• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Anticipating the Train Wreck

I am very confident that the only way to approach "solving our nation's various problems," is going to require a new set of rules for organizing the talks and deliberating the resolution(s) - new constitution.

What are the "various problems," that are so important, that we need to adjust them before we bully the president into regret for even thinking of campaigning to be the president who thinks he knows how to do things better than us?

It will require nothing less than divine intervention to prevent the next president from receiving more vitriol than what Trump is enduring - the cat is out of the bag. The goal, from now on, is always going to be to cause the train wreck - presidential resignation. The media has been way ahead of the peon citizenry.

Nobody really cares about solving the social problems we endure, because the original system, if it was designed to solve social problems, it was reconfigured by amendments and laws that deviate from solving the social problems. In particular the Seventeenth Amendment deviated our ability to recognize faulty state legislatures, which gets closer to the municipalities and our better understanding that "all politics (that matter) is local."

"Prove your own community before you go telling us how to do community," would be the creed of a better political organization.

The premise behind the creation of this country was that the federal government NOT solve "social problems" but rather stays out of both personal and social issues entirely.
 
Yeah well, the only way we are going to correct that problem is by reordering the charters to properly disqualify candidacy.

So would you support returning to literacy tests for voters to assure they are minimally qualified?
 
The premise behind the creation of this country was that the federal government NOT solve "social problems" but rather stays out of both personal and social issues entirely.
Sounds good to me, but it seems that political advocacy groups tend to use the national platform as their starting point. So, my campaign for a reorganization of the entire three-level system does anticipate that "politics" will be more focused at the local and state levels, and the federal government is more concerned about foreign relations and ensuring that the states play by their rules.


So would you support returning to literacy tests for voters to assure they are minimally qualified?
I have been contemplating a more strict qualification for voters for more strict office qualifications. I have very sophisticated hierarchy for the municipal council system for the largest municipalities. Basically, citizens need to have a job to vote for a municipal council member who will also be the highest ranking officer of their labor union. But for the district wide elections: mayor, governor, and president; just citizenship is qualification for voting and office.
 
lmao, maybe you should fix your understanding of the English language and go back through high school or something to work on your critical thinking and problem solving skills.
Are you serious? Did you read the entry you wrote that prompted all of this???

If you don't see how we can fix our system without completely redoing it from the ground up, then you just lack imagination. Also, I lol'd so hard at the original quote about being worried about having Bernie as our nominee. First of all, that's not going to happen, no matter how much I'd like it to. Secondly, if it did, by some miracle, he'd beat Trump by the largest victory margin in living memory, and we'd be well on our way to a better world, assuming anyone would work with him on his policies, which is unlikely, because the establishment hates him.
The paragraph seems to have two unrelated subjects, and you should know better than to end a sentence with a preposition. Where is the original quote about Sanders that you are referring to???

I can assure you, I am the best critical thinker in the world. I figured out that the problem is that the government model that we know and trust (dogma), is inadequately organized, because even the best and noblest of statesmen did not have the information concerning government operations that would be necessary for ordering a more reliable charter. The governing system that controls the American society is inadequately separated, improperly commissioned, and not well graduated; and cannot be corrected by even the most sophisticated amendment systems. Consequently, this causes a stalling effect on the approach to justice and tranquility.

The founders, and subsequent generations, only had one simple formula to work with, and a relatively limited supply of paper, ink, endurance, and basically strict parameters of designs that would engage the few literate citizens in 1787. The formula accurately divides the government into the three phases of governing, but what they did not have was a formula for the subsequent divisions of those three parts; and consequently, what we have now, is a semi-chaotic mess that is politely referred to as “political gridlock,” that trickles down in the forms of corruption, hypocrisy, hysteria, frustration, criminality, and violence.

No agency is an independent agency if it is dependent on the other parts of the same level of government to graduate its administrative hierarchy, which is the problem with the judiciary, Federal Reserve, and Department of Justice. Although, the intentions of dividing the appointment process between the executive and legislative branches was honorable, because no one could generate a reorganization plan that gives the government lawyers and economists, their own systems to graduate their ranks. The checks and balances do not work correctly, and so the faulty system always leads the politicians and crony beureacrats to the chaos of partisan bickering and witch hunts, which trickles down into the common behavior of the citizens. All of which is more active because of the technological enhancements in commercial reporting and political campaigning than what was thought possible way back when the system was established.

The realization that we should have a constitutional convention that involves all of the racial demographics at the fabled table, should be the irrefutable argument that commences the revolution, but there is a problem. It appears that the only people with anything close to reformation plans to get the party started, are white men; and non-whites are probably going to resent that aspect of the process. But we do need to get the show on the road if we want to solve the complex grievances conflicted in social stratification issues such as the residual effects of instituted racial discrimination that continue to oppress non-white people, and reparations for slavery.

There is an anecdote in American culture that suggests that the Constitution is not perfect, which implies why the government is the way it is, but people are reluctant to actually try to refine the approach to a more reliable government, because of the lack of practical reorganization plans,…and reverence for the storied founding and Revolutionary War, and the Continental Congress that wrote it and the Declaration of Independence, and the amazing qualities of the three parts, and the ability to fix any problems with an amendment policy built right into the document itself - absolutely amazing! There is no possible "better way" of doing it! It is the greatest thing ever written! The Founders were so far ahead of their time - they're ahead of our time! Brilliant - absolutely brilliant!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom