• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Founders Be Hornswoggled

Status
Not open for further replies.
It will only be a bombshell if Giuliani admits under oath that he was working under the instruction of Trump. The fact that Trump went to Guilliani instead of his intelligence, DOD, and SOS means nothing to his supporters although that alone proves he didn’t want them involved for his bribery attempt.

President Trump denied knowing about a May 2019 letter from his personal attorney Rudy Giuliani requesting a private meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, despite Giuliani claiming that he was reaching out with Trump's "knowledge and consent."

Trump claims he didn'''t know about Giuliani letter to Zelensky - Axios

This is the excerpt from that letter and it may be a little unclear but it says:

"However, I have a more specific request. In my capacity as personal counsel to President Trump and with his knowledge and consent, I request a meeting with you on this upcoming Monday, May 13th or Tuesday, May 14th. I will need no more than a half-hour of your time and I will be accompanied by my colleague Victoria Toensing, a distinguished American attorney who is very familiar with this matter.

Please have you office let me know what time or times are convenient for you, and Victoria and I will be there."

imageedit-4-9609238821.jpg
 
I suppose today's news reports of "your head will be on a pike" was "fantasy" news ?
LOL, as if the other side isn't doing the same things? Have you seen Schumer lately? Or more concisely, I see it as a BFD.
 
So you admit that a constitutional crisis is possible ?

I never denied it. You're annoying me.

Listen. I don't mean to be rude, but I do want you to understand. I have nothing further to say to you. I wish you health and happiness, but I don't want to prolong my interaction with you. Best wishes.
 
Voters in the states where those GOP senators are will remember too.

Were they supposed to win over Kavanaugh ?

What was supposed to be "won" in the Stormy Daniels scandal ?

Rich,
The Democrats wanted to block the confirmation of Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. But the evidence from Blasey Ford was specious and flimsy.
The Democrats wanted to nail Trump with a campaign violations crime charging Trump with paying off pornstar Stormy Daniels with money designated a campaign funds.
 
Maybe the best solution would be to begin anew from scratch?
 
LOL, as if the other side isn't doing the same things? Have you seen Schumer lately? Or more concisely, I see it as a BFD.

The Democrats don't go after congreemen or senators that don't votes with the rest.

Trump made big play over the fact that two Democratic congressmen voted against impeachment - now you make a claim that the Democratic party is Stalinist and behaves like Trump with GOP senators.

Which is it ?

You can't have it both ways ?


Do you think making overt threats like "heads on a pike" is healthy for an impeachment trial ?
 
Rich,
The Democrats wanted to block the confirmation of Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. But the evidence from Blasey Ford was specious and flimsy.
The Democrats wanted to nail Trump with a campaign violations crime charging Trump with paying off pornstar Stormy Daniels with money designated a campaign funds.

Both were worthy and justified.

Kavanaugh is unworthy of a seat on the Supreme Court and how Trump retains the support of Christians is a mystery (especially in light of a recent editorial in a Christian magazine)

Christianity Today editor: Trump's 'public morality' makes him 'unfit' for office | TheHill


Trump has not seen the last of his campaign corruption - he'll be arrested on criminal charges the moment his office can't protect him.
 
I never denied it. You're annoying me.

So are you saying it's "obvious" and doesn't need stating ?

So be annoyed.


Listen. I don't mean to be rude, but I do want you to understand. I have nothing further to say to you. I wish you health and happiness, but I don't want to prolong my interaction with you. Best wishes.


OK

You have little to say anyway except one-liner vitriol.
 
So are you saying it's "obvious" and doesn't need stating ?

So be annoyed.





OK

You have little to say anyway except one-liner vitriol.

Look up the word obvious. Then look up the word vitriol.

That you list yourself as liberal is why liberals keep losing. And honestly, people like you make me want to vote against all of you.
 
Look up the word obvious. Then look up the word vitriol.

I've a fair idea of what they mean, I'm not sure you accept their definitions though.

Again a meaningless one line comment, utterly devoid of reasoned argument


That you list yourself as liberal is why liberals keep losing. And honestly, people like you make me want to vote against all of you.

You probably do.

Again you post a brief one liner, in lieu of anything remotly descriptive of what you mean.

You're like a "oh no it's not" pantomime performer.

You have nothing to say but your vitriol.
 
The Democrats don't go after congreemen or senators that don't votes with the rest.
And you know that how? Remember at the start of the new Congress a group of Reps was going to challenge Pelosi? She shut them up pretty damn quick
Rich2018 said:
Trump made big play over the fact that two Democratic congressmen voted against impeachment - now you make a claim that the Democratic party is Stalinist and behaves like Trump with GOP senators.
Wow 2 out of 235, it's a revolution. Oh, and one of them was so disgusted he changed parties.
Rich2018 said:
Which is it ?

You can't have it both ways ?
I have no idea which ways you're prattling about.

rich2018 said:
Do you think making overt threats like "heads on a pike" is healthy for an impeachment trial ?
That was Schiff that said it based on an anonymous NYT article. Every Republican Senator was outraged and called Schiff a liar.
 
Kavanaugh is unworthy of a seat on the Supreme Court and how Trump retains the support of Christians is a mystery (especially in light of a recent editorial in a Christian magazine)[/url]

The founder of the Magazine endorses Trump.

Every Christian voter should be on this forum. Just here they would see why every Christian should vote straight Republican in every election for every office. The pro-active rabid hatred of Christians and Christianity by so many Democrats on this forum would leave no question as to why.
 
This show cannot be what Hamilton, Jefferson et al had in mind. This will not change a single partisan mind. As another poster stated, “.......240 years was a good run.......”

Perhaps the House should have a 60% majority to vote to impeach ?
 
The founder of the Magazine endorses Trump.

So what

He's being a Republican not a Christian


Every Christian voter should be on this forum. Just here they would see why every Christian should vote straight Republican in every election for every office. The pro-active rabid hatred of Christians and Christianity by so many Democrats on this forum would leave no question as to why.


Religion is a bad thing and causes so much harm.

But what values Christianity has are not shared by the Republican party.

Both have become highly regressive institutions.
 
The democrats need a big score and even if it's after this farce of a trial. Something like Rudy's indictment would do very well.

Democrats don't need to score big to win 2020, they just need to drop the batsh11t crazy nonsense from their platform. (well, okay, it may be too late for 2020).
 
The democrats need a big score and even if it's after this farce of a trial. Something like Rudy's indictment would do very well.

they needed a big score after that farce hearing that is for sure. after 3 years of losing they need something.
 
Democrats don't need to score big to win 2020, they just need to drop the batsh11t crazy nonsense from their platform. (well, okay, it may be too late for 2020).

Too late their TDS has reached max level 20. they cannot go any higher than what they already are.
 
they needed a big score after that farce hearing that is for sure. after 3 years of losing they need something.

No, they've wounded Trump who every day acts more and more like a guilty man trying desperately to cover up his tracks.

GOP senators, who acquit Trump and are up for reelection this year, will have their supine character used against them.
The "heads on a pike" comment will haunt them on election day.
 
No, they've wounded Trump who every day acts more and more like a guilty man trying desperately to cover up his tracks.

GOP senators, who acquit Trump and are up for reelection this year, will have their supine character used against them.
The "heads on a pike" comment will haunt them on election day.

They have done nothing. the only people that believe they have accomplished anything are their sycophant leftist of this country.
No they won't. Senators that vote to acquit trump will vote because there is no evidence to remove him from office.

you see to say someone is guilty you need more than we don't like him
and he won an election.

you actually have to have evidence.

also there will be a few democrat senators that will vote to acquit him as well.
they are not the leftist rabid morons that most of them are.
 
They have done nothing. the only people that believe they have accomplished anything are their sycophant leftist of this country.

So have the sycophant rightists in the country won anything

To Trump's die hard fans, the impeachment is a farce, to anyone with an open mind, it has shown what a corrupt liar Trump really is and how totally unfit for public office he is.
He is wounded in the minds of people who might vote either way.

Senators that vote to acquit trump will vote because there is no evidence to remove him from office.

Do not tell me you actually believe that.
GOP senators who vote to acquit do so out of self preservation, not because of the overwhelming body of evidence against Trump.

I still hold out hope that people want a senator who'll stand up for them, no cower down to threats of having their heads on a pike.


you see to say someone is guilty you need more than we don't like him

Trump is guilty
He is corrupt
He abuses power daily
He is also an utterly repugnant man.

He is doing great damage to the USA and its interests and one can only hope he loses power this year one way or another, and the period of repair and recovery can begin.
 
So have the sycophant rightists in the country won anything

To Trump's die hard fans, the impeachment is a farce, to anyone with an open mind, it has shown what a corrupt liar Trump really is and how totally unfit for public office he is.
He is wounded in the minds of people who might vote either way.

To anyone with any kind of critical thinking skills it has shown just how inept and deranged the left of this country is.
So far the only people showing they are unfit for office is schiff and pelosi.



Do not tell me you actually believe that.
GOP senators who vote to acquit do so out of self preservation, not because of the overwhelming body of evidence against Trump.

I still hold out hope that people want a senator who'll stand up for them, no cower down to threats of having their heads on a pike.




Trump is guilty
He is corrupt
He abuses power daily
He is also an utterly repugnant man.

He is doing great damage to the USA and its interests and one can only hope he loses power this year one way or another, and the period of repair and recovery can begin.[/QUOTE]
 
This show cannot be what Hamilton, Jefferson et al had in mind. This will not change a single partisan mind. As another poster stated, “.......240 years was a good run.......”

Is this your default of plausible deniability? You believe what the Framers envisioned is lost to us?
 
To anyone with any kind of critical thinking skills it has shown just how inept and deranged the left of this country is.
So far the only people showing they are unfit for office is schiff and pelosi....

Since when did "critical thinking skills" equate to being a blind loyal Trumper full of nationalistic and parochial views.

Speaker of the Houe Nancy Pelosi has been the main protection we have had from Trump and his manic behavious this past 12 months

Congressmen Adam Schiff has conducted himself with dignity and professionalism in the face of excessive and moronic behavior from Trump who thinks the USA can be governed by ranting to staffers and inane Twitter comments (often unprofessional and betraying that he's unfit for any office - none more so that his recent Tweet of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi in Arab dress.

Respect for the office is another thing that Trump has destroyed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom