• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Founders Be Hornswoggled

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rexedgar

Yo-Semite!
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
63,251
Reaction score
52,949
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
This show cannot be what Hamilton, Jefferson et al had in mind. This will not change a single partisan mind. As another poster stated, “.......240 years was a good run.......”
 
This show cannot be what Hamilton, Jefferson et al had in mind. This will not change a single partisan mind. As another poster stated, “.......240 years was a good run.......”

The democrats need a big score and even if it's after this farce of a trial. Something like Rudy's indictment would do very well.
 
The democrats need a big score and even if it's after this farce of a trial. Something like Rudy's indictment would do very well.

Rudy will be indicted in the next 12 months.
 
It's about informed consent. The public can't be all "we didn't know" later.
 
The democrats need a big score and even if it's after this farce of a trial. Something like Rudy's indictment would do very well.

So according to you, this is all about Democrats "scoring," and "big."
 
So according to you, this is all about Democrats "scoring," and "big."

What I mean is that it's going to take a ****ing bombshell, nothing short of a smoking gun, that will convince the right that this man and his administration is devastating this country. You can put whatever connotation or meaning you want to my words, but I'm only telling you and others that there must be something so out in the open, so horrible and so undeniable that people will have to turn from supporting him. Indicting Rudy would be the beginning of the end, and yes, a ****ing bombshell.
 
What I mean is that it's going to take a ****ing bombshell, nothing short of a smoking gun, that will convince the right that this man and his administration is devastating this country. You can put whatever connotation or meaning you want to my words, but I'm only telling you and others that there must be something so out in the open, so horrible and so undeniable that people will have to turn from supporting him. Indicting Rudy would be the beginning of the end, and yes, a ****ing bombshell.

I'm taking the plain meaning of what you actually said.
 
So according to you, this is all about Democrats "scoring," and "big."

It's putting the situation in another context.

The ultimate objective is to get rid of Trump and put a Democrat in the White House (as well as a majority of congressmen and senators)
 
It's putting the situation in another context.

The ultimate objective is to get rid of Trump and put a Democrat in the White House (as well as a majority of congressmen and senators)

You don't say.
 
The democrats need a big score and even if it's after this farce of a trial. Something like Rudy's indictment would do very well.
Rudy will be indicted in the next 12 months.
Rudy will not be indicted as long as Trump is in office and Barr works for him. Unless SDNY goes rogue, which is always a possibility.
 
Rudy will not be indicted as long as Trump is in office and Barr works for him. Unless SDNY goes rogue, which is always a possibility.

If and when Trump is removed from office both he and Rudy can expect to face charges.
 
Rudy will not be indicted as long as Trump is in office and Barr works for him. Unless SDNY goes rogue, which is always a possibility.

Barr has already faced internal pressures from the FBI regarding the firing of two directors, and the issues with the Mueller investigation. The last thing that he needs is the US Attorneys from the SDNY staging a palace revolt and I think that if there's one thing that intimidates Bill Barr, it's the extraordinary lawyers at the SDNY.

The SDNY has long been known as being a semi-autonomous federal district investigative arm, always been 'sort of rogue'. I believe he's going to stay out of this one because Rudy and the other two guys have been caught red-handed, there's evidence against them. Hard evidence. You can't stop that kind of investigation without riling up the people.
 
Barr has already faced internal pressures from the FBI regarding the firing of two directors, and the issues with the Mueller investigation. The last thing that he needs is the US Attorneys from the SDNY staging a palace revolt and I think that if there's one thing that intimidates Bill Barr, it's the extraordinary lawyers at the SDNY.

The SDNY has long been known as being a semi-autonomous federal district investigative arm, always been 'sort of rogue'. I believe he's going to stay out of this one because Rudy and the other two guys have been caught red-handed, there's evidence against them. Hard evidence. You can't stop that kind of investigation without riling up the people.
If so (Barr stays out of SDNY), can you imagine the pressure the President will put on him?
 
What I mean is that it's going to take a ****ing bombshell, nothing short of a smoking gun, that will convince the right that this man and his administration is devastating this country. You can put whatever connotation or meaning you want to my words, but I'm only telling you and others that there must be something so out in the open, so horrible and so undeniable that people will have to turn from supporting him. Indicting Rudy would be the beginning of the end, and yes, a ****ing bombshell.

I don't think Giuliani getting indicted would make the slightest bit of difference to Trump supporters. Why would it? Nothing else does.
 
I don't think Giuliani getting indicted would make the slightest bit of difference to Trump supporters. Why would it? Nothing else does.

Trump getting removed from office in the impeachment trial would (even though it looks like that is an impossibility)

Commentators have suggested Trump will try to stay in office anyway, even if that means locking himself in the bathroom of the Oval Office.

With his supporters demand that the impeachment trial is ignored ?
 
Trump getting removed from office in the impeachment trial would (even though it looks like that is an impossibility)

Commentators have suggested Trump will try to stay in office anyway, even if that means locking himself in the bathroom of the Oval Office.

With his supporters demand that the impeachment trial is ignored ?

Trump supporters in the Senate are the only people standing between Trump and conviction. So the slightest bit of difference I mentioned can't be removal from office.
 
Trump supporters in the Senate are the only people standing between Trump and conviction. So the slightest bit of difference I mentioned can't be removal from office.

The point is that Trump might not go quietly.

Those GOP senators have a big decision to make - by all accounts they detest Trump but fear his power even if removed from office.
 
The point is that Trump might not go quietly.

Those GOP senators have a big decision to make - by all accounts they detest Trump but fear his power even if removed from office.

You state the obvious often.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom