• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Jill Stein finds voter fraud...

ksu_aviator

ksu_aviator

Democrats are the fascists
DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 7, 2010
Messages
7,676
Reaction score
2,850
Location
Your Head
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
...that likely favored Hillary.

Michigan recount reveals error, but not the one Jill Stein wanted | New York Post

The Detroit News found voting scanning machines at 248 of the city’s 662 precincts — 37 percent — tabulated more ballots than the number of actual voters counted in the poll books.

“There’s always going to be small problems to some degree, but we didn’t expect the degree of problem we saw in Detroit. This isn’t normal,” Krista Haroutunian, chairwoman of the Wayne County Board of Canvassers, told the paper.
Click to expand...



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I think we need an investigator to spend millions of dollars to investigate this to make sure that we, the voters, can still have confidence in the voting system, you know, to find mistakes to make voting better.....

:lamo


I couldn't get through it without laughing... sorry.
 
Ockham said:
I think we need an investigator to spend millions of dollars to investigate this to make sure that we, the voters, can still have confidence in the voting system, you know, to find mistakes to make voting better.....

:lamo


I couldn't get through it without laughing... sorry.
Click to expand...

Greetings, Ockham. :2wave:

You are so ornery! :thumbs: I'm still laughing.... :lamo
 
Ockham said:
I think we need an investigator to spend millions of dollars to investigate this to make sure that we, the voters, can still have confidence in the voting system, you know, to find mistakes to make voting better.....

:lamo


I couldn't get through it without laughing... sorry.
Click to expand...

I think having each poll precinct worker spending a month in prison (washing and carefully counting underwear?) for each manufacured vote should do the trick. 307 minus 50 times 30 days is a long time to think about the wonders of an election rigging scam.
 
ttwtt78640 said:
That is not voter fraud - it may well be precinct personnel ****ing up or manufacturing fake vote totals but so far no fraudulent ballots seem to have been found.
Click to expand...

This is probably the most reasonable explanation: sporadic displays of consequential incompetence.
 
Fiddytree said:
She's a greenie. She's just high as ****.
Click to expand...

I live in Colorado at 8500 feet. Being high isn't an excuse, even at 8500 feet. Some of the smartest **** I have ever said was while I was high. I just couldn't remember what it was that I said.
 
NonoBadDog said:
I live in Colorado at 8500 feet. Being high isn't an excuse, even at 8500 feet. Some of the smartest **** I have ever said was while I was high. I just couldn't remember what it was that I said.
Click to expand...

Either that or it was also the dumbest thing you've ever said, but weed will convince you otherwise. ;)
 
ttwtt78640 said:
That is not voter fraud - it may well be precinct personnel ****ing up or manufacturing fake vote totals but so far no fraudulent ballots seem to have been found.
Click to expand...

No...the report is that after the recount it was discovered that the actual number of ballots cast is greater than the number of registered voters in the district. That would mean a 100% participation plus same day registrations and votes for it to be legal. That is possible here and there. But, for it to happen in 200+ districts in one city? That is just so unlikely that it is not plausible. The chance of voter fraud is 99%.
 
ksu_aviator said:
No...the report is that after the recount it was discovered that the actual number of ballots cast is greater than the number of registered voters in the district. That would mean a 100% participation plus same day registrations and votes for it to be legal. That is possible here and there. But, for it to happen in 200+ districts in one city? That is just so unlikely that it is not plausible. The chance of voter fraud is 99%.
Click to expand...

We can be assured that these same (demorat?) city districts will investigate themselves and find no criminal acts, just the need for more resources (equipment, personnel and training). It will likely be declared to be the result of a "system failure" with absolutely nobody held accountable. After all, the demorats insist that there is no such thing as widespread voter fraud so why even entertain that possibility. ;)
 
Well, that's 248 out of the 2,500,000 lead...
 
NonoBadDog said:
Some of the smartest **** I have ever said was while I was high. I just couldn't remember what it was that I said.
Click to expand...

So how'd you know you said it?
 
California recount proves hard right is the direction of this country. America will vote trump in for four terms.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom