• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

One Hundred Questions

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rexedgar

Rexedgar

Yo-Semite!
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
63,201
Reaction score
52,899
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
The Senate Majority Leader began his opening comments by noting how many questions were addressed in yesterday’s session. Think of how many more questions could be addressed if the archaic procedure of walking each question to the bench was modified....
 
Rexedgar said:
The Senate Majority Leader began his opening comments by noting how many questions were addressed in yesterday’s session. Think of how many more questions could be addressed if the archaic procedure of walking each question to the bench was modified....
Click to expand...

You mean modified by constitutional means? This forum is for constitutional matters, isn't it?
 
JD1965 said:
You mean modified by constitutional means? This forum is for constitutional matters, isn't it?
Click to expand...

Isn’t impeachment a Constitutional process?


Has your laundry gotten back yet?....:doh
 
Rexedgar said:
Isn’t impeachment a Constitutional process?


Has your laundry gotten back yet?....:doh
Click to expand...

Your question is about a legislative/procedural matter, not a constitutional one. You wouldn't proprose an amendment about a procedural rule.

In other words, this thread, just like your other, is a smoke bomb in the wrong forum.
 
JD1965 said:
Your question is about a legislative/procedural matter, not a constitutional one. You wouldn't proprose an amendment about a procedural rule.

In other words, this thread, just like your other, is a smoke bomb in the wrong forum.
Click to expand...


You need at least 65 posts to be considered for management, just sayin’.
 
Rexedgar said:
You passed muster; I wish you a long tenure @ DP!.........:2wave:
Click to expand...


Thanks?

Where are you with the Article V Convention issue? Because if one were called, you could be delegate, and work with other delegates to discover how to make the legislative branch begin working in the interests of the people.
 
Rexedgar said:
The Senate Majority Leader began his opening comments by noting how many questions were addressed in yesterday’s session. Think of how many more questions could be addressed if the archaic procedure of walking each question to the bench was modified....
Click to expand...

Maybe the Senate will learn there's such a thing as a computer ?
 
Moderator's Warning:
Closing thread as it has nothing to do with the US Constitution.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom