My lord...right wing media has done a wonderful job convincing people like you of lies....for the last time, there is virtually no voter fraud, none.
You lie about voter fraud. Maybe you just don't know any better. Try reading this:
House Report 105-416 - DISMISSING THE ELECTION CONTEST AGAINST LORETTA SANCHEZ
The Committee detailed egregious violations of the state
election laws to support its conclusion including: (1) stolen
ballots; (2) improperly constituted board of election
inspectors; (3) persons voting multiple times; (4)
electioneering too close to the polls; (5) unsworn persons
handling ballots; (6) intimidation of poll workers; (7)
drunkenness by the head of the board of election inspectors;
(8) inspectors with knowledge of stolen ballots failing to
report such illegalities; and (9) torn, erased, and mutilated
ballots. ...
Information gathered at this Field Hearing indicated that
the Immigration and Naturalization Service was unwilling to
assist either the Contestant or the Secretary of State Bill
Jones in determining if non-citizens voted in the 1996
election.\79\ ...
The Majority analysis began with a shotgun approach,
sweeping into its ``suspect voter'' category over 500,000
registrant name matches. The Majority attempted to refine . ...
number by including only 46th Congressional District registrant
names to be matched with INS files. This resulted in 136,000
matching names, which is more ``suspect voters'' than actual
voters in the 46th Congressional election in 1996. This again
suggests that the foundation upon which the Majority analysis
proceeded was fundamentally flawed. ...
9th--The California Secretary of State announced that an
INS analysis of 1,100 persons enrolled in Hermandad citizenship
classes had discovered 490 documented non-citizens who
registered to vote in CA 46. Of these, 303 actually voted
illegally in CA 46, and 69 individuals had no record in INS
files. ...
dismissal of the cases of Hendon v. Clarke in 1983 and Hansen
v. Stallings in 1985 where persuasive allegations of irregular
vote countings were plead properly.29 ...
Similarly, in Farr v. McLane 98 the Committee
addressed an election contest containing a wide range of
violations including: (1) unregistered voters casting ballots;
(2) names appearing on the voted tape for persons who had not
cast ballots; (3) individuals voting who were minors or had not
paid the mandatory poll tax; and (4) the placement of
fraudulent ballots in the ballot box. The Committee found that
for the majority of the 1,006 illegal votes, there was no way
to determine for which candidate the votes were cast. It
determined that in the districts in which there was conclusive
evidence of fraud on the part of the election officials,
precedent justified rejecting the entire vote of these
precincts. The Committee emphasized that in these precincts not
only had persons been permitted to vote who had not registered,
but there was evidence of other fraud and collusion on the part
of election officials. ...
The Committee used proportional deduction to apportion the
illegal votes of non-citizens in Bailey v. Walters,
95 including aliens who had never been naturalized
and would not disclose for whom they voted. The Committee
subtracted the votes of non-citizen voters who testified for
whom they voted from the appropriate candidates' totals. For
non-citizen voters who exercised their Constitutional right not
to disclose their vote, the Committee used proportional
deduction to attribute their votes. ...
This represents the first time that the House has moved
forward with a hearing on the merits of an election contest
under the FCEA. This decision was based on the substantial and
credible allegations of fraud contained in Mr. Dornan's Notice.
These allegations were supported by independent investigations
being conducted by the California Secretary of State and the
Orange County District Attorney. ...
