- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
- Messages
- 586
- Reaction score
- 56
- Location
- Transient
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Your opinion can hardly be called "even handed" and seriously undermines any accusation from you of not being able to "examine all of the situation"
I am the only person alive who has an even hand of thinking. I am the only person who figured out that the three-part government model is inaccurate and that there is a more logical formula for dividing the government.
United States Fourth Continental Congress
The founders, and subsequent generations, have only had one simple formula to work with, and it is mistakenly used to formulate separate "branches," where as, what it actually describes are the three phases for processing law, which would then be the subdivisions of the proper branches. The proper branches of government are supposed to be demarcated by the main partitions of civil law: sovereignty, martial, diplomacy, commerce, trust, and property law. The founders were probably unable to determine the main partitions, and they were definitely unable to organize the proper separation, because of the stricter qualification standards that such specifications would prescribe - they just did not have the information revealed to determine the peer groups, nor the sophisticated manpower available to recruit, during the founding eras of the nation and adjoining states.
You get that through your ****ing head, you stupid dumb **** racist.
Only a racist would be against having a constitutional convention that gathers the diversity of people that the founders could not gather. And no doubt, you do not want to have a constitutional convention. Nobody at Debate Politics wants to do it, except me. I am the only person accepting of the diversity to hear their ideas for making this a better government for the people, by the people, of the people.
Last edited: