- Joined
- Apr 25, 2010
- Messages
- 80,422
- Reaction score
- 29,077
- Location
- Pittsburgh
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Re: 14th Amendment - Original Intent and Roe V Wade
1.) what rights are you referring too? they dont have legal rights . .i do have human rights if you believe in them
2.) legally, no. persons are born
3.) again what rights are you talkign about. list them
4.) none is needed because person in this regard is a legal term not scientific.
If you want scientific the words you are looking for are human (adj) and A human (noun)
a ZEF is always human (adj), a Fetus is always a human (noun)
5.) see thats perfect that is based on legality and ZEFs are not persons in that regard
but even if they were the issue is . . .so is the woman and because one life resides inside another theres no way to give equal rights . . one will always lose out
1.) What about the rights of the unborn?
2.) Aren't they a person also?
3.) What happened to their rights?
4.) I have yet to see any scientific evidence that a fetus is not a person.
5.)"deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"
1.) what rights are you referring too? they dont have legal rights . .i do have human rights if you believe in them
2.) legally, no. persons are born
3.) again what rights are you talkign about. list them
4.) none is needed because person in this regard is a legal term not scientific.
If you want scientific the words you are looking for are human (adj) and A human (noun)
a ZEF is always human (adj), a Fetus is always a human (noun)
5.) see thats perfect that is based on legality and ZEFs are not persons in that regard
but even if they were the issue is . . .so is the woman and because one life resides inside another theres no way to give equal rights . . one will always lose out