• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The U.S. Constitution has no Allegienace of Adherance with the tRump and GOPer Enemy of the State.

Its like fishing in a barrel with you!

Only, because you've defined the barrel around extreme right Bull ****.


1. Sen. Bernie Sanders (Vt.)
In contrast to all the other names on this list downplaying their odds of running, Sanders seems to be gearing up for another go — and admitting it. Those around him seem to think it'll happen. He's a year older than Biden, but it's difficult to see why Democrats wouldn't believe he deserved a chance at being the nominee after what happened in 2016. And he remains pretty broadly popular with the American people. The big X-Factor here is the federal investigation into a land deal pursued by his wife, which appears to be no small nuisance.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ossible-2020-democratic-nominees-ranked/?utm_

He's not the Democratic leader … in any way and he's a progressive NOT a socialist/communist; nothing could be further from the truth.
 
He's not the Democratic leader … in any way and he's a progressive NOT a socialist/communist; nothing could be further from the truth.

Bernie Sanders is not a Democratic leader?????? Washington Post article I gave you said he was top leader in part because he got 2 highest votes in Democratic Party last time around. 1+1=2

He admits to being a socialist! but often talks like a communist. Let's not forget that Marx defined socialism as a stepping stone to Communism, that sanders honey mooned in the USSR, is best buds with Cornell West, and has supported many communist causes.
 
Nothing in our Constitution commits us to capitalism.

Pure insanity of course !! The Constitution limits the Federal govt to a few carefully enumerated powers and owning and running major companies is not one of those powers!!!!!

Now you can see why liberals want a living Constitution that they can morph into a progressive communist Constitution
 
The Constitution committed us to a government-run postal system, which is a form of socialism. In any case, the Constitution accommodated slavery for several decades; it will likely accommodate neo-fascism for at least a few years.
 
Bernie Sanders is not a Democratic leader?????? Washington Post article I gave you said he was top leader in part because he got 2 highest votes in Democratic Party last time around. 1+1=2

You said he was THE leader of the Democratic Party, now you're changing your to "top leader"; you should tell your teacher it's time to move on you've got 1+1 down pat; heck I'll bet you could handle 1+2 if not today … sooon.

He admits to being a socialist! but often talks like a communist. Let's not forget that Marx defined socialism as a stepping stone to Communism, that sanders honey mooned in the USSR, is best buds with Cornell West, and has supported many communist causes.

I'll go on record, right now, that he will NOT be the Democratic Party's nominee for President of The United States in 2020.

Pure insanity of course !! The Constitution limits the Federal govt to a few carefully enumerated powers and owning and running major companies is not one of those powers!!!!!

Capitalism is not mentioned in the Constitution of The United States.<--period

Now you can see why liberals want a living Constitution

The Constitution IS a living document made so by Article V that allows for Amendments.

that they can morph into a progressive communist Constitution

Nonsense!
 
You said he was THE leader of the Democratic Party, now you're changing your to "top leader"; you should tell your teacher it's time to move on you've got 1+1 down pat; heck I'll bet you could handle 1+2 if not today … sooon.

it doesn't matter if he's the leader or a top leader just that he's an anti American libsocialist and huge in Democrat Party
 
I'll go on record, right now, that he will NOT be the Democratic Party's nominee for President of The United States in 2020.


so what if not him another anti American libsocialist Democrat since that is where the Democrats are nowadays.
 
Capitalism is not mentioned in the Constitution of The United States.<--period

Not mentioned because it was 100% assumed to be normal like air and water. In any case federal govt was given a few enumerated powers and socialism was certainly the opposite of the powers given which were powers designed to keep govt very very tiny.
 
The Constitution IS a living document made so by Article V that allows for Amendments.
!

nobody including Sanders/Warren/Waters/Harris or the other libcommunist Democrats are using article 5 because it won't work for them so it has nothing to do with article 5
 
it doesn't matter if he's the leader or a top leader just that he's an anti American libsocialist and huge in Democrat Party

He’s anything BUT anti-American.
 
so what if not him another anti American libsocialist Democrat since that is where the Democrats are nowadays.

Democrats are not anti-American! What IS anti-American is the unsubstantiated lies you propagate to instigate hatred of your countrymen.
 
Not mentioned because it was 100% assumed to be normal like air and water. In any case federal govt was given a few enumerated powers and socialism was certainly the opposite of the powers given which were powers designed to keep govt very very tiny.

The powers granted to the Government by the Constitution are LIMITED to what is specified; they have nothing to do with size.
 
nobody including Sanders/Warren/Waters/Harris or the other libcommunist Democrats are using article 5 because it won't work for them so it has nothing to do with article 5

So “YOU” say ... now. The argument was is the Constitution a living document; article V says ... YES.
 
So “YOU” say ... now. The argument was is the Constitution a living document; article V says ... YES.

Our lib communists are not attempting to use Article 5 so it does not matter to this topic. Instead they are treasonously trying to pretend the rest of Constitution was intended to be living or communist. If Founders had said to country Constitution is living and can grow into anything it would not have been ratified in one single state. Do you understand?
 
The powers granted to the Government by the Constitution are LIMITED to what is specified; they have nothing to do with size.

Obamacommiecare or anything like is not specified by size or type
 
Someone's so-called president the 45 devil appears to indeed be a enemy of the U.S. Constitution as in its 'People' and civilization, etc.


'Enemy of the people': Trump's phrase and its echoes of totalitarianism
The phrase the president has repeatedly said in his attacks on the media was used by dictators including Stalin and Mao

Donald Trump’s repeated use of the phrase “enemies of the people” in his attacks on the media has stoked anger and fear not only because of general concerns that he is demonising a pillar of American democracy, but because of its echoes of totaliariansim.
The phrase has old roots, even appearing in a Shakespeare play, but it became well known in the 20th century when it was adopted by dictators from Stalin to Mao, and Nazi propagandists, to justify their murderous purges of millions.
Stalin was perhaps most closely associated with the phrase, which successor Nikita Khrushchev specifically denounced in a landmark speech after Stalin’s death, which he used to begin dismantling the dictator’s poisonous legacy.

'Disgusting news': Donald Trump whips up crowd anger as he vilifies

“Stalin originated the concept ‘enemy of the people’. This term automatically made it unnecessary that the ideological errors of a man be proven,” Khrushchev said in his secret address to the Communist party’s inner circle.
“It made possible the use of the cruellest repression, against anyone who in any way disagreed with Stalin, against those who were only suspected of hostile intent, against those who had bad reputations.”

www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/aug/03/trump-enemy-of-the-people-meaning-history

Leftists call Trump all sorts of disrespectful names and Trump calls disrespectful leftists names. They both claim that is their constitutional right, and that may be true.
 
Our lib communists are not attempting to use Article 5 so it does not matter to this topic. Instead they are treasonously trying to pretend the rest of Constitution was intended to be living or communist. If Founders had said to country Constitution is living and can grow into anything it would not have been ratified in one single state. Do you understand?

Baloney!

BTW, un-American, hatred is showing.
 
It comes under “promote the general welfare”.

promote the general welfare was not written to negate the enumerated powers was it? 1+1=2
 
Baloney is not a reason. Does the liberal even know a reason is necessary?

Here's what you wrote:

Our lib communists are not attempting to use Article 5 so it does not matter to this topic.

We are … ok … were talking about the Constitution being a living document, in which case Article V absolutely applies. I don't know any "lib communists" or what they are attempting. I only know AmeriCANs.


Instead they are treasonously trying to pretend the rest of Constitution was intended to be living or communist.

IBID

If Founders had said to country Constitution is living and can grow into anything it would not have been ratified in one single state.

Probably but you have no way to prove that. …. Do you understand? :2rofll:

promote the general welfare was not written to negate the enumerated powers was it?

I didn't say it was.


Yes, jimmy, I'm sure your parents are so proud you can add 1 and 1; good boy!
 
We are … ok … were talking about the Constitution being a living document, in which case Article V absolutely applies. I don't know any "lib communists" or what they are attempting. I only know AmeriCANs.

so tell us what libcommies are making a serious effort to change the Constitution with an amendment?? what is the Amendment? Do you understand now?
 
Probably but you have no way to prove that( ratification was about size/power/scope of new government). …. Do you understand? :2rofll:
!

I know what ratification debates were about and you apparently know nothing whatsoever? Why not look it up and tell us if states we worried mostly about losing too much power to a liberal central govt? Isn't learning fun?
 
so tell us what libcommies are making a serious effort to change the Constitution with an amendment??

I don't know of any proposed Constitutional Amendments, at present. You're the one claiming some group you're calling "libcommies" are trying to change the Constitution.

what is the Amendment?

Good question, what amendment or law or whatever your point is … how are these libcommies trying to change the Constitution or American law?


I know what ratification debates were about and you apparently know nothing whatsoever?

I at least knew that our Constitution limits the scope of government … not size. I've read the Federalist Papers so I DO know a bit about ratification.

Isn't learning fun?Why not look it up and tell us if states we worried mostly about losing too much power

I don't need to look it up, they absolutely were.

to a liberal central govt?

There you go again, Liberal or Conservative wasn't their concern, they were most concerned about States Rights; you've been listening to too much Rush.

Isn't learning fun?

Yes, I've always found it so, just think how much fun it will be when you get to 2+2.
 
The title is very misleading. This has nothing to do with the constitution.
It's the never ending I really, really, really hate President Trump. Back to comparing him to
Stalin, Mao and Nazi propagandists. Still reeling from November 2016 and it now seems
they will never return to a normal state.

Trump does suck. And, pretty much everyone with a functioning brain knows this.
 
Back
Top Bottom