Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 53 of 53

Thread: Gamble v. U.S.; a Pending SCOTUS Case where the Ruling Might Let Manafort Off the Hook.

  1. #51
    Professor
    Cordelier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:20 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    1,316

    Re: Gamble v. U.S.; a Pending SCOTUS Case where the Ruling Might Let Manafort Off the Hook.

    Quote Originally Posted by TurtleDude View Post
    LOL that is hilarious. Its more likely that the court in question actually took the tenth amendment seriously.
    It's "likely"? Are we dealing in likelihoods now?
    "If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell!" --- Carl Sandburg

  2. #52
    warrior of the wetlands
    TurtleDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:52 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    199,896

    Re: Gamble v. U.S.; a Pending SCOTUS Case where the Ruling Might Let Manafort Off the Hook.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cordelier View Post
    It's "likely"? Are we dealing in likelihoods now?
    well you have no proof of your claim. the fact is-even liberal scholars who liked what FDR did, noted that the FDR administration ignored the tenth amendment and essentially used political expediency to "amend" the constitution.
    Quote Originally Posted by jet57 View Post
    Yeah; a shotgun IS a rifle; it uses a different load.
    Quote Originally Posted by jet57 View Post
    You know that Reagan signed the Brady Bill - right?
    Quote Originally Posted by jet57 View Post
    I'm smart on the gun issue and what we need to do about it.

  3. #53
    Professor
    Cordelier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:20 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    1,316

    Re: Gamble v. U.S.; a Pending SCOTUS Case where the Ruling Might Let Manafort Off the Hook.

    Quote Originally Posted by TurtleDude View Post
    well you have no proof of your claim. the fact is-even liberal scholars who liked what FDR did, noted that the FDR administration ignored the tenth amendment and essentially used political expediency to "amend" the constitution.
    I didn't make a claim... I asked a question.
    "If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell!" --- Carl Sandburg

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •