- Joined
- Feb 16, 2013
- Messages
- 5,768
- Reaction score
- 2,932
- Location
- California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
The South was the one which desperately wanted war with Mexico in order to spread slavery. The north saw it as an unjustified land grab. Guess what we did?
The South was allowed to send squads of guerrillas to attack those who opposed slavery in places like Kansas and Missouri. Outlaws like the James brothers got their start in those roving bands of thugs, who were some of the most sadistic out there.
Time and time again legislation was pushed through to support or protect slavery and slavers. The Compromise of 1850, which was supposed to have settled the issue, was violated over and over in order to expand slavery as much as possible.
In the run up to the war southern sympathizers were allowed to loot federal armories to equip their slaver forces.
Southerners literally physically attacked those who opposed slavery on multiple occasions with impunity.
Southerners nearly got us into a shooting match with Spain over Cuba decades before the Spanish American War.
Pretending the South was oppressed is simply ignorant.
Well said. Your opponent seems to believe in the Lost Cause. Cotton and tobacco were the most lucrative trade items in the entire US at the time, all grown in the South. Slavery was the key and power sharing became the tool the South attempted with the Missouri Compromise and the war with Mexico. The South wanted more slave states so they could protect the institution of slavery from Northern Abolitionists. All the rest is Lost Cause garbage.