• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Electoral College Members Can Defy Voters’ Wishes, Court Rules

You can continue with this mental masturbatiuon by yourself.

Yes, uttered by the person employing this method by interjecting with irrelevant commentary. You can spare yourself that mental masturbation by following along and typing responses germane to what’s being discussed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I agree. But for the same reason, WY won't see candidates in a popular vote election either. The current US population is about 330 million. WY is about 570,000 (@2/10 of 1% of the population). If CA had the same representation as WY in the Electoral College, CA would have @139 votes in the electoral college.

In my view WY should have 570,000 votes in the presidential election

No vote should be wasted.
All votes should be worth something.
 
Back
Top Bottom