• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

We have a Second Amendment. Why do we have any security problems in our free States?

danielpalos said:
So, there should be no security problems in our free States.
Click to expand...

Well, as none of them are being occupied or invaded by a foreign power, nor suffering rebellion, nor under tyranny, there aren't any.
 
danielpalos said:
Let's end our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror; to lower our tax burden.
Click to expand...

What is "a response having nothing to do with what I said"?
 
danielpalos said:
I thought you said our States had no problems.
Click to expand...

No, I said they had no security problems within the meaning of the Second Amendment. Whatever YOU think "security" means is inoperative.
 
Harshaw said:
No, I said they had no security problems within the meaning of the Second Amendment. Whatever YOU think "security" means is inoperative.
Click to expand...

Why do we have alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror; that the right wing refuses to pay for with wartime tax rates?
 
danielpalos said:
Why do we have alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror; that the right wing refuses to pay for with wartime tax rates?
Click to expand...

I give up. Why?
 
danielpalos said:
We should not need "wars on crime, drugs, or terror". The right wing doesn't like it, because it requires more than just talk.
Click to expand...

And how does that relate to militias? Neither of those things are within the duties of militia. Crime and drugs is a law enforcement problem and terror is both lsw enforcement and military. The militia acts as a defensive force that deals with things within the nation.
 
Maccabee said:
And how does that relate to militias? Neither of those things are within the duties of militia. Crime and drugs is a law enforcement problem and terror is both lsw enforcement and military. The militia acts as a defensive force that deals with things within the nation.
Click to expand...

are you on the right wing?

Well regulated militia are necessary to the security of a free State.
 
danielpalos said:
We have a Second Amendment. We should not need to mooch federal dollars for alleged wars on crime, drugs, or terror; especially when the right wing refuses to pay wartime tax rates for them.
Click to expand...
How does the second amendment tie into this?
 
danielpalos said:
We have a Second Amendment. We should not need to mooch federal dollars for alleged wars on crime, drugs, or terror; especially when the right wing refuses to pay wartime tax rates for them.
Click to expand...

Your second sentence here has absolutely nothing to do with your first.
 
danielpalos said:
Yes, it does. The right wing claims we need to reduce welfare spending not warfare spending.
Click to expand...

Wow. You're getting further and further away.
 
Harshaw said:
No. You have a bevy of non-sequiturs.
Click to expand...

lol. you have nothing but fallacy. that is why you claim, i have non-sequiturs.

A well regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free State. Why are we wasting the (other) Peoples' tax monies on alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror?
 
What does the second Amendment REALLY mean?

Whatever those 9 people on the SC say it means.

Nothing else matters.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom