• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If Bill of Rights and Enumerated Powers make liberalism illegal why do still have liberals?

ecofarm said:
"I gots me a boogeyman, and he makes me feel good!"
Click to expand...

typical liberal lacks ability to comment on OP, so plays Sigmund Freud rather than confront his ignorance.
 
Another completely idiotic right wing pile of ****, the forum is littered with this idiocy. iner everyt
 
Sampson Simpson said:
Another completely idiotic right wing pile of ****, the forum is littered with this idiocy. iner everyt
Click to expand...

but of course the liberal cant say why its idiocy but he is positive neverthless. See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance? Is any other conclusion possilble?
 
James972 said:
freedom of speech is legal but it is illegal for a liberal statist to hold office since they cant take the oath pledging loyalty to the Constitution which is about tiny central government or freedom from liberal central government
Click to expand...

Better take than one up with a constitutional scholar then
 
uptower said:
Better take than one up with a constitutional scholar then
Click to expand...

why? oath of office is pretty clear!! Liberals have to lie to hold office in America.
 
James972 said:
why? oath of office is pretty clear!! Liberals have to lie to hold office in America.
Click to expand...

To believe that one has to accept the premise that liberalism is incompatible with the constitution; and that a liberal must be specifically breaking one or another clause by...being liberal? This cannot be done in a simple forum post of a few hundred characters. Specifics will need to be outlined. I suggest an essay of no fewer than 1500 words; it will need a proper introduction and conclusion and main points outline showing cause and result. Citations will inevitably be required. It's actually more of an intellectual exercise in demonstrating one's points rather than just throwing out buzzwords like 'small government' punctuated with exclamation marks.

So I'm all ears if it can be clearly explained.
 
uptower said:
So I'm all ears if it can be clearly explained.
Click to expand...

easy, Sanders,AOC,Warren are open libcommunists. Constitution is about freedom from statist govt, not about totalitarian authoritarian communist govt. Now do you understand?
 
James972 said:
easy, Sanders,AOC,Warren are open libcommunists. Constitution is about freedom from statist govt, not about totalitarian authoritarian communist govt. Now do you understand?
Click to expand...

That doesn't explain anything.

It needs to look more like: clause X and Y of the constitution forbid liberalism because they expressly state Z. Therefore by committing offences A. B and C against Z, the following examples of liberalism are unconstitutional. Anything else is just screaming at the sky about 'libcommunists'.
 
James972 said:
but you cant say why it is silly?? How will you learn if your are afraid to try?
Click to expand...

first define liberalism

then show me where it is banned

now, since I am someone who has spent decades studying the constitution, I sort of get what you are saying. The tenth amendment, if properly enforced, should prevent or should have prevented much of the New Deal nonsense
 
James972 said:
can the liberal say how it is that liberalism, now socialism, is legal in America?
Click to expand...

You have made no argument to support your position. Just spouting off the Constitution or Amendments to it without an argument does not help you.
 
James972 said:
leftists liberals communists monarchists socialists fascists etc etc are all statists so all identical, and all illegal in America which is about freedom from statism. Now do you understand?
Click to expand...

Since you cannot even define a liberal correctly, your whole argument is VOIDED. Come back when you can type coherently.
 
James972 said:
can the liberal say how it is that liberalism, now socialism, is legal in America?
Click to expand...

We're not the ones making nonsensically outrageous claims here. That would be you which requires you to offer something...anything in the way of evidence or reasoned argument support your ridiculous claim.
 
uptower said:
That doesn't explain anything.
Click to expand...

Sanders and AOC are communists. Does the liberal think communism is compatible with Constitution? Notice the way a conservative is always made to feel like a kindergarten teacher?
 
TurtleDude said:
first define liberalism
then show me where it is banned
Click to expand...

liberalism is big govt, Constitution is to ensure tiny govt or freedom from big liberal govt. 1+1=2
 
TurtleDude said:
now, since I am someone who has spent decades studying the constitution, I sort of get what you are saying. The tenth amendment, if properly enforced, should prevent or should have prevented much of the New Deal nonsense
Click to expand...

yes and prevented Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez from even taking office. We see from how close to the Green New Deal we are how close to destruction we are.
 
OrphanSlug said:
You have made no argument to support your position.
Click to expand...

Constitution gives federal govt only Enumerated Powers; libcommies want to give it communist powers. Notice the way a conservative is always made to feel like a kindergarten teacher?
 
Praxas said:
Since you cannot even define a liberal correctly,
Click to expand...

if true why is liberal so afraid to give us correct definition? What did we learn from the liberals fear?

conservative=freedom from govt
liberal= love of govt
 
James972 said:
Constitution gives federal govt only Enumerated Powers; libcommies want to give it communist powers. Notice the way a conservative is always made to feel like a kindergarten teacher?
Click to expand...

That is a political argument, I am asking for an argument from you on what you think liberals want the government to do that you think the Constitution does not allow.
 
You all just don't understand. James will explain it to you and treat you like the children you are. I have seen the light and it is James. Praise the Lord!
 
James972 said:
Sanders and AOC are communists. Does the liberal think communism is compatible with Constitution? Notice the way a conservative is always made to feel like a kindergarten teacher?
Click to expand...

I'm not sure what the topic is anymore.

As I said, to discuss, with any degree of coherence, how liberalism might be incompatible with the constitution, a properly considered argument is required: background, basis, underlying theory and hypotheses; cause, effect, examples, results, findings, etc.

Rage tweeting at a few random names doesn't really explain it.
 
Hari Seldon said:
You all just don't understand. James will explain it to you and treat you like the children you are. I have seen the light and it is James. Praise the Lord!
Click to expand...

please don't be illiterate, I didn't invent conservatism, its been around for 2500 years. when personal attack is your only option that should tell you have lost the debate and its time to adopt a more intelligent POV so you won't be wrong all the time.
 
James972 said:
please don't be illiterate, I didn't invent conservatism, its been around for 2500 years. when personal attack is your only option that should tell you have lost the debate and its time to adopt a more intelligent POV so you won't be wrong all the time.
Click to expand...

I'll try but its so hard because I'm a "liberal". Thank you for all your wisdom.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom