• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Regulate appears 3 times in the constitution. One time is guns.

Status
Not open for further replies.
And this thread, is just one more reason why we should just acknowledge the new normal. The right to life of a child, of a mother, a father, is less important than the right of a person to possess a firearm. That is what it boils down to. Unless someone can figure out something else that can pass congress.
 
Bark said:
A tank kills people. And blows up things. A tank with no firing pin is a hover round. You know why it is a hover round? Cause its gun was neutered. RIGHT?
Click to expand...


What does that have to do with the ignorant statement "So they switched to guns, knowing there would never be any regulations on them." ?
 
Fledermaus said:
WTH does that have to do with firearms?

Walk down the street yelling ****, ****, ****. Will you get far? no.

Walk down the street naked. Will you get far? no.

Walk down the middle of the street yelling. Will you get far? no.

None of that has to do with guns....
Click to expand...

Here let me make it simple. You have arms. Not your appendages, but a term called arms. The second says something about arms. That means things that hurt people. Can I stop and move on to a better debater or should I continue?
 
Bark said:
Here let me make it simple. You have arms. Not your appendages, but a term called arms. The second says something about arms. That means things that hurt people. Can I stop and move on to a better debater or should I continue?
Click to expand...

You are not addressing the fact you were wrong about arms being regulated and ignorant in your statement "So they switched to guns, knowing there would never be any regulations on them." ?

18 U.S. Code Chapter 44 - FIREARMS
 
Bark said:
I dunno other only is money and trade and both those seem really important to me. Kind of fundamental.
Click to expand...

You probably ought to read the 2nd before posting. It's short and concise. You can use an online dictionary for the big words.
 
jimbo said:
You probably ought to read the 2nd before posting. It's short and concise. You can use an online dictionary for the big words.
Click to expand...

I know it well lady!
 
Fledermaus said:
You are not addressing the fact you were wrong about arms being regulated and ignorant in your statement "So they switched to guns, knowing there would never be any regulations on them." ?

18 U.S. Code Chapter 44 - FIREARMS
Click to expand...

Fine man do your own work.
 
Fledermaus said:
What does that have to do with the ignorant statement "So they switched to guns, knowing there would never be any regulations on them." ?
Click to expand...

laws and dang five character limits. Laws is only four your rocket scientist.
 
fledermaus said:
wth does that have to do with firearms?

Walk down the street yelling ****, ****, ****. Will you get far? No.

Walk down the street naked. Will you get far? No.

Walk down the middle of the street yelling. Will you get far? No.

None of that has to do with guns....
Click to expand...

correct! Especially the regulated part!
 
Fledermaus said:
Do what work? I showed you were ignorant about firearms and regulations.... Consider it a job well done.
Click to expand...

No you didn't! bring up numbers or stats. Stories, etc. You yelled how you fell you dip stick. Never confuse that for reality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom