• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Krugman - The Uses of Outrage

Lafayette

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 13, 2015
Messages
9,594
Reaction score
2,072
Location
France
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
From the NYT: Krugman - The Uses of Outrage

Excerpt:
Are you angry about the white nationalist takeover of the U.S. government? If so, you are definitely not alone. The first few weeks of the Trump administration have been marked by huge protests, furious crowds at congressional town halls, customer boycotts of businesses seen as Trump allies. And Democrats, responding to their base, have taken a hard line against cooperation with the new regime.

But is all this wise? Inevitably, one hears some voices urging everyone to cool it — to wait and see, to try to be constructive, to reach out to Trump supporters, to seek ground for compromise. Just say no.

Outrage at what’s happening to America isn’t just justified, it’s essential. In fact, it may be our last chance of saving democracy.

Even in narrowly partisan terms, Democrats would be well advised to keep listening to their base. Anyone who claims that being seen as obstructionist will hurt them politically must have slept through the past couple of decades. Were Democrats rewarded for cooperating with George W. Bush? Were Republicans punished for their scorched-earth opposition to President Obama? Get real.

It’s true that white working-class voters, the core of Donald Trump’s support, don’t seem to care about the torrent of scandal: They won’t turn on him until they realize that his promises to bring back jobs and protect their health care were lies. But remember, he lost the popular vote, and would have lost the Electoral College if a significant number of college-educated voters hadn’t been misled by the media and the F.B.I. into believing that Hillary Clinton was somehow even less ethical than he was. Those voters are now having a rude awakening, and need to be kept awake.

And that awakening must continue. He is hoping dearly to take the credit for an economic recovery that actually began to years ago in 2014. (See the Bureau of Labor Statistics infographic here.)
 
From the NYT: Krugman - The Uses of Outrage

Excerpt:

And that awakening must continue. He is hoping dearly to take the credit for an economic recovery that actually began to years ago in 2014. (See the Bureau of Labor Statistics infographic here.)

That Krugman would be unhappy and find a gripe is clear. He has an audience that expects him to do that. But the outrage is unjustified and silly. almost 50 percent of the population did not care enough to vote against Trump and it is singularly disingenuous to complain. If the Democrats did not work hard enough to interest their voters, then they are to blame themselves. It is my fault, Krugman's and yours, if you are American, that Trump is President. Squawking around now ist a helpless demonstration of impotent attempt at disguising ones own insufficiency.
 
From the NYT: Krugman - The Uses of Outrage

Excerpt:

And that awakening must continue. He is hoping dearly to take the credit for an economic recovery that actually began to years ago in 2014. (See the Bureau of Labor Statistics infographic here.)

:roll:

Yes, please keep up the petulant children act. I'm sure it'll garner a lot of votes come midterms. ;)
 
From the NYT: Krugman - The Uses of Outrage

Excerpt:

And that awakening must continue. He is hoping dearly to take the credit for an economic recovery that actually began to years ago in 2014. (See the Bureau of Labor Statistics infographic here.)

Wow!

Are you actually unaware that Krugman is an agenda driven mouthpiece for the Democrat party.

This is the same guy that predicted the collapse of the economy due to Trump.

Paul Krugman: Trump will bring global recession - POLITICO
 
Being a dick generally doesn't lead to success.
 
Its bad enough that Krugman spouts Keynesian nonsense and takes credit whenever something finally good happens in the economy (like when a broken clock is right twice a day kind), but he is also an unabashed partisan who is actually advocating protests because he didnt like the way the election turned out. He needs to get canned.
 
It seems Krugman is pulling the race card. Who cares about white working class voters, as long as everyone else gets what they want, right? Who cares if rural W VA has work?
Why bring back jobs, look out for America first, why seek prosperity when it is so much easier to send jobs away, cater to illegals at the cost of American citizens? Why not stuff the poor into ghettos and throw some borrowed money their way to keep them pacified until the next election looms so we can make empty promises once again?
Trump may be a clown, but it seems he is putting American citizen first. So please, while you argue for compassion, please don't forget the people next to you, including the white or black WORKING class. Compassion is great, look around. Everyone needs some.
 
From the NYT: Krugman - The Uses of Outrage

Excerpt:

And that awakening must continue. He is hoping dearly to take the credit for an economic recovery that actually began to years ago in 2014. (See the Bureau of Labor Statistics infographic here.)

Because the WH isn't occupied by Negros any longer, suddenly is a White Nationalist takeover? What a bunch of over-blown minutia.

I know most of the Left can't remember back past 8 years but, they gone.
 
That Krugman would be unhappy and find a gripe is clear. He has an audience that expects him to do that. But the outrage is unjustified and silly. almost 50 percent of the population did not care enough to vote against Trump and it is singularly disingenuous to complain. If the Democrats did not work hard enough to interest their voters, then they are to blame themselves. It is my fault, Krugman's and yours, if you are American, that Trump is President. Squawking around now ist a helpless demonstration of impotent attempt at disguising ones own insufficiency.

One thing good that comes out of this will be new and better ways to ignore or torment the next Leftist POTUS. ;)
 
...
And that awakening must continue. He is hoping dearly to take the credit for an economic recovery that actually began to years ago in 2014. (See the Bureau of Labor Statistics infographic here.)

Krugman aside (he's been a loon for many years and it's to be expected), as to your own comment and accompanying link/graphic only one reaction is possible ... HUH?
 
Krugman aside (he's been a loon for many years and it's to be expected), as to your own comment and accompanying link/graphic only one reaction is possible ... HUH?

It is quite a loss to economics. Krugman was really very good till deciding that ideology was more important than economic realities and started using his economic renown as a prop for populist editorials.
 
That Krugman would be unhappy and find a gripe is clear. He has an audience that expects him to do that. But the outrage is unjustified and silly. almost 50 percent of the population did not care enough to vote against Trump and it is singularly disingenuous to complain. If the Democrats did not work hard enough to interest their voters, then they are to blame themselves. It is my fault, Krugman's and yours, if you are American, that Trump is President. Squawking around now ist a helpless demonstration of impotent attempt at disguising ones own insufficiency.

krugmans faux outrage is just that.
he wasn't outraged when the DNC was fixing an election.

He wasn't outraged when Clinton was sending hundreds of classified emails through an unsecure server.

his outrage is nothing more than a fallacy that only utra-liberals will care about.
 
It is quite a loss to economics. Krugman was really very good till deciding that ideology was more important than economic realities and started using his economic renown as a prop for populist editorials.

the issue with his economics is that he went from probably a neutral stance to towing the liberal economic line. so he even lost in that regard as well.
 
Its bad enough that Krugman spouts Keynesian nonsense and takes credit whenever something finally good happens in the economy (like when a broken clock is right twice a day kind), but he is also an unabashed partisan who is actually advocating protests because he didnt like the way the election turned out. He needs to get canned.

:agree: Wasn't Krugman the "Democrat globalist" who suggested minting trillion dollar platinum coins to enable us to keep "spending our way to prosperity?" He was apparently wrong, since we now have a $20 trillion dollar debt in addition to 45 million people on food stamps and millions more on other government assistance just to survive!

"What's wrong with this picture" is the reason that I suggest that he "had his day in the sun" these past eight years, and since his message just wasn't resonating with the public any longer, they voted for change and won the election, much to his obvious disgust! Too bad for him, but change does occur in spite of his reluctance to accept it, and whining about it only makes him look bad without changing a thing.... :shock:
 
From the NYT: Krugman - The Uses of Outrage

Excerpt:

And that awakening must continue. He is hoping dearly to take the credit for an economic recovery that actually began to years ago in 2014. (See the Bureau of Labor Statistics infographic here.)

Sure, "Republicans" weren't hurt by the vitriol shown to Obama. Sure, "Democrats" won't be hurt by going scorched-earth on anything even tangentially related to Trump. You know who is hurt by all this? The country and its people as a whole.
 
GUNS OR BUTTER?

You know who is hurt by all this? The country and its people as a whole.

The parties react to how the "campaign specialists" analyse and devise a "strategy". Hillary did it, and Donald Dork probably did the same. Then both spent together (according to CBS News) $6.8B!

How many schools could we have built for $6.8B!

Well, boyz-'n-girlz, it aint more schools that you will be getting for your money. Its more guns, not more butter.

For a ridiculous outcome of a "crooked" presidency (the Dork has no legitimacy, he lost the popular-vote), we, the sheeple, are getting increased DoD spending that will bring us NADA in the bread-basket. DoD spending needs no expansion of budget whatsoever because there is no justification for it.

Where's the war? Unless Donald Dork wants to commit our boyz-blood to eradicating ISIS in Syria, which is happening well-enough already by means of Turkish and Kurdish forces.

So, at home, the nation gets nothing, zip, rien, nichts, niente, tipota.

The DoD-spending already eats 54% of the entire Discretionary Budget

discretionary_spending_pie,_2015_enacted.png
 
Last edited:
It is quite a loss to economics. Krugman was really very good till deciding that ideology was more important than economic realities and started using his economic renown as a prop for populist editorials.

You call it "ideology", and I call it just "good sense".

De gustibus non disputandum est ...
 
Because the WH isn't occupied by Negros any longer, suddenly is a White Nationalist takeover? What a bunch of over-blown minutia.

I know most of the Left can't remember back past 8 years but, they gone.

Blah, blah, blah - getta brain ...
 
:roll:

Yes, please keep up the petulant children act. I'm sure it'll garner a lot of votes come midterms. ;)

Petulant? Wow.

It is just discourse at the present intellectual level of this forum ...
 
... almost 50 percent of the population did not care enough to vote against Trump and it is singularly disingenuous to complain.

The average stay-away from national elections in the US is around 48%. We have one of the lowest voter-rates of any developed country.

If the Democrats did not work hard enough to interest their voters, then they are to blame themselves.

It's "the system". Many people, especially on this forum, believe that the Electoral College (as it stands) needs no remedy. It is, rather, a huge-injustice to what some people call "democracy".

It is my fault, Krugman's and yours, if you are American, that Trump is President. Squawking around now is a helpless ... demonstration of impotent attempt at disguising ones own insufficiency.

You forget that this is a "debate forum" and not a "message board". Though the one-liner messages here show just the opposite.

Besides, I'm taking the flak, not you ...
 
You call it "ideology", and I call it just "good sense".

De gustibus non disputandum est ...

That the way ideologues usually say they consider their ideology. ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom