• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A fast way to understand political parties

Robertinfremont

Photo of me taken in the Army 1963
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 3, 2018
Messages
30,122
Reaction score
3,395
Location
Meridian, Idaho
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
I can go into enormous reasoning yet my capping argument would be, How to explain politics among both republicans vs Democrats in easy terms.

Democrats live a life of no orgasams, where as Republicans enjoy massive and frequent orgasms.

This not sexually, but politically.

I am not fighting with Democrats. I realize they do not grasp what I am saying.

So to begin,

My major fight is against those who can't tolerate the human condition known as Freedom for all of us.

I tolerate them since I am actually the kind of Libearal well known by the Founders.

YES, that kind of Libearal.

What kind was it? Well it fought to have a rather tiny Fedearal goverment A good kind of orgasim.

Democrats desire to tax us to death.

We get told "You did not create that."

You must pay higher taxes.

You better follow Democrats since they have a well planned way to rule you.

Use petroleum products? How the hell dare you, Republicans.

We know far better than you know what is better. Do not try to hold on to freedom since we do not tolerate your freedom.

"We are your rulers. So stop this crap you need orgasms. we will tax you further for having them."



So vote for us. You do not deserve freedom.
 
I can go into enormous reasoning yet my capping argument would be, How to explain politics among both republicans vs Democrats in easy terms.

Democrats live a life of no orgasams, where as Republicans enjoy massive and frequent orgasms.

This not sexually, but politically.

I am not fighting with Democrats. I realize they do not grasp what I am saying.

So to begin,

My major fight is against those who can't tolerate the human condition known as Freedom for all of us.

I tolerate them since I am actually the kind of Libearal well known by the Founders.

YES, that kind of Libearal.

What kind was it? Well it fought to have a rather tiny Fedearal goverment A good kind of orgasim.

Democrats desire to tax us to death.

We get told "You did not create that."

You must pay higher taxes.

You better follow Democrats since they have a well planned way to rule you.

Use petroleum products? How the hell dare you, Republicans.

We know far better than you know what is better. Do not try to hold on to freedom since we do not tolerate your freedom.

"We are your rulers. So stop this crap you need orgasms. we will tax you further for having them."



So vote for us. You do not deserve freedom.

So how do you like paying for your local school Dist. $$$$levy$$$$ Fellow Idahoan? We're a Republican controlled state right?(LOL)
 
I can go into enormous reasoning yet my capping argument would be, How to explain politics among both republicans vs Democrats in easy terms.

I don't think they're are any political differences between Republicans and Democrats.
With the exception of Donald Trump who believes he can do what he likes as president.

Trump believes in freedom, for himself

Democrats desire to tax us to death.

What is your criteria for "taxed to death" ?
If you mean the rich paying more than yes

Republicans also have the same "tax you to death" policy, with the difference being the rich pay far less.

How about we slash 75% of the defense budget, that would negate the need to tax you to death as much ?
 
I don't think they're are any political differences between Republicans and Democrats.
With the exception of Donald Trump who believes he can do what he likes as president.

Trump believes in freedom, for himself



What is your criteria for "taxed to death" ?
If you mean the rich paying more than yes

Republicans also have the same "tax you to death" policy, with the difference being the rich pay far less.

How about we slash 75% of the defense budget, that would negate the need to tax you to death as much ?

So you would punish men like Clinton and Obama due to them making staggering high incomes?

Trump is advocating for all men to be free. Sure if it is up to him, men of high incomes would be taxes the way the super rich G. Washjingon taxed the citizens of that era.

Problem for Democrats are taxes are their excuse for themselves running away from taxes to ensure the rich support the country both in millions being hired vs Democrats among those who tax them and enjoy the fruit of them escaping taxes with no duty for them to pay incomes to not only the Feds, but to the working man.
The working man gets the best deal by not hiring others and handing off taxes they should pay to the Feds.

When you slash the Defense, keep in mind that it is normally the poor and middle class who get laid off.
 
So you would punish men like Clinton and Obama due to them making staggering high incomes?

If you see taxation as a "punishment"...which is a weird opinion to draw


Trump is advocating for all men to be free....

Yes, particularly himself after he ceases to become president and those who broke the law getting him elected:

All 4 federal prosecutors quit Stone case after DOJ overrules prosecutors on sentencing request - CNNPolitics



Sure if it is up to him, men of high incomes would be taxes the way the super rich G. Washjingon taxed the citizens of that era.

Again in English


Problem for Democrats are taxes are their excuse for themselves running away from taxes to ensure the rich support the country both in millions being hired vs Democrats among those who tax them and enjoy the fruit of them escaping taxes with no duty for them to pay incomes to not only the Feds, but to the working man.

What ?


The working man gets the best deal by not hiring others and handing off taxes they should pay to the Feds.


What ?
Is English not your first language ?


When you slash the Defense, keep in mind that it is normally the poor and middle class who get laid off.


So you think the DoD exists to employ people ?

$ Multi-billion contracts to develop things like the much maligned F-35 ?
Who gets laid off again ?
 
If you see taxation as a "punishment"...which is a weird opinion to draw




Yes, particularly himself after he ceases to become president and those who broke the law getting him elected:

All 4 federal prosecutors quit Stone case after DOJ overrules prosecutors on sentencing request - CNNPolitics

So you think the DoD exists to employ people ?

$ Multi-billion contracts to develop things like the much maligned F-35 ?
Who gets laid off again ?

Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Lockheed_Martin_F-22_Raptor
The Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor is a single-seat, twin-engine, all-weather stealth tactical fighter aircraft developed for the United States Air Force (USAF). The result of the USAF's Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) program, the aircraft ... After President Obama threatened to veto further production, the Senate voted in July ...

So who favored the F-35 over the superior F-22?

Democrats definitely treat high taxes on the rich as punishing them.

You among other democrats definitely despise Trump. We call such Democrats the resistance and the malcontents since they never voted for the man. TDS clearly is a disabled mind.
 
Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor...

At least that's regarded as a good airplane
Obscenely expensive though
Where do all these billions go to ? Into which poor working class people's checking a/c ?


So who favored the F-35 over the superior F-22?

Believe it or not, the F-35 was supposed to be cheaper, also there is no naval version of the F-22


Democrats definitely treat high taxes on the rich as punishing them.

Definitely ?

Do you have a source for that claim.


You among other democrats definitely despise Trump.

As anyone who is knowledgeable an morally decent at all would


We call such Democrats the resistance and the malcontents since they never voted for the man. TDS clearly is a disabled mind.


Diseased mind out of control.

The man is deranged, he can spend an entire day putting out over 150 Tweets.

He is a clown and he's dangerous.
He absolutely thinks he can do anything, and like Nixon, thinks he's above the law.
 
At least that's regarded as a good airplane
Obscenely expensive though
Where do all these billions go to ? Into which poor working class people's checking a/c ?




Believe it or not, the F-35 was supposed to be cheaper, also there is no naval version of the F-22




Definitely ?

Do you have a source for that claim.




As anyone who is knowledgeable an morally decent at all would





Diseased mind out of control.

The man is deranged, he can spend an entire day putting out over 150 Tweets.

He is a clown and he's dangerous.
He absolutely thinks he can do anything, and like Nixon, thinks he's above the law.

The F-22 is worth every dollar spent on it. I happen to be a pilot who understands the cost of the B-52 and was never designed to Take off nor land on Aircraft Carriers.

And they navy has some magnificent airplanes that have long time successful take off and landings that were designed for that years ago.

Frankly the poor are not making airplanes They need skills and training to do it. when they graduate, then they are no longer poor.

Oh god yes I can provide sources for any of my claims.

What is so amusing are the Democrats unwilling to back up their fake claims.

FDR was not hired for being moral. JFK and Johnson too lacked the morals you may proclaim to want.

IT is a very rare Democrat who truly is moral.

Tweeting is the way a president now gives his views since he fights with the media, ran by Democrats who themselves run the media and lies daily about Trump.

Anything else you need me do for you?
 
The F-22 is worth every dollar spent on it. I happen to be a pilot who understands the cost of the B-52 and was never designed to Take off nor land on Aircraft Carriers.

And they navy has some magnificent airplanes that have long time successful take off and landings that were designed for that years ago.

Frankly the poor are not making airplanes They need skills and training to do it. when they graduate, then they are no longer poor.

Oh god yes I can provide sources for any of my claims.

What is so amusing are the Democrats unwilling to back up their fake claims.

FDR was not hired for being moral. JFK and Johnson too lacked the morals you may proclaim to want.

IT is a very rare Democrat who truly is moral.

Tweeting is the way a president now gives his views since he fights with the media, ran by Democrats who themselves run the media and lies daily about Trump.

Anything else you need me do for you?

The F-22 is good but not THAT good. It's RADAR negates some of its stealth which also restricts the weapons it carries. The Euro Typhoon isn't far behind for much less cost and the helmet mounted display is an advantage.
I'm not sure why you're talking about the B-52 landing on aircraft carriers !

The US Navy's aircraft are ageing and being replaced by F-35 which, shall we say, has a few criticisms. A lot actually

What "fake" claims are the Democrats unable to back up ?


FDR and JFK were probably America's greatest ever presidents. Now we have this pompous clown that's destroying American Democracy bit by bit - foreign policy is already a train wreck. Trump is a total idiot and a new president will find it hard to repair the damage Trump has done America's reputation in the world.

No, Tweeting is the way Trump gives his views. Many of them showing how disconnected and deranged he is.
Even today the Attorney General say Trumps tweets are making his job impossible (I guess you missed that story)


Attorney General Says Tweets Make It Impossible for Him to Do His Job - WSJ


Comments ?
 
I can go into enormous reasoning yet my capping argument would be, How to explain politics among both republicans vs Democrats in easy terms.

Democrats live a life of no orgasams, where as Republicans enjoy massive and frequent orgasms.

This not sexually, but politically.

I am not fighting with Democrats. I realize they do not grasp what I am saying.

So to begin,

My major fight is against those who can't tolerate the human condition known as Freedom for all of us.

I tolerate them since I am actually the kind of Libearal well known by the Founders.

YES, that kind of Libearal.

What kind was it? Well it fought to have a rather tiny Fedearal goverment A good kind of orgasim.

Democrats desire to tax us to death.

We get told "You did not create that."

You must pay higher taxes.

You better follow Democrats since they have a well planned way to rule you.

Use petroleum products? How the hell dare you, Republicans.

We know far better than you know what is better. Do not try to hold on to freedom since we do not tolerate your freedom.

"We are your rulers. So stop this crap you need orgasms. we will tax you further for having them."



So vote for us. You do not deserve freedom.

:roll:

Democrats view government through a "united, forward-thinking" prism, that "we're all in this together" and that "change isn't a bad thing; it's how the nation evolves over time embracing new ideas".

Republicans are "protectionist" who believe that "old tried and true ideals (principles) are worth preserving" firmly believing that some things should remain "static, unchanged", that the individual is more important than the collective. Wash, rinse, repeat is the basis behind "federalism = if it ain't broke, don't fix it."

I can see the pros behind the ideology of both parties. I embrace alittle of both; it's why I consider myself to be a Moderate despite being a registered Democrat. For me, I take "WE, THE PEOPLE" seriously in that our collective rights can only be preserved if WE recognize what they are and are willing to fight to maintain them even if from time to time we may have to be an island unto ourselves.
 
:roll:

Democrats view government through a "united, forward-thinking" prism, that "we're all in this together" and that "change isn't a bad thing; it's how the nation evolves over time embracing new ideas".

Republicans are "protectionist" who believe that "old tried and true ideals (principles) are worth preserving" firmly believing that some things should remain "static, unchanged", that the individual is more important than the collective. Wash, rinse, repeat is the basis behind "federalism = if it ain't broke, don't fix it."

I can see the pros behind the ideology of both parties. I embrace alittle of both; it's why I consider myself to be a Moderate despite being a registered Democrat. For me, I take "WE, THE PEOPLE" seriously in that our collective rights can only be preserved if WE recognize what they are and are willing to fight to maintain them even if from time to time we may have to be an island unto ourselves.

Pretty much:

If you want progressive policies for change, vote Democrat

If you want the USA to be like it was in the 1980's vote Republican.
 
So how do you like paying for your local school Dist. $$$$levy$$$$ Fellow Idahoan? We're a Republican controlled state right?(LOL)

I think I know a lot about schools in America and their early days. It was normal in California where I lived for almost all of my life to be taxed in property taxes for schools. I am not sure how Idaho does this. I would enjoy learning the system Idaho uses.
 
Pretty much:

If you want progressive policies for change, vote Democrat

If you want the USA to be like it was in the 1980's vote Republican.

Another way of saying this is since 1933 the Democrats spent the majority of time running this country with few exceptions. Presidents carry out orders of the Congress and carry out constitutional duties. I consider the Congress far more a danger than any president can be. Look at the impeachments for instance.

Progressive means shorthand for Communist or in many cases merely socialism.

If you want freedom known to those around 1800, vote republican. If you want how reduced it became by 1941, stick to the Democrats. They have all of us covered up in so many laws we are guilty of committing around 4 felonies daily and did not realize it.
 
:roll:

Democrats view government through a "united, forward-thinking" prism, that "we're all in this together" and that "change isn't a bad thing; it's how the nation evolves over time embracing new ideas".

Republicans are "protectionist" who believe that "old tried and true ideals (principles) are worth preserving" firmly believing that some things should remain "static, unchanged", that the individual is more important than the collective. Wash, rinse, repeat is the basis behind "federalism = if it ain't broke, don't fix it."

I can see the pros behind the ideology of both parties. I embrace alittle of both; it's why I consider myself to be a Moderate despite being a registered Democrat. For me, I take "WE, THE PEOPLE" seriously in that our collective rights can only be preserved if WE recognize what they are and are willing to fight to maintain them even if from time to time we may have to be an island unto ourselves.

I do not doubt that many fine Democrats think this is how their party is. But they are wrong. Flat out wrong. The party is not as you describe them. The public voting for Democrats are fooled. I compare them to the lone sheep chatting with a pack of wolves all discussing what to eat for dinner. Wolves do not tell Sheep the truth.

We the people are who republicans represent. Ask this of Democrats. They supported Slavery. The current lie is they reformed. But did they reform? Check Democrat run cities all over America and notice the treatment of blacks today in those cities. Notice for instance in Baltimore who lives today in those slums. What good did it do the slum dwellers to keep voting in Democrats to rule their lives?
 
The F-22 is good but not THAT good. It's RADAR negates some of its stealth which also restricts the weapons it carries. The Euro Typhoon isn't far behind for much less cost and the helmet mounted display is an advantage.
I'm not sure why you're talking about the B-52 landing on aircraft carriers !

The US Navy's aircraft are ageing and being replaced by F-35 which, shall we say, has a few criticisms. A lot actually

What "fake" claims are the Democrats unable to back up ?


FDR and JFK were probably America's greatest ever presidents. Now we have this pompous clown that's destroying American Democracy bit by bit - foreign policy is already a train wreck. Trump is a total idiot and a new president will find it hard to repair the damage Trump has done America's reputation in the world.

No, Tweeting is the way Trump gives his views. Many of them showing how disconnected and deranged he is.
Even today the Attorney General say Trumps tweets are making his job impossible (I guess you missed that story)


Attorney General Says Tweets Make It Impossible for Him to Do His Job - WSJ


Comments ?

The F-22 will outfight the F-35 one on one.

So long as the Navy gets the F-35 and is able to keep up the maintenance, new a F-35 is also a fine war plane. Frankly in my opinion all of our Fighters are top rate. Even some of our older fighters are awesome. The B-52 as a heavy bomber has not been replaced yet. This is why the Air Force has not retired them and still flies them. It can't fit on an Aircraft carrier as some wish it could. Sure, one or several might land there, and i very highly doubt they can land on only 1100 feet runway, but with massive parachutes, who knows?

We know the Carrier is only one of the ships in a carrier group and have a lot of missiles that are very capable of long distance attacks. Yet the Air Force keeps the ancient B-52 flying.

As an old man, I count myself kind of rare here to have voted for Kennedy. Was he great? As his then supporter you bet I want to rate him great. The simple truth as one of his Army soldiers, I do not rate my former selection as great. I rate him as so so. I definitely recall our terror as he went after the Soviet union over Cuba. FDR had he been great would have defeated Castro in Cuba sparing the Cubans dictators. He was so close to Cuba yet failed to follow through as Castro ravaged Cuba. Democrats for a strange reason became fond of Cuba and Castro and Obama proved his loyalty by defying American Cubans to open it up.

FDR as president could have caused Congress to assemble a very large army which would have helped defray Hitler and had he not sent the fleet to its fate at Pearl Harbor ,not lose so many ships to the Japanese attack forces. He handed a super Target to Japan so they took him up on his offer. FDR was told by a Navy intelligence officer then in Tokyo how to get America into the war and that plan is what FDR followed.

FDR leap frogged this country deep into socialism as well. This is why Democrats admire FDR.

I know what Barr said in full context. So I am not fooled by that criticism of Trump given the way you talked bad about Trump in totality.

Bashing Trump in no way is an answer to the statement that Democrats are very bad for America. I see no defense to my claims.

If one lives in Chicago, Oakland, CA or Baltimore, they know what Democrats did to those cities. All saying to blacks, those slums are great places to live. So stay in those slums.

A Baltimore Mayor now in prison for her crimes walked Baltimore Streets and noticed how the blacks live. Those slums still exist though she is locked up.

 
Another way of saying this is since 1933 the Democrats spent the majority of time running this country with few exceptions. Presidents carry out orders of the Congress and carry out constitutional duties. I consider the Congress far more a danger than any president can be. Look at the impeachments for instance.

How do impeachments present a threat, no president has ever been removed by one ?


Progressive means shorthand for Communist or in many cases merely socialism.

LOL

Explain why progress (and therefore progressive policies that achieve this) is an economic movement towards communism

Why can't progressive policies ensure freedom like the banning of guns ?

Like public health care ?

Why should progressive laws include the conservative law like The Patriot Act ?

Is allowing same sex marriage, homosexuality in the armed forces and free trade not worth supporting ?

What is wrong with redistributing wealth through the taxation system ?


If you want freedom known to those around 1800, vote republican....


Yes if you want to return to how things were in 1800 vote for the regressive policies of the conservatives

The USA should be looking to improve and go forward, not turn the clock back 200+ years and return to the past


If you want how reduced it became by 1941, stick to the Democrats. They have all of us covered up in so many laws we are guilty of committing around 4 felonies daily and did not realize it.


Like what ?
 
The F-22 will outfight the F-35 one on one.

At long range, yes

Are you familiar with the European Meteor missile now equipping Eurofighter Typhoons ?

So long as the Navy gets the F-35 and is able to keep up the maintenance, new a F-35 is also a fine war plane.

Splutter

The F-35 has been a disaster of a project

There are many problems with it:


"But the reality may be worse. According to documents exclusively obtained by Defense News, the F-35 continues to be marred by flaws and glitches that, if left unfixed, could create risks to pilot safety and call into question the fighter jet’s ability to accomplish key parts of its mission:

F-35B and F-35C pilots, compelled to observe limitations on airspeed to avoid damage to the F-35’s airframe or stealth coating. Cockpit pressure spikes that cause “excruciating” ear and sinus pain. Issues with the helmet-mounted display and night vision camera that contribute to the difficulty of landing the F-35C on an aircraft carrier....
"


The Pentagon is battling the clock to fix serious, unreported F-35 problems


I challenge you to post a link to a good review by anyone not employed by the US DoD or Lockheed-Martin


Frankly in my opinion all of our Fighters are top rate....


What is your qualification for voicing such an opinion ?
Are you employed in the defense industry ?
Are you an aeronautical engineer ?



Even some of our older fighters are awesome.

By what criteria ?


The B-52 as a heavy bomber has not been replaced yet.

Despite other bombers coming into service

But carpet bombing is seen as a bad tactic in these times of smart bombs and precision and yes a B-52 can carry a smart bomb, but so can many other airframes


We know the Carrier is only one of the ships in a carrier group and have a lot of missiles that are very capable of long distance attacks. Yet the Air Force keeps the ancient B-52 flying.

Super carriers are super expensive and are hugely vulnerable to a missile attack from the shore

I think their time is over

Smaller carriers are the way forward with about just 15-20 aircraft
Yes they're vulnerable too, but more can be built


As an old man, I count myself kind of rare here to have voted for Kennedy. Was he great? As his then supporter you bet I want to rate him great. The simple truth as one of his Army soldiers, I do not rate my former selection as great. I rate him as so so. I definitely recall our terror as he went after the Soviet union over Cuba. FDR had he been great would have defeated Castro in Cuba sparing the Cubans dictators. He was so close to Cuba yet failed to follow through as Castro ravaged Cuba. Democrats for a strange reason became fond of Cuba and Castro and Obama proved his loyalty by defying American Cubans to open it up.

It's not up to the USA to decide what form of government other countries should have

In London there are statues of three presidents, can you guess who they are ?


FDR as president could have caused Congress to assemble a very large army which would have helped defray Hitler and had he not sent the fleet to its fate at Pearl Harbor ,not lose so many ships to the Japanese attack forces.


What ships did the USA lose at Pearl Harbor ?

I can think of just two old battleships that would not have altered the war at all, and a training ship


He handed a super Target to Japan so they took him up on his offer. FDR was told by a Navy intelligence officer then in Tokyo how to get America into the war and that plan is what FDR followed.

FDR leap frogged this country deep into socialism as well. This is why Democrats admire FDR.


There is no evidence that the attack on Pearl Harbor was know about in advance or that the relatively small losses suffered were avoidable

And FDR had no socialist policies
I suspect you don't know what socialism is


Bashing Trump in no way is an answer to the statement that Democrats are very bad for America..

But opposition to him protects democracy and freedom.
 
FDR and JFK were probably America's greatest ever presidents.

Really shows the true colors of progressives when they pick FDR as one of the greatest presidents.

FDR was a racist, an antisemite, and he committed the worst civil rights violation in US history with EO 9066. Yet he's a progressive hero.
 
Really shows the true colors of progressives when they pick FDR as one of the greatest presidents.

FDR was a racist, an antisemite, and he committed the worst civil rights violation in US history with EO 9066. Yet he's a progressive hero.

Did FDR have any anti-black or anti-jewish policies ?

Yes the internment of Japanese-Americans was both unjust and racist, Italian-Americans and German-Americans weren't interned but it was thought Japanese-Americans would not have assimilated as much into American society and harbor sympathies to their homeland, because they weren't while

I don't think you can blame FDR specifically for this, probably any president up to that time would have done the same.

FDR was a great president - as proven by his 4 re-elections

No president comes even close to what he achieved


Republican presidential candidates would probably stayed out of the European war until it was too late.
That's how stupid they were.
 
Did FDR have any anti-black or anti-jewish policies ?

Yes, he did. Shouldn't you know that before declaring him to be one of the greatest presidents ever?

Yes the internment of Japanese-Americans was both unjust and racist, Italian-Americans and German-Americans weren't interned

Yes, they were, by the thousands:

Internment of German Americans - Wikipedia
Internment of Italian Americans - Wikipedia

FDR was a great president - as proven by his 4 re-elections

If Trump wins reelection that's evidence of his greatness.
 
Did FDR have any anti-black or anti-jewish policies ?

Yes the internment of Japanese-Americans was both unjust and racist, Italian-Americans and German-Americans weren't interned but it was thought Japanese-Americans would not have assimilated as much into American society and harbor sympathies to their homeland, because they weren't while

I don't think you can blame FDR specifically for this, probably any president up to that time would have done the same.

FDR was a great president - as proven by his 4 re-elections

No president comes even close to what he achieved


Republican presidential candidates would probably stayed out of the European war until it was too late.
That's how stupid they were.

Both anti black and anti semite.

Blacks. Refused to allow them into infantry roles for his entire presidency. Even Movies with their fakery do not show black soldiers in the fight in either theater. And relegated a fighter training base for blacks and if you look up Tuskegee Airmen, you can learn about it.

Jews tried to enter the USA on a then famous ship and Roosevelt keep them out and they had to return to Germany to meet their fate there.

Italians and Germans that were US citizens also locked up. Many were forced to work on farms producing food due to the war needs. Santa Rita Jail in N California housed them for the SF Bay area. For many years I used to see the old housing at the jail.

Why did he win 4 elections. For a man of his age and ability to talk to the citizens on radio, he fared well. And some of the candidates he faced amounted to losers.

He achieved ripping the country apart and in essence tried to model us on the economic model Hitler used. For Hitler it worked. For Roosevelt his entry into WW2 cured the depression.
 
Yes, he did. Shouldn't you know that before declaring him to be one of the greatest presidents ever?

What policies would they be ?

Yes, they were, by the thousands:


But they were Germans or Italians

I checked and a few were "ethnic Germans" which I think means first generation immigrants immigrants

Joe Di Maggio wasn't interned now was he ?

Or Charles Lindbergh


If Trump wins reelection that's evidence of his greatness.


No, the stupidity and sheep like tendencies of his followers.
 
I can go into enormous reasoning yet my capping argument would be, How to explain politics among both republicans vs Democrats in easy terms.

Democrats live a life of no orgasams, where as Republicans enjoy massive and frequent orgasms.

This not sexually, but politically.

I am not fighting with Democrats. I realize they do not grasp what I am saying.

So to begin,

My major fight is against those who can't tolerate the human condition known as Freedom for all of us.

I tolerate them since I am actually the kind of Libearal well known by the Founders.

YES, that kind of Libearal.

What kind was it? Well it fought to have a rather tiny Fedearal goverment A good kind of orgasim.

Democrats desire to tax us to death.

We get told "You did not create that."

You must pay higher taxes.

You better follow Democrats since they have a well planned way to rule you.

Use petroleum products? How the hell dare you, Republicans.

We know far better than you know what is better. Do not try to hold on to freedom since we do not tolerate your freedom.

"We are your rulers. So stop this crap you need orgasms. we will tax you further for having them."



So vote for us. You do not deserve freedom.

Oh so your a socialist who thinks the government should hand you everything? You don't like taxes, who does? Do you like the roads you drive on? Your fire department, cops, schools and a host of other things? Sure you do. Then why is the singular major beef from republicans taxes?

In a modern growing society there is no such thing as small government of any kind. Hell my county government is huge. Republicans live in a fictional world in their minds, the world of the long dead founding fathers. Isn't it time for a bit of an update after more than two hundred years?
 
At long range, yes

Are you familiar with the European Meteor missile now equipping Eurofighter Typhoons ?

The F-35 has been a disaster of a project
There are many problems with it:


"But the reality may be worse. According to documents exclusively obtained by Defense News, the F-35 continues to be marred by flaws and glitches that, if left unfixed, could create risks to pilot safety and call into question the fighter jet’s ability to accomplish key parts of its mission:

F-35B and F-35C pilots, compelled to observe limitations on airspeed to avoid damage to the F-35’s airframe or stealth coating. Cockpit pressure spikes that cause “excruciating” ear and sinus pain. Issues with the helmet-mounted display and night vision camera that contribute to the difficulty of landing the F-35C on an aircraft carrier....
"
The Pentagon is battling the clock to fix serious, unreported F-35 problems


continued next post
 
Back
Top Bottom