• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Understanding_ The Constitution is to serve the promotion of the values set forth in The Preamble

RealityNow

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 22, 2019
Messages
17,149
Reaction score
6,827
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
The Preamble spoke the plan of and for simple truths of what this nation is about and what is it to do in service as a nation and unto and for the people, by the voice of the people....!!! One'self might want to check themselves and review themselves that they may discover the congruent ideals that make and embrace a congregant manner in character and disposition... to be a promoter of what constitutes and promotes civility.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

America MUST become a mutually supporting society of Multicultural Heritage and Multicultural Make Up.... if America is committed to having a better future as being "AMERICA"... which honors its own Declaration of Independence, and Supports its own "Preamble to The Constitution" and supports the Government Designed by the Principles of The Constitution.

How we got off track from the original design of the Declaration of Independence, and violated the values of The Preamble and basterdized the provision of The Constitution:

History has documented much of such. Various "promotions of the "white nationalist agenda"... and its aim to "try and dictate to people how they should live". While the one trying to do the dictations were themselves... not living to meet the standards set forth in the Declaration of Independence, and fighting against the principle factors "The Preamble Outlined" for the benefit of All"... We had 100's of years of such mad drive ideals of "white nationalist ignorance that proceeded to convoluted the laws in their favor, and even great favor for those who gained and held wealthy", and the plutocrats invading and dominating the political systems and perverting it to promote their ideals of "white nationalism of wealthy white male dominance'.. All of which, did and does great dishonor to the Declaration of Independence, and constricts the elements of design in "the Preamble", and used that malice to contort the words of Interpretations of The Constitution... and in doing so, filled the Courts with White Nationalist Idealist.
People need to face the truth, and the truth is: White nationalism designed by, for and of wealthy white male dominance agenda, has for centuries and decades; damaged the lives of poor whites, male and female, minorities, male and female, and women in general, and non wealthy immigrants . if you doubt that, look across the nation with your eye and mind open and aware.

The perversions that became to infect and infest itself in the white right evangelicals, and the many offshoot factions that sought to contort and bastardize the denominational religious, to meet with the elements of 'racist ideology" based on the concepts of "white nationalist ignorance".

America is on a pathway by the broader base of people becoming more educated, and exposing these madness of the past. The Age of Information is bringing awareness to the elements that need exposure and corrective adjustments, and today more and more young people are growing up being made aware of the past that was taken down a wrong way directions and caused generations upon generations of damage to all sectors and systems in America.

We need a reinvestment in "Civics Education" wholly.... !!!! among All American Citizens
 
Last edited:
So many civics teachers are bad enough slanting their teaching toward their right wing views. Many history teachers in the public schools can be just as bad, coloring the curriculum with their brown shirt views.

Yet looking back on it and only some years after our 6th grade teacher -- an old maid -- many of us recognized she was a Bircher which was of course way back when. Today that same teacher would be a Putin-Trump Rower.

After all this Putin-Trump And Rowers madness has passed we will need a new national reconstruction from coast to coast and border to border. A second national reconstruction under the Constitution of course, or at least what's left of it and that we can revise and reconstruct to meet the challenges going forward from the enemies of the USA both foreign and domestic.


11 heinous lies conservatives are teaching America's schoolchildren

The right has a new plan to capture the country's youth vote: Take over public school curriculums


If recent elections have taught us anything, it’s that young Americans have taken a decided turn to the left. Young voters delivered Obama the election: the under-44 set voted Obama and the over-45 set broke for Romney. The youngest voters, age 18-29, gave Obama a whopping 60 percent of their vote.

Now Republicans have a plan to try to recapture the youngest voters out there: Take over the curriculum in public schools, replace education with a bunch of conservative propaganda, and reap the benefits of having a new generation that can’t tell reality from right-wing fantasy.

How well this plan will work is debatable, but in the meantime, these shenanigans present the very real possibility that public school students will graduate without a proper education. To make it worse, many of these attempts to rewrite school curriculum are happening in Texas, which can set the textbook standards for the entire country by simply wielding its power as one of the biggest school textbook markets there is.

With that in mind, here’s a list of 11 lies your kid may be in danger of learning in school.


11 heinous lies conservatives are teaching America's schoolchildren | Salon.com


This is an excellent illustration that contradicts directly the Putin-Trump And Rowers campaign that "truth is not true."
 
This thread's OP is as diametric opposite from the true of the view of the USA's founders as possible.

The core concept of was of near total freedom at the expensive of near total self reliance and responsibility. There were essentially NO social program

They also wanted the absolute minimal federal government. The federal government's sole income was from tariffs and the federal government had to pay its way, no debt spending. There were virtually no federal criminal laws nor federal law enforcement.

They did NOT want people from everyone in the world. They only wanted white people and black people for slaves.

They saw foreign products and imports from virtual slave labor colonies of other countries, most notably the UK/British, that they imposed major tariffs to protect the American economy and work force.

The Democratic Party's stance - and moreso of most modern progressives - on every issue is exactly opposite from the country the founders wanted to establish.
 
So many civics teachers are bad enough slanting their teaching toward their right wing views. Many history teachers in the public schools can be just as bad, coloring the curriculum with their brown shirt views.

Yet looking back on it and only some years after our 6th grade teacher -- an old maid -- many of us recognized she was a Bircher which was of course way back when. Today that same teacher would be a Putin-Trump Rower.

After all this Putin-Trump And Rowers madness has passed we will need a new national reconstruction from coast to coast and border to border. A second national reconstruction under the Constitution of course, or at least what's left of it and that we can revise and reconstruct to meet the challenges going forward from the enemies of the USA both foreign and domestic.


11 heinous lies conservatives are teaching America's schoolchildren

The right has a new plan to capture the country's youth vote: Take over public school curriculums


If recent elections have taught us anything, it’s that young Americans have taken a decided turn to the left. Young voters delivered Obama the election: the under-44 set voted Obama and the over-45 set broke for Romney. The youngest voters, age 18-29, gave Obama a whopping 60 percent of their vote.

Now Republicans have a plan to try to recapture the youngest voters out there: Take over the curriculum in public schools, replace education with a bunch of conservative propaganda, and reap the benefits of having a new generation that can’t tell reality from right-wing fantasy.

How well this plan will work is debatable, but in the meantime, these shenanigans present the very real possibility that public school students will graduate without a proper education. To make it worse, many of these attempts to rewrite school curriculum are happening in Texas, which can set the textbook standards for the entire country by simply wielding its power as one of the biggest school textbook markets there is.

With that in mind, here’s a list of 11 lies your kid may be in danger of learning in school.


11 heinous lies conservatives are teaching America's schoolchildren | Salon.com


This is an excellent illustration that contradicts directly the Putin-Trump And Rowers campaign that "truth is not true."
what a humongous pile of crap!! No redeeming value at all. As sick and perverted as it alleges the right of being. Cherry picked blather from the most extremist edges.
 
This thread's OP is as diametric opposite from the true of the view of the USA's founders as possible.

The core concept of was of near total freedom at the expensive of near total self reliance and responsibility. There were essentially NO social program

They also wanted the absolute minimal federal government. The federal government's sole income was from tariffs and the federal government had to pay its way, no debt spending. There were virtually no federal criminal laws nor federal law enforcement.

They did NOT want people from everyone in the world. They only wanted white people and black people for slaves.

They saw foreign products and imports from virtual slave labor colonies of other countries, most notably the UK/British, that they imposed major tariffs to protect the American economy and work force.

The Democratic Party's stance - and moreso of most modern progressives - on every issue is exactly opposite from the country the founders wanted to establish.

Your commentary sounds as if you are interested in promoting and giving sanction to "white nationalist agenda"... and its aim to "try and dictate to people how they should live" and seeking to promote some delusion that America belong to white people, and is only for white people. That aim and attempt has been tried, and all it produced was a bastardization of "the principles" of what is Independence and tries to impose segregationist ideals upon and within the values stated by The Preamble, all of which aim has produced atrocities that are devastating to the entirity of the nation and its multicultural, multi-ethnic make up of people.

You purely overlook what the value is of what is a "Principle".... "The Principles" of what the words of the Declaration of Independence and The Preamble Speak.... You are promoting the same mindset that led to the bastardization of those words in the promotion of "white nationalist idealism".

Until that mindset of white nationalism interpretation is vanquished, America will struggle and it will continue its acts of desecrating the lives of poor whites, male and female, minorities, male and female, and women in general, and non wealthy immigrants.

It matters greatly, that people learn in the foundation of understanding "principle".... to know what is meant by the words "In God We Trust"...
 
Last edited:
So many civics teachers are bad enough slanting their teaching toward their right wing views. Many history teachers in the public schools can be just as bad, coloring the curriculum with their brown shirt views.

Yet looking back on it and only some years after our 6th grade teacher -- an old maid -- many of us recognized she was a Bircher which was of course way back when. Today that same teacher would be a Putin-Trump Rower.

After all this Putin-Trump And Rowers madness has passed we will need a new national reconstruction from coast to coast and border to border. A second national reconstruction under the Constitution of course, or at least what's left of it and that we can revise and reconstruct to meet the challenges going forward from the enemies of the USA both foreign and domestic.


11 heinous lies conservatives are teaching America's schoolchildren

The right has a new plan to capture the country's youth vote: Take over public school curriculums


If recent elections have taught us anything, it’s that young Americans have taken a decided turn to the left. Young voters delivered Obama the election: the under-44 set voted Obama and the over-45 set broke for Romney. The youngest voters, age 18-29, gave Obama a whopping 60 percent of their vote.

Now Republicans have a plan to try to recapture the youngest voters out there: Take over the curriculum in public schools, replace education with a bunch of conservative propaganda, and reap the benefits of having a new generation that can’t tell reality from right-wing fantasy.

How well this plan will work is debatable, but in the meantime, these shenanigans present the very real possibility that public school students will graduate without a proper education. To make it worse, many of these attempts to rewrite school curriculum are happening in Texas, which can set the textbook standards for the entire country by simply wielding its power as one of the biggest school textbook markets there is.

With that in mind, here’s a list of 11 lies your kid may be in danger of learning in school.


11 heinous lies conservatives are teaching America's schoolchildren | Salon.com


This is an excellent illustration that contradicts directly the Putin-Trump And Rowers campaign that "truth is not true."

Considering that John Yoo is now teaching law at Stanford Law School, the desecration of constitutional principles is now institutionalized. The American Experiment has failed to thunderous applause and broad appeal.
 
what a humongous pile of crap!! No redeeming value at all. As sick and perverted as it alleges the right of being. Cherry picked blather from the most extremist edges.

Where I come from you leave no doubt I am accurate. Which earns for me thunderous applause and a standing O. So although I hate to admit it you make me blush. It's just not for any purpose of yours.








Considering that John Yoo is now teaching law at Stanford Law School, the desecration of constitutional principles is now institutionalized. The American Experiment has failed to thunderous applause and broad appeal.

You're rich when you go full hog OTT. Sometimes you get onto something but you blow it each time cause you just get up and run on out of the plane without a parachute.
 
Where I come from you leave no doubt I am accurate. Which earns for me thunderous applause and a standing O. So although I hate to admit it you make me blush. It's just not for any purpose of yours.
Where you come from? The Looniocracy of progsville? I'm not surprised. You guys have a history of self-deluded idiocy.
 
what a humongous pile of crap!! No redeeming value at all. As sick and perverted as it alleges the right of being. Cherry picked blather from the most extremist edges.

IOW, you have no ability to refute the 11 points.

Nice!
 
IOW, you have no ability to refute the 11 points.

Nice!
Already did - see the part that says "cherry picked from the most extremist edges"? That pretty much covers it.
 
Already did - see the part that says "cherry picked from the most extremist edges"? That pretty much covers it.

Nah, bruh. That's called 'running away'. There's nothing 'cherry-picked' about them. You sure you understand what that term means?
 
Nah, bruh. That's called 'running away'. There's nothing 'cherry-picked' about them. You sure you understand what that term means?
Nope. Except that none of the eleven points represents broad or universally accepted "truths" on the right; each were chosen (cherry picked) to represent the most exaggerated or minority opinion of a small segment of the right.
 
Nope. Except that none of the eleven points represents broad or universally accepted "truths" on the right; each were chosen (cherry picked) to represent the most exaggerated or minority opinion of a small segment of the right.

No, to try and assert they were 'cherry picked' is to lie. Simply claiming that they are won't magically make them so. Are they accurate or inaccurate?
 
No, to try and assert they were 'cherry picked' is to lie. Simply claiming that they are won't magically make them so. Are they accurate or inaccurate?
I covered that already. Try to keep up.
 
“The core concept of was of near total freedom at the expensive of near total self reliance and responsibility. There were essentially NO social program”

Well, no, that is not factually correct. There were plenty of social programs that existed before the Revolution in the colonies that were adopted into law when we became a nation.

They were based on British poor laws of 1601. Basically, in each state, those who could not physically work were taken care of in almshouses where the basics were furnished with public money. Those who could not find work were made to work for the state, tools and training and pay given by the state. Now, the bums of the times were sent to prison (or debtors' prison) and the state would take the resulting paupered children and put them to work as well; including clothing and feeding them.

I think that it would be more accurate to say that many social programs were NOT supported by the centralized government while we were under the Articles of Confederation and that the individual states picked those programs up on their own.

“They also wanted the absolute minimal federal government. The federal government's sole income was from tariffs and the federal government had to pay its way, no debt spending. There were virtually no federal criminal laws nor federal law enforcement.”

Well, if we are talking about the US's time under the Articles of Confederation then I would say that you would be...sort of...correct. There were federal agencies even then that enforce law, however limited in scope in might have been. Example: Postal Service had a law enforcement department in 1772.

However, under the Constitution, we have the oldest federal law enforcement agency; the US Marshals, established in 1789 as well as the Coast Guard in enforcement of said tariffs. And yes, there were federal crimes as established in the Crimes Act of 1790.

And yes, you are correct that tariffs and protectionism were the primary sources of income for the federal government until 1861 when we passed the first income tax to pay for the Civil War.

However, the idea that the US did not do debt spending is wrong. In our entire history, we have had only one year span (1835-36) where there was debt spending because there was no debt.

In fact, before we had the Constitution and were under the Articles, the whole point of why the Whiskey Rebellion even happened was due to Washington and Congress absorbing the war debt of the 13 states. Then Hamilton proposed to pay off that now huge (for the time) federal debt by imposing a federal luxury tax, and then later a smaller nanny tax, on the sale of US whiskey.

“They did NOT want people from everyone in the world. They only wanted white people and black people for slaves.”

Some truth to this, but only insofar that those they wanted to keep out were white Europeans of different areas of Europe and Britain. Example, the Germans were greatly disliked at the time; even Franklin despised them. The Irish as well. And that would happen again a hundred plus years later.

At the time, there were no such thing as Latinos...just the Spanish colonies to the south that were not encroaching on the US, so that wasn't a problem. There were almost no one from the Middle East (Jew or Muslim), so that wasn't a problem. The only dark-skinned persons in the US were the slaves that white US citizens bought to work for them and the Native American Indian.

“They saw foreign products and imports from virtual slave labor colonies of other countries, most notably the UK/British, that they imposed major tariffs to protect the American economy and work force.”

Again, factually incorrect. Yes, we did do business with nations that had slavery, but our primary business was not with the colonies on our side of the world, but with the European markets. Most of our trade came from that.

Here's the other part of it. We were already shifting away from mercantilism as soon as we won our freedom. By the time we adopted the Constitution, we were already trying to promote capitalism into European markets to get them to do business with us that way. That caused a couple of bad things to happen to us.

The southern European nations like Italy, were favorable to capitalism as well as certain ME and northern African states. Britain, France and Spain felt threatened by it and encouraged the Barbary Pirates (who we were paying off at the time) to attack our shipping; thus the Barbary Wars.

Second, we learned what happened when we imposed extreme tariffs or halted trade with Europe: we bankrupted our own nation in less than 18 months....right to the eve of the War of 1812.

“The Democratic Party's stance - and moreso of most modern progressives - on every issue is exactly opposite from the country the founders wanted to establish.”

Well, no. I would not even say that of the average conservative, but I would say it of conservative leadership.
 
Thinking people, investigate history and outline various facts that current day, Conservative (Confederacy Idealist) Republicans would rather ignore and try and disregard and seek ultimately to deny.

We've seen anything and everything of mis information promoted by modern day "Conservative (Confederacy Idealist) Republicans"... as they are deeply entrenched into the groomed in mentality of "White Nationalism of Wealthy White Male Dominance" and all the contorted ideals that have been thrust upon and against the American Poor. ( The American Poor = Poor whites, male and female, Minorities, male and female, Poor Immigrants and Non White Poor Immigrants, male and female and the whole of "women" in general ) this goes back to the days where women were not even considered "Person", and the America Poor had their vote dictated to them by the wealthy, and in many cases it was their wealthy employer who coecered them to cast their vote in the manner and focus of the wealthy employer.

The basics of many poor whites "could not read', they were generally "uneducated in politics" and manipulated by "drama antics" promoted by the self interest of the wealthy white male segments of society. We knew the slave was prohibited from reading, but what was interesting and amazing was that the slave were in ear shot of the conversations of the wealthy white males, so they had insight and information of the malice driven self interest being crafted by the wealthy whites along with being under the repressive horrors of being enslaved; so they knew the issues far more than the general uneducated segments white population.

As the post by Jason Warfield points out many factors and facts that are ill considered and generally ignored by the Conservative (Confederacy Idealist) Republicans. Today, there is a great deal of historical political illiteracy within the Conservative (Confederacy Idealist) Republicans; in great part due to the long history of appealing to the ideals of "white supremacy ideology"; which was designed for the "White Nationalism of Wealthy White Male Dominance". the poor whites were commonly used at "foot soldier" contained and maintained to protect the interest and position of the "White Nationalism of Wealthy White Male Dominance". History documents that in the long history of "generational poor whites".... This was further driven and enacted by the history which had great disdain for whites from various parts of Europe, who were considered to be from the lowest bowels of Europe, uneducated and in many ways considered the criminal and thieves before they came to American and were considered the same upon their arrival in America. They were to be the cheap labor along side the systems of the Slave Labor programming, all directed to benefit the programming of "White Nationalism of Wealthy White Male Dominance" !

Not much has changed in all these 10's of decades... except the identity over time of some of the once despised, being incorporated into the category of 'whiteness", still to be "foot soldier" to protect the wealthy, and the wealthy among them, enlisted to support and promote "White Nationalism of Wealthy White Male Dominance".

The Ideals of the Declaration of Independence was bastardized, as was The Constitution mis-interpreted and that mis interpretation was promoted as being for "whites only"... at the detriment to minorities, women and the general poor of society. The values laid out in The Preamble was considered to be for "whites only"... and for 10's of decades, the tax monies of America were channeled to the Well To Do Interest, and the Interest of the Wealthy.... again, at the expense of the American Poor.

Sadly, its still much of the process being promoted this very day by the Conservative (Confederacy Idealist) Republicans.
 
Last edited:
Where I come from you leave no doubt I am accurate. Which earns for me thunderous applause and a standing O. So although I hate to admit it you make me blush. It's just not for any purpose of yours.










You're rich when you go full hog OTT. Sometimes you get onto something but you blow it each time cause you just get up and run on out of the plane without a parachute.

This isn't a contest Tangmo. If it makes you squirm, it's cool. If it makes you effectively defend John Yoo, I've made my point. Thank you.
 
Today, if one looks at the "Let's kill or let die" millions of Americans, of which the recent Republican Health Care Plan proposed; to the massive Tax Give Away to the wealthy... to the system of Tariff's which will directly and has directly impacted the "working poor", and will further decimates the dire poor, whites, blacks and women. To the acts against the Immigration of people of color from any nations that has a predominance of darker skin persons.

We see the devastation of Mexico and Central America, where there is absolutely no upstanding and proactive efforts by the white dominated and led Conservative (Confederacy Idealist) Republicans to call and convene a summit to 'get to the truths of facts and craft policy", that can help improve the North and Central American Hemisphere... to become to function in "unison" to improve the Hemispheric Economics and Civic Progress of this region of the Hemisphere.

Instead, they are talking about "building walls"... instead of crafting "Cooperative Mutual Benefit Agreements". As a result... what we will see is the advances of China, Russia and Europeans moving into build up the Mexico and Central American Nations. It will soon become Central America that will embrace the system of the AIIB, and when that advances to show performance, Mexico will by conditions be put forth to make the choice as well to engage and seek its benefits of the AIIB. The key elements will be the expansion of exports for Mexico to other regions of the globe and the influx of investments to take proactive benefit of the character of the Mexican and Central America for the nature of devotion they have long exhibited for being "willing workers".
The element of character which is well known of Mexican and Central America people, is... they will gladly do the works that many in America won't do, and they take pride in those works as it is their family oriented mentality that gives them the drive and the fortitude to not denigrate work, by playing status games when it comes to the work and types of work they engage.

American elitism will continue to damage America, because many Americans have been groomed to not want to do certain works, and that has a long history back to the American embrace of slavery, where whites considered many types of work to be beneath their willing to want to do various works.

Today, the systems of the "university deception game" has made Americans think the only valuable work is 'pursuing a paper pushing job", or "giving orders to others"... and having a "title" before or behind their name. The old system of the early 20th Century, where whites were given the "less labor intensive works" under the system of segregation, has seen today..the desire to carry that madness forward, even in the areas of "whites not taking advantage of Federal funded training programs', because many feel that such programs are only for the minority poor. Thus so, as a result, the unskilled, untrained and uneducated among the white poor is a continuing program that has them crying..."we've been left behind"... when fact is, they chose to run backwards, still chasing the past.
 
We need to get to the point of respecting the Ideals and Principles of the Declaration of Independence, and Respect, Support and Promote the Values of The Preamble and stand up for the Ethical Principles that The Constitution was designed to support and promote for "ALL AMERICANS".

There are no more massive volume of repair and maintenance shops that once upon a time, gave the poor uneducated and unskilled whites an avenue, because today, we live in a society that has a saturation of "disposable products". We see many Home service repair shops being dominated by whites as the last grasp at an old system of whites hiring whites in the repair and technical maintenance shops. Today... even homes are becoming "technology equipped" and that requires a level of "education" to work on the systems of today. Many ignored that training over decades, while other minority, women and others chose to get that training, be it in the expanse to include health care work and many other fields.

The Reagan Era desecration of Community Colleges and the Excessive Increase in University Education cost, has damaged both poor whites and minorities... while the system of today, gives false hope to the excessive cost and over burden young who are financally captured into cycles of challenge, by the debt, when the job markets have no means to accommodate them.

Sadly, many are still pursuing the system of "white entrenchment" in hopes that the system of "White Nationalist Wealthy White Male Dominance, will save them. This is the lust for and obsession they have for Trump... when truth and fact is... the "Wealthy White Male, of White Nationalism" have never cared for the poor whites, other than to enlist them and keep them chasing the carrot on the stick, while serving to be foot soldiers to protect the "Wealthy White Male, of White Nationalism".

We all know this is fact... as all of us, know many working poor and poor whites, who are "good people"... but misled by the history that promoted and supported the ideals that subjected this nation to segregationist systems. That system no longer exist, and will not return, yet.. they are fed the drama antics to keep them with vain delusions of such a repeat of history... When America is becoming every day... more broad based multicultural and will become more so as the future unfolds. It's time they "join in" and become an integral part of Multicultural unity as Americans.
 
Nope. Except that none of the eleven points represents broad or universally accepted "truths" on the right; each were chosen (cherry picked) to represent the most exaggerated or minority opinion of a small segment of the right.

Psst...Most progressives think GOPs are all ultra-right wingers.
 
Psst...Most progressives think GOPs are all ultra-right wingers.

That's not true...

from above post:

We all know this is fact... as all of us, know many working poor and poor whites, who are "good people"... but misled by the history that promoted and supported the ideals that subjected this nation to segregationist systems. That system no longer exist, and will not return, yet.. they are fed the drama antics to keep them with vain delusions of such a repeat of history... When America is becoming every day... more broad based multicultural and will become more so as the future unfolds. It's time they "join in" and become an integral part of Multicultural unity as Americans.

What many GOP's have been led to follow is the ideal that the "GOP" is the party of and for white people. and they are groomed to follow it based on that concept... as if they think they will betray their racial ethnicity, if they don't follow the "GOP" political apparatus... Even when they see and know that it does not serve their best interest nor the best interest of America. They are led to think Progressive Ideals... will strip away the historical premise of "white privilege", even when they know they are among the masses whom white privilege was not designed for.... White Privilege was designed for "Wealthy White Men, who Support and Promote White Nationalism". The civic level of whites privilege was an illusion fed to poor whites, by giving them low level first accessibility, in the circle of the low pay system, while it promoted dominance by the well to do whites and the wealthy whites in the higher pay arena.. where they wielded power to keep that system in place for the wealthy and the well to do whites ... as a system of "White Dominance of and by and for "Wealthy White Men".
 
That's not true...



What many GOP's have been led to follow is the ideal that the "GOP" is the party of and for white people. and they are groomed to follow it based on that concept... as if they think they will betray their racial ethnicity, if they don't follow the "GOP" political apparatus... Even when they see and know that it does not serve their best interest nor the best interest of America. They are led to think Progressive Ideals... will strip away the historical premise of "white privilege", even when they know they are among the masses whom white privilege was not designed for.... White Privilege was designed for "Wealthy White Men, who Support and Promote White Nationalism". The civic level of whites privilege was an illusion fed to poor whites, by giving them low level first accessibility, in the circle of the low pay system, while it promoted dominance by the well to do whites and the wealthy whites in the higher pay arena.. where they wielded power to keep that system in place for the wealthy and the well to do whites ... as a system of "White Dominance of and by and for "Wealthy White Men".

Ah Jeeze. You are so misinformed.
 
Back
Top Bottom