this election will be as close as the last one.
Click to expand...

You're assuming these treasonous republi-confederates will even allow 2018 elections, let alone 2020 elections.
Who among us believes we'll ever have another orderly transition of power?

Once FOX talks #45 into firing Mueller with their guerrilla war smear campaign against Mueller, where will we be?
Once Bolton starts a 'hot' war with Iran, we all know where we'll be ...
 
jimbo said:
Sure, nobody had any idea Trump cheated on his wife prior to the election.
Click to expand...

Nobody knew of #45 paying off countless porn stars and threatening their lives and the lives of their children.
Not that these facts would have dissuaded 'evangelicals' from voting for #45 ...
 
Linc said:
You're assuming these treasonous republi-confederates will even allow 2018 elections, let alone 2020 elections.
Who among us believes we'll ever have another orderly transition of power?

Once FOX talks #45 into firing Mueller with their guerrilla war smear campaign against Mueller, where will we be?
Once Bolton starts a 'hot' war with Iran, we all know where we'll be
Click to expand...
...
Click to expand...


Not going to happen,wait and see
 
shrubnose said:
Tell me all about it in January,2021

:2razz:

I'm looking forward to your spin after the election.
Click to expand...

Jeez...why does this sound so familiar. Why oh why...

shrubnose said:
Whether you like him or not President Obama is the president of 321 million Americans and he'll have that job until another Democrat moves into the White House in 2017.

Wait and see.
Click to expand...

shrubnose said:
Come back and tell us all about it after Trump gets his butt handed to him in November.

I can hardly wait to read all of your 'woulda,coulda,shouldas.

:lol:
Click to expand...

shrubnose said:
Come back and tell us all about it after Trump gets his butt handed to him in the election.

You're betting on a dead horse.

:lol:
Click to expand...

shrubnose said:
Believe whatever you want to believe. Trump will lose the election because of his own stupid comments.

Wait and see.
Click to expand...

shrubnose said:
Trump and the Alt-Right will lose next month.

Wait and see.
Click to expand...

shrubnose said:
Trump may not lose by a landslide but he will lose.

Wait and see.
Click to expand...

shrubnose said:
All I'm saying is that Trump will lose.
Click to expand...

I'd keep going but I think we get the point.

When Shrub says "wait and see" or uses the little :lol: smiley while being all confident in making some opinion based claim like it's absolute fact....well, best to just ignore it. There's nothing actually honest or reasoned behind it.
 
Zyphlin said:
Jeez...why does this sound so familiar. Why oh why...















I'd keep going but I think we get the point.

When Shrub says "wait and see" or uses the little :lol: smiley while being all confident in making some opinion based claim like it's absolute fact....well, best to just ignore it. There's nothing actually honest or reasoned behind it
Click to expand...
.
Click to expand...
rump's will cost him some votes,wait and see.

2020 is a new election-it has nothing to do with 2016.
 
Last edited:
shrubnose said:
That's what I read on Google-polls show that all Democratic canddates beat Trump.

If anyone has proof otherwise,let's see it please.
Click to expand...

All those polls show is that Trump has about 40% support. The Democratic side goes up or down based on how well known the individual who's name gets plugged in.

This poll is simply "are you satisfied/dissatisfied" as it relates to Trump. To read more than that into it makes no sense.
 
shrubnose said:
rump's will cost him some votes,wait and see.
Click to expand...

They may cost him votes. We won't really know for sure until 2 years from now, at which point far more pressing things may be on voters minds and this may be a dead issue. We're way far out. As everyone should know by now, pronouncements from you are worthless. People "waiting and seeing" what you want them to wait and see would lead them to standing in place until they decompose. You make idiotic predictions in the fashion of pronounced facts, backed up by little to no logic, sound reasoning, or critical thought. It would be worth having an actual conversation or debate on the matter with someone addressing it in an actual realistic and adult fashion, but you have since before the last election been instead coming at it in this ignorant binary 0/1 where you just pronounce something, declare it so, demand people "wait and see", and then tuck tail over hte fact that we all waited and none of us saw.

2020 is a new election, and the events of today are likely to tell us no more or less about it than the events of the 2016 election...all of it is just data points, but not the deciding factor. Yes, 2016 is a different election than 2020...know what, the polls in november of 2020 that voters go into has "nothing to do" with the polls you saw on Google in 2018.

What sadly ISN'T new is your "wait and see" shtick.
 
shrubnose said:
Praxas said:
[/Qs wifsUOTE]


I wouldn't either if Trump hadn't cheated on his wife so muech.That will change some votes.
Click to expand...

I doubt it will affect many. They have made so many excuses for him that he truly could shoot someone and they wouldn't care because...well Hillary. Seriously, every hard core Trump supporter whenever you let them know his lies, cheating, corruption and unethical behavior their answer is, he's not Hillary like that somehow excuses everything.
Click to expand...
 
Praxas said:
I doubt it will affect many.
Click to expand...

Certainly not come election time.

First, there's 2 years for this to die down and other things to be far more on peoples mind.

Second, his die hard supporters are going to be his die hards no matter what.

Third, the "social" voters who may have an issue with him on a moral sense will still likely ultimately support him, because having someone who will support their social views in the law is more important to them than someone supporting their social views personally. They'd prefer to have BOTH, but if they can only get one they'd want the later. The reality is that Trump offers the latter and the Democratic candidate, whoever it may be, likely won't offer the former.

Fourth, did I mention its 2 years from now? If the economy is tanking, this issue will be a blip. If the economy is booming, this issue with be a blip. If we're engaged in a war, this issue will be a blip. If there is some kind of massive legislative overhaul that happens during the run up to the election, this will be a blip. If a bigger scandal of social issues happens, this will be a blip. There are so many factors that can occur in 2 years that are likely to override whatever significant impact this will have that talking about it in the scope of 2020 is foolish.

Talking about it in the scope of Trumps support in the NOW and how that affects his ability to get his agenda pushed forward, or the turnout and support of Republicans in the mid-term elections, is a relatively reasonable and rational thing to do with this information. But expecting it to allow one to gleam anything of use about 2020 or believing it to have any kind of noticeable impact then based on polls today is just foolishness.
 
Linc said:
The Russians are everywhere they want to be in this world and every thinking and honest man and woman knows it. We’re now left with the next Margaet Thatcher to be the Leader of the free world, and the Israelis better than any Nation know this ...
Click to expand...

tinfoilhat.jpg
 
Last edited:
ttwtt78640 said:
Does this mean it's finally Hillary's turn to be POTUS in 2020? She lost in the demorat primary in 2008, lost in the general election in 2016 (but won the popular vote - proving that she is super popular) so it must be her turn in 2020.
Click to expand...


Oh, I hope so! She should be completely bedridden and perhaps comatose by then.

But she'll still be touted as the smartest woman in the world.
 
shrubnose said:
That's what I read on Google-polls show that all Democratic canddates beat Trump.

If anyone has proof otherwise,let's see it please.
Click to expand...

I am definitely NOT a Trump supporter. But keep in mind: so many things can happen from now until 2020 that any predictions are going to be laughably unpredictable: economic, geopolitical, social unrest, new domestic and foreign issues, etc, etc....

I know we all want a crystal ball into the future. But even a prediction about next week is inaccurate, let alone 2020. Imagine if someone in 2023 would have predicted that Donald Trump would become president!:lamo
 
jeffchap said:
Oh, I hope so! She should be completely bedridden and perhaps comatose by then.

But she'll still be touted as the smartest woman in the world.
Click to expand...

That would certainly make her more appealing to voters than she currently is.
 
shrubnose said:
That's what I read on Google-polls show that all Democratic canddates beat Trump.

If anyone has proof otherwise,let's see it please.
Click to expand...

Remember when the 2016 presidential polls said the numbers were not on Trump's side, and no way he could win?
Yeah, me too. :lol:
 
shrubnose said:
That's what I read on Google-polls show that all Democratic canddates beat Trump.

If anyone has proof otherwise,let's see it please.
Click to expand...

Meh, before the election you were telling every Conservative on this site to get used to saying " Madame President ".
Didn't work out did it ?

That said, the Democrats have decided all of the sudden to remove their moderate veils and expose themselves as the radicals they've always been

Calling for the repeal of the second ammenent, single payer and open borders to pad their voting base with as many illegals as possible now identifies the Democratic party
 
Josie said:
Are these the same polls that said he would lose in a landslide in 2016?
Click to expand...

Odds can be beaten once or twice, but if you're betting against them you're not making a very smart choice.
 
Linc said:
2016 polls didn’t take into account the coordinated collusion between the GOP and Russia in our 2014 and 2016 elections.

Speaker Ryan and Dear Leader McConnell are treasonous cowards for not protecting Mueller and the United States of America ...
Click to expand...

Not to mention all those mean husbands out there forcing their wives to vote for Trump...
 
Zyphlin said:
Hey Shrub, what do you think of Shrubs post?



Thanks Shrub, I'm glad you recognize the comical uselessness of Shrubs point in this thread.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...


If Melania gets a divorce Trump will probably lose by a landslide.

In any case he won't be a 2- termer
 
If Melania were going to leave him, she'd have done it long before now. Do you think she just now learned about his infidelity on CNN?

After all, she's not Barack Obama.
 
Our President Trump will not be concerned about the polls. Matter of fact it will not be any "too close to call". It will be another landslide.
 
PTF said:
Our President Trump will not be concerned about the polls. Matter of fact it will not be any "too close to call". It will be another landslide.
Click to expand...

It wasn't a landslide the first time. 45 lost the popular vote and got fewer electoral votes than Obama did both times. The margin was so narrow that 100,000 votes spread out over four states going the other way would have had Clinton win.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom