- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
- Messages
- 586
- Reaction score
- 56
- Location
- Transient
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Eventually, the states, municipalities, and federal government will have to be reorganized.
First and foremost, the fact that there are multiple interpretations of the almighty United States Constitution is a major problem, now, than when the compromise was institutionalized by the Supreme Court decision that concluded that it was the Court's mission to interpret the Constitution. Modern organizational techniques and sophistication should lead us to recognize that such a compromise is unacceptable. It is absurd to believe that the compromise is acceptable and then complain that the other people are not interpreting the Constitution correctly.
The realization that we should have a constitutional convention that involves all of the racial demographics at the fabled table, should be the irrefutable argument that commences the revolution, but there is a problem. It appears that the only people with anything close to reformation plans to get the party started, are white men; and non-whites are probably going to resent that aspect of the process. But we do need to get the show on the road if we want to solve the complex grievances conflicted in social stratification issues such as the residual effects of instituted racial discrimination that continue to depress non-white people, and reparations for slavery.
The only way to solve the grievances of systemic racial biases will require constitutional conventions that include non-white delegates to the conventions to guard against the racially biased policies.
The American governing system is flawed, because even the best and noblest of statesmen did not have the information concerning government operations that would be necessary for ordering a more reliable charter. The governing system that controls the American society is inadequately separated, improperly commissioned, and not well graduated; and cannot be corrected by even the most sophisticated amendment systems. Consequently, this causes a stalling effect on the approach to justice and tranquility.
To approach the proper deliberation of the economic and cultural issues that honest and sophisticated people expect of a well designed government, the entire multi-level system will have to be reordered. Amendments to the subsisting constitutions will not correct the faulty structure of the government, because the structure of the government is relative to the outline of the charter (table of contents). Casual review of any of the contemporary charters that comprise our three-level government system will reveal that the charters are inconsistently organized and contain rambling passages that, consequently, explain why other nations cannot replicate the governing system that we know and trust (dogma), and illustrates how our sophist legal practitioners and corporate entities exploit the ambiguous terms and obscure inadequacies. Corruption is not symptomatic of nefarious persons manipulating an altruistic just governing system; but rather, it is symptomatic of nefarious persons manipulating a perpetually faulty system. Perpetual corruption is ultimately symptomatic of an inadequate separation and coordination of the government responsibilities.
The founders, and subsequent generations, only had one simple formula to work with, and a relatively limited supply of paper, ink, endurance, and basically strict parameters of designs that would engage the few literate citizens in 1787. The formula accurately divides the government into the three phases of governing, but what they did not have was a formula for the subsequent divisions of those three parts; and consequently, what we have now, is a semi-chaotic mess that is politely referred to as “political gridlock,” that trickles down in the forms of corruption, hypocrisy, hysteria, frustration, criminality, and violence.
First and foremost, the fact that there are multiple interpretations of the almighty United States Constitution is a major problem, now, than when the compromise was institutionalized by the Supreme Court decision that concluded that it was the Court's mission to interpret the Constitution. Modern organizational techniques and sophistication should lead us to recognize that such a compromise is unacceptable. It is absurd to believe that the compromise is acceptable and then complain that the other people are not interpreting the Constitution correctly.
The realization that we should have a constitutional convention that involves all of the racial demographics at the fabled table, should be the irrefutable argument that commences the revolution, but there is a problem. It appears that the only people with anything close to reformation plans to get the party started, are white men; and non-whites are probably going to resent that aspect of the process. But we do need to get the show on the road if we want to solve the complex grievances conflicted in social stratification issues such as the residual effects of instituted racial discrimination that continue to depress non-white people, and reparations for slavery.
The only way to solve the grievances of systemic racial biases will require constitutional conventions that include non-white delegates to the conventions to guard against the racially biased policies.
The American governing system is flawed, because even the best and noblest of statesmen did not have the information concerning government operations that would be necessary for ordering a more reliable charter. The governing system that controls the American society is inadequately separated, improperly commissioned, and not well graduated; and cannot be corrected by even the most sophisticated amendment systems. Consequently, this causes a stalling effect on the approach to justice and tranquility.
To approach the proper deliberation of the economic and cultural issues that honest and sophisticated people expect of a well designed government, the entire multi-level system will have to be reordered. Amendments to the subsisting constitutions will not correct the faulty structure of the government, because the structure of the government is relative to the outline of the charter (table of contents). Casual review of any of the contemporary charters that comprise our three-level government system will reveal that the charters are inconsistently organized and contain rambling passages that, consequently, explain why other nations cannot replicate the governing system that we know and trust (dogma), and illustrates how our sophist legal practitioners and corporate entities exploit the ambiguous terms and obscure inadequacies. Corruption is not symptomatic of nefarious persons manipulating an altruistic just governing system; but rather, it is symptomatic of nefarious persons manipulating a perpetually faulty system. Perpetual corruption is ultimately symptomatic of an inadequate separation and coordination of the government responsibilities.
The founders, and subsequent generations, only had one simple formula to work with, and a relatively limited supply of paper, ink, endurance, and basically strict parameters of designs that would engage the few literate citizens in 1787. The formula accurately divides the government into the three phases of governing, but what they did not have was a formula for the subsequent divisions of those three parts; and consequently, what we have now, is a semi-chaotic mess that is politely referred to as “political gridlock,” that trickles down in the forms of corruption, hypocrisy, hysteria, frustration, criminality, and violence.
