One person/one vote is now a sacred principle of American democracy and has been so for a long time now. You trying to deny it is a denial of obvious reality.
Stop lecturing me about your dreams. Your argument is based on what you wish to be, not the reality nor the purpose clearly explained for the Electoral College.
Again, it is quite shocking that somebody pretending to intelligently discuss the EC system is not aware of basic arithmetic of the system. If a candidate wins each of the eleven largest states by a single vote in each of them - but is not even on the ballot in the other 39 states, they win the Electoral College. The system allows this.
Already explained to you. The "system" allows the STATE's to decide how they wish to award their Electoral College votes. 48 STATE's have decided on the "winner-take-all" option that you are talking about. Two STATE's use a proportional system, i.e. the winner of the popular vote in each Representative District get that Electoral vote, and the two Senator electoral votes go to the candidate who got the most popular votes.
If you don't like your State's system, lobby your State government to choose a different method. :shrug:
And even if you are 100% right - which you are obviously not - it ignores the reality that when the EC met in the states to cast their votes, there was plenty of very public speculation about Russian help given to Trump in the election. The very thing Hamilton warned about in Federalist 68 and the very thing Hamilton promised the American people they would be protected from.
1. Simply saying "obviously" without any FACTUAL evidence to show your "obvious" point is valid is an appeal to popularity and just your opinion.
2. The EC's job is to vote the way their State has determined they are required to vote. They can only be "unfaithful" if there is a FACTUAL basis on which to make a case. Allegations of wrongdoing are simply that...ALLEGATIONS. It does not matter that YOU and other's might think Russian electioneering efforts could have helped Trump win. Citizens STILL VOTED per each State's legal mechanism as they chose to.
That second point is the real problem with both your and the most of this Administrations opponent's arguments, and also give's the lie to claims it wasn't the election result that raises objections but rather his actions as President. YOU clearly believe, as do most people typically labeled TDS sufferers, that the election was STOLEN unfairly. That Trump was never elected honestly.
You use the E.C. as an excuse knowing full well you would not be complaining if your expectations were met with Hillary's election.
You use the Russian's as an excuse to explain this "mistake." That Trump's would never have won without their assistance.
Yet he's maintain the same or greater level of popular support all this time despite every effort from the Left, RINO's, the MSM, and the "Deep State's" Russian conspiracy investigation which should show you that those who voted for Trump voted because they wanted him elected, not because some Russian "bots" convinced them.
So you keep going down that fantasy trail, knowing as you do you have the support of like-minded individual...but not the support of those who despite all this still DON'T buy your viewpoint.
Always remember, you have your "one person, one vote" in State elections and also for your Congress-critters in both Houses, but until something changes drastically the President is still elected by a system to insure he governs on behalf of sovereign States that supported his election. I support that idea as a way to keep these States "United" and not subject to the will of the large city "mobs".