• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Does Constitution make liberalism illegal?

LOL call it whatever you want... it's all socialism at the end of the day (but you wouldn't know anything about that)

So no rebuttal then?

That's what I thought.
Being willfully ignorant is not thinking
 
Six words and a meme? Do you suppose I am going to take you seriously with a response like that?

Perhaps try challenging my "allegations" against Hitler and stop attacking the messenger.

When in doubt, and devoid of facts, the liberal left targets and personally attacks the messenger.

*ding *ding *ding We've got a winner! LOL

No rebuttal? That's what I thought.

Being wilfully ignorant is not thinking
 
There are plenty, and you, Night Ranger, are in charge of nothing.

You simply sit with James on a throne of lies.
 
in that case, we are to promote the general welfare until we have sufficient metrics to define it. metadata for the general welfare not the general warfare!

You and "general" versus "common"

Until you can prove you know what these terms mean by giving an example of what would be a "general" policy versus what would be a "common" policy, please stop regurgitating this meaningless drivel.
 
Think about this for a second. Alternatively, you may leave the forum now.

Or should, until such times as you're studied constitutional matters sufficiently

Why did Hitler kill 8 million Jews?


Where's your source for 8 million ?

The Holocaust was a pretty conservative policy wouldn't you say, hardly libertarian


And in one of his last interviews, Mussolini re-affirmed his status as a socialist, so there is no explanation you can provide that will counter this argument.

Source ?

And what socialist policies did Mussolini have ?

...National Socialist Party? NO...… they were anything but socialists!

Correct, the name (National Socialist and German Workers Party - NSDAP) was to broaden their appeal to German workers in the post First World War era

The fought the socialist of the Social Democratic Party and the communists in the streets of Germany


Or about the 200 quotes of Hitler saying that the Nazis were national socialists...

What quotes
What "socialist" policies when Hitler was in power
Was there any state ownership of banks, industrial companies etc ?

The term NAZI was an acronym for National Socialist Party....

No it was short for NSDAP - see above. The name was a misnomer and intended to broaden the appeal of the infant party. I am guessing you have never studied politics and couldn't define the Corporate State.


Hitler did not believe in freedom and free enterprise.


Was not the Mercedes car company a free enterprise ?
How about the Krupp Steel Company ?
Or the Rheinmetall Company ?

He preferred everyone walk lockstep, like cogs in the machine, like the American Democrat party....


OMG there's the problem...you're a rabid Republican
The US Democrat party is a capitalist party, the nationalistic party the shares most similarities with the Nazis is the Republican party


This required big government control over all aspects of life.

Excluding the military, Hitlers peacetime government was SMALL


They commandeered businesses.

No they didn't. The Nazi's expelled Jews through ultra conservative racial policies and that meant Jewish property was seized


The inflated National superego; superior race, was based on Social Darwinism; superior race and natural selection.

Ultra conservative policies

You see Trump do a milder version of this today without the overt racism

What is "Social Darwinism" Btw ?


This inflated super ego was driven by the original fake news propaganda machine....

Sorry all of that is meaningless drivel


Yes they were ultra nationalists, ultra conservatives


If you watch fake news, presuming Trump guilt...


Yaaaaawn

You're just another Nuremberg-esqe Trump Republican rally goer. The Nazis had their brown shirts, Trump has his MAGA hats.


Next you'll say Trump is a good president instead of the absolute worst ever, an outright criminal and totally unfit for any public office.
 
So, are we on the same page now? Are you going to admit that calling Hitler is anything but a socialist is a blatant miscarriage of justice?

Hitler was not a socialist, never uttered a word promoting socialist practices and when in power never enacted any socialist policies.

QED: Hitler was no socialist - he was in bed with German capitalists.
 
You and "general" versus "common"

Until you can prove you know what these terms mean by giving an example of what would be a "general" policy versus what would be a "common" policy, please stop regurgitating this meaningless drivel.

General must cover any contingency. It is not the Limited welfare or the common welfare.

The Common welfare pertains to the Common law, via that branch of Government.
 
General must cover any contingency. It is not the Limited welfare or the common welfare.

The Common welfare pertains to the Common law, via that branch of Government.

That is meaningless drivel

Give an example of what a "common" welfare policy would be versus an example of what a "general" welfare policy would be.

You can't

Because you really don't understand what the terms actually mean.
 
Rich2018 rules the dummies on the right.
 
That is meaningless drivel

Give an example of what a "common" welfare policy would be versus an example of what a "general" welfare policy would be.

You can't

Because you really don't understand what the terms actually mean.

lol. solving simple poverty via market friendly means could be legislated by the legislature in a general manner.
 
Being willfully ignorant is not thinking

Six words and a meme... can't get much worse than that in terms of pure ignorance. Considering my initial response was well over three pages long.
 
Where's your source for 8 million ?
The Holocaust was a pretty conservative policy wouldn't you say, hardly libertarian

Source is about the average of what you will hear from both the left and the right give or take a couple million. In any event, Hilter decided to exterminate the Jews for apparently no reason...(There is more to that statement but I'm doubting you'll be able to pick up on it.)

Conservative policy? When was the last time conservative policy ended in genocide? Might want to look at the genocides associated with socialism first. Abortion? legal liberal genocide.

View attachment 67272331

Source ?

And what socialist policies did Mussolini have ?

Derrr.. Italy was socialist before it was fascist and Mussolini was their leader in both cases. There was and is no question that Italy was a socialist state under his direction. There is no doubt about it. Fascism was borne out of socialism.

Mussolini was also a leading member of the National Directorate of the Italian Socialist Party at one time.

The facts are indisputable: We have it from the horses mouth that Mussolini was a socialist both before and after his stint with fascism. Ergo, it would have been impossible for fascism to be a right wing, conservative ideology. Unless of course if Mussolini was a socialist who had a political conversion that flipped his entire political perception to right wing, and then, when he was done with that, had another spiritual awakening and renounced his new found love of conservative right wing politics to become a socialist again.

But that's impossible too.

Because Mussolini's quote clearly states that he was socialist in the past and a socialist in the present. And he then goes on to scold people for thinking is personal ideology had ever "wavered" at any point (making any attempt to argue he switched parties and ideologies preposterous.) So there was no flip flop after all. Thereby making it impossible for fascism to be a right wing ideology.

Any rational thinking human being knows there is no rebuttal to this evidence.

As quoted in “Soliloquy for ‘freedom’ Trimellone island”, on the Italian Island of Trimelone, journalist Ivanoe Fossani, one of the last interviews of Mussolini, March 20, 1945, from Opera omnia, vol. 32. Interview is also known as "Testament of Benito Mussolini.


Correct, the name (National Socialist and German Workers Party - NSDAP) was to broaden their appeal to German workers in the post First World War era

Sure, what ever you say. But there is another piece of evidence you are going to have to worm your way out of: The "Workers Party" phrase was used exclusively by socialist/communist political parties at that time. So that's two references to socialism in their name alone! Don't believe me? Try finding a single political party with "workers party" in their name that WASNT SOCIALIST OR COMMUNIST.

They fought the socialist of the Social Democratic Party and the communists in the streets of Germany
But you forgot to clarify: It wasn't the socialist/communist population of the nation that was targeted, it was the competing political parties in Germany that Hitler saw as a major threat to his power. So he rounded up all their leadership and had them killed to eliminate any political upset.

continued
 
What quotes
What "socialist" policies when Hitler was in power
Was there any state ownership of banks, industrial companies etc ?

The only arguments against Hitler's government being anything but socialist usually revolve around the privatized economy that Germany had in those days and claiming this as evidence against socialism. But what people fail to remember is that Germany's economy under the Nazi regime was privatized in name only. Production and demand was enforced with the barrel of a gun, if needed. Effectively making owners nothing more than office managers. Couple this with Hitler's love of fascism and it becomes clear exactly what they were doing with the economy, and it had nothing to do with legitimate capitalism.

No it was short for NSDAP - see above. The name was a misnomer and intended to broaden the appeal of the infant party. I am guessing you have never studied politics and couldn't define the Corporate State.

The term "Nazi" was not a misnomer, and there was no effort to broaden the appeal by calling themselves socialists when they actually weren't.

The word Nazi is short for Nationalsozialist (supporter of the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei) in the German language. This means "National Socialist German Workers' Party".


Was not the Mercedes car company a free enterprise ?
How about the Krupp Steel Company ?
Or the Rheinmetall Company ?

All manufacturing and production in Germany was managed by the Nazi party, so no, at that time those businesses were nothing close to being free enterprise.

No they didn't. The Nazi's expelled Jews through ultra conservative racial policies and that meant Jewish property was seized

But why on earth did they want to kill the Jews?

Ultra conservative policies

You see Trump do a milder version of this today without the overt racism

What is "Social Darwinism" Btw ?

Trump is doing nothing of the kind.

The definition of social Darwinism: the theory that individuals, groups, and peoples are subject to the same Darwinian laws of natural selection as plants and animals. Now largely discredited, social Darwinism was advocated by Herbert Spencer and others in the late 19th and early 20th centuries and was used to justify political conservatism, imperialism, and racism and to discourage intervention and reform.


Sorry all of that is meaningless drivel

Next you'll say Trump is a good president instead of the absolute worst ever, an outright criminal and totally unfit for any public office.

Obama was the worst president in History. Trump is second only to Lincoln and a select few (who were all conservatives, by the way)
 
The only arguments against Hitler's government being anything but socialist usually revolve around the privatized economy that Germany had in those days and claiming this as evidence against socialism. But what people fail to remember is that Germany's economy under the Nazi regime was privatized in name only. Production and demand was enforced with the barrel of a gun, if needed. Effectively making owners nothing more than office managers. Couple this with Hitler's love of fascism and it becomes clear exactly what they were doing with the economy, and it had nothing to do with legitimate capitalism.



The term "Nazi" was not a misnomer, and there was no effort to broaden the appeal by calling themselves socialists when they actually weren't.

The word Nazi is short for Nationalsozialist (supporter of the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei) in the German language. This means "National Socialist German Workers' Party".




All manufacturing and production in Germany was managed by the Nazi party, so no, at that time those businesses were nothing close to being free enterprise.



But why on earth did they want to kill the Jews?



Trump is doing nothing of the kind.

The definition of social Darwinism: the theory that individuals, groups, and peoples are subject to the same Darwinian laws of natural selection as plants and animals. Now largely discredited, social Darwinism was advocated by Herbert Spencer and others in the late 19th and early 20th centuries and was used to justify political conservatism, imperialism, and racism and to discourage intervention and reform.




Obama was the worst president in History. Trump is second only to Lincoln and a select few (who were all conservatives, by the way)

First, I think the stable genius would rank himself above Lincoln. Second, saying it doesn’t make it so. Obama had the Iran deal with our allies, millions more insured and the GOP now on board, as merely wanting to replace it with something supposedly better, the Paris agreement, and the respect of the world. In one of Trumps first speeches before international representatives they laughed at him after his first few words.

But Trump did break with tradition and proposed that US forces commit war crimes, and pardoned those who had. You can take comfort in that.
 
First, I think the stable genius would rank himself above Lincoln. Second, saying it doesn’t make it so. Obama had the Iran deal with our allies, millions more insured and the GOP now on board, as merely wanting to replace it with something supposedly better, the Paris agreement, and the respect of the world. In one of Trumps first speeches before international representatives they laughed at him after his first few words.

But Trump did break with tradition and proposed that US forces commit war crimes, and pardoned those who had. You can take comfort in that.

This coming from a guy who is 100% brainwashed.

When was the last time your got your news from anyone other than the liberal media?
 
Six words and a meme... can't get much worse than that in terms of pure ignorance. Considering my initial response was well over three pages long.

Yup pure ignorance from anyone who claims fascism is left wing
there is no other explanation
 
Yup pure ignorance from anyone who claims fascism is left wing
there is no other explanation

I can't believe I am humoring this depravity but so be it.

Fascism was defined by what politician? In other words, who invented fascism?
 
I can't believe I am humoring this depravity but so be it.

Fascism was defined by what politician? In other words, who invented fascism?

Mussolini as you well know
What you forget (ie remain intentionally ignorant about) is that he left socialism founded fascism and attacked socialism
By your moronic non thinking illogic George Washington was a loyalist to the British cause because he once served in the British army

Ae you a sock for James? Because you see as miseducated on literally every topic as he is.
If not the education system is in far worse shape than anyone ever thought
 
I can't believe I am humoring this depravity but so be it.

Fascism was defined by what politician? In other words, who invented fascism?


Fascism was not "invented" by a single person. There were several philosophers, academics, politicians, and even a poet who may be viewed as forerunners of the philosophy of fascism. In late 19th century France, Charles Maurras and George Sorel's works influenced various individuals in France, Germany and Italy. Enrico Corradini and Tommaso Marinetti expanded upon the thoughts of Maurras and Sorel. With the outbreak of war in 1914, German sociologist Johann Plenge spoke of the rise of a "National Socialism", fusing together the ideas of the French and Italians and attacking the philosophy of the French Revolution which had promoted the ideas of rights of man, democracy, individualism and liberalism Plenge believed that racial solidarity (Volksgemeinschaft) and the true "German values" of duty, discipline, law and order would replace class division and that "racial comrades" would unite.

Hitler opened the first concentration camp in Feb 1933, not for those of the Jewish faith but for "political opponents", which included liberals, communists, socialists and labour organizers. Funny, don't you think, that the first people persecuted by the Nazis were what one might label as "leftists".

I do wonder if Jonah Goldberg's silly little book Liberal Fascism is the source for your views on fascism.
 
especially since Mussolini and HItler were a left wing socialists for huge government and since our left wing spied for Stalin and HItler and since Sanders honeymooned in the USSR and loved it there and since Deblazio honeymooned in Cuba and Nicaragua, and since Green NEw Deal is as fascist as you can get!!.


-Guy Tugwell: (FDR Brain Trust) said of fascism: "It's the cleanest, neatest piece...of social machinery I've ever seen." ( page 11)

jimmie - when you provide a quote, you should also give us a link to the site you copied from.

"( page 11 )"??
 
Sorry conservatives, traditionalists or patriots, whatever you call yourselves. You're not getting your slaves back.
 
lol. solving simple poverty via market friendly means could be legislated by the legislature in a general manner.


You keep saying that but you're unable to give an example of a "general" welfare policy versus what would be an example of a "common" welfare policy.

Until you can, why do you keep posting meaningless statements that you don't understand ?
 
Source is about the average of what you will hear from both the left and the right give or take a couple million...

So your "source" is not only hearsay, it's just what you've heard and you have absolutely no credible data you can point to ?

Your attachment doesn't work Btw


...Hilter decided to exterminate the Jews for apparently no reason...

You mean not "apparent" to you with your HIGHLY limited knowlege based on popular myth and hearsay rather than knowledge?

Conservative policy? When was the last time conservative policy ended in genocide? Might want to look at the genocides associated with socialism first. Abortion? legal liberal genocide.


...Italy was socialist before it was fascist and Mussolini was their leader in both cases....

Please can you give examples of Musso,lini's "socialist" policies that prove Italy was a socialist county under his government ?

So far your postings have been devoid of any sources to back up your claims

The facts are indisputable...

Then can you give a source to these facts to back up your unsubstantiated claims - what policies did Mussolini have that marked him out as leading a socialist government ?


Any rational thinking human being knows there is no rebuttal to this evidence....

What "evidence"

I'm not intesrested in your revisionist historical claims but your sources, of which you've not given any.

Sure, what ever you say. But there is another piece of evidence you are going to have to worm your way out of: The "Workers Party" phrase was used exclusively by socialist/communist political parties at that time....

As I told you, the NSDAP, called themselves "National Socialists" to broaden their electoral appeal, not because the had any or supported any socialist policies. They did not. What you think think you know is wrong as your futile attempts to search the "Net are probably telling you.

In fact quite the reverse and their bully-boys (the SA) fought the German socialist and communist parties' supporters in the streets.


...it wasn't the socialist/communist population of the nation that was targeted, it was the competing political parties in Germany that Hitler saw as a major threat to his power. So he rounded up all their leadership and had them killed to eliminate any political upset....

The Nazis fought for control over the streets in Germany to gain power.

Do you even know what you're talking about? Would it be the Night of the Long Knives when the Nazis curbed the power of the SA which was over 3 million strong ? They settled some scores and some people were killed. Chief amongst them was Ernst Rohm.
What are you referring to when you claim the Nazis "rounded up" political opponents ?

The only arguments against Hitler's government being anything but socialist usually revolve around the privatized economy that Germany had in those days....

Well the existence of a private sector economy would give lie to the claim that Nazi Germany was "socialist"

...production and demand was enforced with the barrel of a gun...

Where did you invent this claim from?

Source please - though your posts are devoid of any references so nobody will be holding their breath


All manufacturing and production in Germany was managed by the Nazi party...

No it wasn't
You really don't know anything do you ?

Source please.

Trump is doing nothing of the kind.

Yes, he's stirring up nationalism like the Nazi did and creating a league of blind followers wrapping themselves in a stars and stripes flag. He even adorns them with a red baseball cap in lieu of a brown shirt.

The definition of social Darwinism: the theory that individuals, groups, and peoples are subject to the same Darwinian laws of natural selection as plants and animals....

Darwinism refers to how living things change over time - biologically. That's all.


Obama was the worst president in History. Trump is second only to Lincoln...

:lamo


Trump is 44th out of all 44 presidents as the absolute worst.

Obama was one of the best with JFK, FDR and probably Clinton.

Trump has been a total and absolute DISASTER as president (outside his own legion of MAGA hat wearing SA) which is why the world mocks and reviles him in equal measure.
 
Last edited:
Fascism was not "invented" by a single person. There were several philosophers, academics, politicians, and even a poet who may be viewed as forerunners of the philosophy of fascism. In late 19th century France, Charles Maurras and George Sorel's works influenced various individuals in France, Germany and Italy. Enrico Corradini and Tommaso Marinetti expanded upon the thoughts of Maurras and Sorel. With the outbreak of war in 1914, German sociologist Johann Plenge spoke of the rise of a "National Socialism", fusing together the ideas of the French and Italians and attacking the philosophy of the French Revolution which had promoted the ideas of rights of man, democracy, individualism and liberalism Plenge believed that racial solidarity (Volksgemeinschaft) and the true "German values" of duty, discipline, law and order would replace class division and that "racial comrades" would unite.

Hitler opened the first concentration camp in Feb 1933, not for those of the Jewish faith but for "political opponents", which included liberals, communists, socialists and labour organizers. Funny, don't you think, that the first people persecuted by the Nazis were what one might label as "leftists".

I do wonder if Jonah Goldberg's silly little book Liberal Fascism is the source for your views on fascism.

Mussolini is generally viewed as the father of Fascism.

Leftists love to point out that Hilter rounded up communists and socialists to offer up a very flawed example of why Fascism is a right wing ideology.

This couldn't be further from the truth. Hitler didn't target socialists or communists of the German population, he targeted the leadership of competing political parties in Germany that were a threat to his absolute authority.
 
Back
Top Bottom