• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ex-British ambassador: Russia did NOT provide Clinton emails

But I can't help but notice you didnt' answer the question. Have you been a Globalist the entire time? Or is this a recent evolution that occurred as soon as it became politically convenient to do so? I'd like to hear more about how this new standard in which foreigners rightfully have as much influence over our elections as US citizens.
Sorry I haven't responded in a timely manner to some of your posts. The holiday season has prevented me from being on DP for one reason or other. I'm still passionate about this issue, though.

When was the 2016 presidential election affected by foreign entities? Three months before the election during the Wikileaks disseminations? Possibly with the edicts of the Pope or the UN which happened much sooner in that election cycle? Sidenote: not to mention the constant barrage of information, all with their special spin, from the MSM?

All of the above influenced the 2016 election...quite possible may have contributed to the hardliner voting for some candidates at an early time in the election.

Still not sure why you want to single out Russia for its alleged influence when there's been all this other foreign influence of the 2016 election that we're aware of.
 
Last edited:
But I can't help but notice you didnt' answer the question. Have you been a Globalist the entire time?...
Do you consider attempting to put refugees of the Syrian War in camps, for example, as an example of Trump's (or my) globalism? We are attempting to stem the tide of 'under-vetted' refugees coming to the US. Do you think Trump (or I) possibly considering the enlistment of Russia, Iran, et cetera, as proxies in the fight to destroy ISIS as globalism? We really have the American people's safety and the integrity of American borders at heart with this goal of destroying ISIS.
 
Last edited:
John Podesta just writes his e-mail address and its password on one of those novelty-sized post-it notes and sticks it up in the lobby at the White House.

It's not like this story disregards the fact that whoever leaked the emails was a hacker or a team of hackers. And how many people with personal relationships to White House staff and close ties to the DNC are sophisticated hackers? What a garbage story. I think Putin is putting it out there to see how many right wing blogs and websites will continue to trust him and his propaganda more than the real media.
 
Sorry I haven't responded in a timely manner to some of your posts. The holiday season has prevented me from being on DP for one reason or other

No worries - I'm in the same bucket.

When was the 2016 presidential election affected by foreign entities? Three months before the election during the Wikileaks disseminations? Possibly with the edicts of the Pope or the UN which happened much sooner in that election cycle? Sidenote: not to mention the constant barrage of information, all with their special spin, from the MSM?

All of the above influenced the 2016 election...quite possible may have contributed to the hardliner voting for some candidates at an early time in the election.

Still not sure why you want to single out Russia for its alleged influence when there's been all this other foreign influence of the 2016 election that we're aware of.

Because Russia - as far as I am aware, is the only actor to have run a clandestine influence operation built around a series of cyber intrusions, in order to influence domestic US politics. None of the other factors you are trying (and failing) to lump in there with Russia are.


To put it in perspective: the logic you are trying to bring to bear here is comparable to Obama's argument that, because more people die in bathtubs, Islamic Fundamentalist Terrorism isn't a big deal and people are silly for thinking it is. The bathtubs aren't trying to kill us.

In this case, the Brexit vote wasn't a clandestine operation designed to launch a series of hacks against US entities as part of a collection program feeding an information operation campaign. It was about Brexit. The UN wasn't a clandestine operation designed to launch a series of hacks against US entities as part of a collection program feeding an information operation campaign. It was about condemning the Israel for all the things that it's members are actually guilty of. The Pope wasn't a clandestine operation designed to launch a series of hacks against US entities as part of a collection program feeding an information operation campaign. He was a Spiritual leader for Catholics. The MSM wasn't a clandestine operation designed to launch a series of hacks against US entities as part of a collection program feeding an information operation campaign. It was a biased MSM, the same as we've always had.

Critically, however, the MSM is also American citizens. American Citizens are absolutely within their rights and Right to attempt to convince their fellow American's of their views. Vladimir Putin trying to influence the American populace to make them more compliant with his will, not so much.

cpwill said:
But I can't help but notice you didnt' answer the question. Have you been a Globalist the entire time?...
Do you consider attempting to put refugees of the Syrian War in camps, for example, as an example of Trump's (or my) globalism?

Oh. Look. A Non-Sequitor. What do Syrian refugees have to do with your decision to adopt Globalism and defend the claim that foreigners should have just as much if not more influence over our domestic politics than American citizens?

We really have the American people's safety and the integrity of American borders at heart

Evidently not, since you are willing to enlist foreign powers on your behalf against domestic political opponents. So much for Nationalism.
 
Give an example of an indication I may aspire to globalism.

You think that foreign entities should have as much or more political influence over our domestic politics as American Citizens. You are the Republican version of the Progressive who wishes that the UN had the ability to enforce their Climate Control nonsense on us - you are fine with surrendering sovereignty, so long as it helps you achieve domestic political goals.

You seem to be OK with influences in American elections like Brexit. Like the edicts of Pope Gregory.

Addressed above. Lecture us some more about how we shouldn't worry about Radical Jihadists Because Bathtubs.

Like Britain pre-Perle Harbor. Like the UN. You realize these are all organizations outside of the US that influence or attempt to influence American elections. Why is your definition of foreign influence in American elections so narrow? Because it serves your anti-Trump purpose, maybe?

I realize that this may be tough to understand in 2016. But this incident is not about Trump. I don't care if it helped him or hurt him (though, frankly, I think that the desperate attempts to cling to it as a deus ex machina by the Democrats are funny). It is about Russia.

How do you explain tactics of our CIA that attempts to influence other countries' elections? That it's OK as long as no blame can be placed on the CIA?

We do that to countries whose regimes we are attempting to overthrow. IOW, when we wish to attach a nations' political source of sovereignty, we do to them what you are excusing another nation doing to your own country, so long as it benefits you.

So much for Trupmkin claims to be Nationalists, or interested in Making America Great Again. It really is just a cult of personality. Anything to defend the leader, even from imaginary attacks :roll:
 
John Podesta just writes his e-mail address and its password on one of those novelty-sized post-it notes and sticks it up in the lobby at the White House.

It's not like this story disregards the fact that whoever leaked the emails was a hacker or a team of hackers. And how many people with personal relationships to White House staff and close ties to the DNC are sophisticated hackers? What a garbage story. I think Putin is putting it out there to see how many right wing blogs and websites will continue to trust him and his propaganda more than the real media.

In a way that's a measure of Putin's success, that Americans of a certain presuasion trust dubious facebook sources before their own.
 
Back
Top Bottom