• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Does Constitution make liberalism illegal?

You need not prove to everyone how uneducated you are we already know

can you say why you think that?? This is debate site you are supposed to have reasons and be able to put them in writing. 1+1=2
 
can you say why you think that?? This is debate site you are supposed to have reasons and be able to put them in writing. 1+1=2

Yeah pretty much everything you post.
My favorite was your post where you claimed Jesus taught Aristotle
But any post will do
 
Yeah pretty much everything you post.
My favorite was your post where you claimed Jesus taught Aristotle
But any post will do

Or subject is whether the Constitution made liberalism illegal. Any ideas at all???
 
Yeah pretty much everything you post.
My favorite was your post where you claimed Jesus taught Aristotle
But any post will do

My favorite idiocy of his is that the enumerated powers of Congress prohibit liberalism, communism, Nazism, socialism, fascism, atheism, and antidisestablishmentarianism. LOL
 
My favorite idiocy of his is that the enumerated powers of Congress prohibit liberalism, communism, Nazism, socialism, fascism, atheism, and antidisestablishmentarianism. LOL

can the liberal say why he thinks enumerated powers are consistent with communism?? THis is debate site after all.
 
can the liberal say why he thinks enumerated powers are consistent with communism?? THis is debate site after all.

I can, but I'll let you go first since it is your question to explain which enumerated power or powers make Communism or any other ism impossible and allow only for a representative republic.

I fear this will be a long, long wait.
 
Or subject is whether the Constitution made liberalism illegal. Any ideas at all???

Constitutional liberalism. Constitutional liberalism describes a form of government that upholds the principles of classical liberalism and the rule of law. It differs from liberal democracy in that it is not about the method of selecting government.
 
I can, but I'll let you go first since

for third time: Enumerated powers in our Constitution restrict central govt to a few powers while communism requires unlimited powers in central govt. Thus, communism is not possible or legal under our Constitution.

Was that simple enough??
 
here is subject which liberal is running from as fast as he can can:

the Constitution forbids all forms of big liberal govt whether monarchy or communism or national socialism. Our genius Founders saw them as identical for all intents and purposes. You have learned this 26 times now. Shall we go for 25?

The Constitution didn't say the enumerated powers apply only to monarchists but not to would-be communists. Notice when a conservative and liberal get together the conservative is made to feel like a kindergarten teacher.

How did our "genius Founders" see communism and national socialism governmental system as equivalent to an absolute monarchy? Neither communism or nazism existed in the 18th century -- oops, I have erred. There were communists back in those days, they were members of the multiple Catholic religious orders in which most members were treated equally, with equal support from the order. However, they were not Marxist Communists.

A conservative adult speaking to a 5 year old may feel like a kindergarten teacher, when speaking to a liberal with equivalent education, the situation is quite different - not that you will ever acknowledge such a reality.

jimmie, the only time you 'win' is when the inanity of your responses drive away commenters who grow tired of refuting your every claim all the while you claim to be winning.
 
How did our "genius Founders" see communism and national socialism governmental system as equivalent to an absolute monarchy?.

Hitler and Stalin were, for all intents and purposes, absolute monarchs while our genius Founders saw them many times in human history and so wanted individual liberty, the opposite of absolute monarchy.
 
Hitler and Stalin were, for all intents and purposes, absolute monarchs while our genius Founders saw them many times in human history and so wanted individual liberty, the opposite of absolute monarchy.

moving goalposts, jimmie -- not unexpected
 
moving goalposts, jimmie -- not unexpected

ever see a conservative have to run from a conversation?? What are you teaching us about liberalism??
 
for third time: Enumerated powers in our Constitution restrict central govt to a few powers while communism requires unlimited powers in central govt. Thus, communism is not possible or legal under our Constitution.

Was that simple enough??

For every complex question there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. (apologies to H.L. Mencken)
 
Or subject is whether the Constitution made liberalism illegal. Any ideas at all???

I have already stated that you need not prove that you are uneducated we already know.
 
ever see a conservative have to run from a conversation?? What are you teaching us about liberalism??

Actually, yes I have. Sometimes by ignoring responses - you. Sometimes by bringing up unrelated topics - you? And sometimes by moving goalposts - you?

What you are teaching us about SOME who call themselves conservative, is that the responses we all can read - except when the others have placed you on IGNORE - is a deep ignorance of history and modern politics, all the while claiming to have a deeper understanding than any you label as "Liberal".
 
a deep ignorance of history and modern politics,

.

well then why so afraid give us your best example of this?? What better way to make your point???????????
 
For every complex question there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. (apologies to H.L. Mencken)


or forth time: Enumerated powers in our Constitution restrict central govt to a few powers while communism requires unlimited powers in central govt. Thus, communism is not possible or legal under our Constitution.

Was that wrong? If so why so afraid to tell us why???
 
Actually, yes I have. Sometimes by ignoring responses - you. Sometimes by bringing up unrelated topics - you? And sometimes by moving goalposts - you?

What you are teaching us about SOME who call themselves conservative, is that the responses we all can read - except when the others have placed you on IGNORE - is a deep ignorance of history and modern politics, all the while claiming to have a deeper understanding than any you label as "Liberal".

I read you allege to being socialist. There is nothing at all voluntary about being socialist. It is imposed against the popular will.
 
or forth time: Enumerated powers in our Constitution restrict central govt to a few powers while communism requires unlimited powers in central govt. Thus, communism is not possible or legal under our Constitution.

Was that wrong? If so why so afraid to tell us why???

That appears accurate to me. What can he find wrong?

Your current typical American has not ever actually been inside communism to observe it in operation.

I my friends have been inside of communism. It is taught to the public using guns. America uses votes.
 
I read you allege to being socialist. There is nothing at all voluntary about being socialist. It is imposed against the popular will.

yes somer is a socialist. conservatives/libertarians want free voluntary and peaceful relationships among people while socialists want all relationships conducted at gunpoint!!No wonder socialism just killed 200 million.
 
It is taught to the public using guns. America uses votes.

Good Point!!! It will take 400 million dead before liberals realize government violence does not work and freedom does.
 
Good Point!!! It will take 400 million dead before liberals realize government violence does not work and freedom does.

Talk to George Bush and his war of choice in Iraq if you are talking about violence and dead soldiers and citizens.
 
Sure it does by restricting our government to a very few enumerated powers.

Does Constitution make liberalism illegal? An incredible stupid question. The Constitution doesn't deal in politics and there are millions of liberals that are not being tried for treason or in jail.


Incredibly ignorant answer. The "government" meaning the people you elect to Congress are not restricted to a few enumerated powers. Congress is empowered to use all the enumerated powers and they actually have nothing to do with liberals or conservatives or restricting government.
 
The Constitution doesn't deal in politics.

With enumerated powers and Bill of Rights, Constitution deals with politics by strictly limiting size of government so, in effect, makes liberalism illegal and conservatism the law of the land. This is why liberals hate Constitution, spied for Hitler and Stalin, and love Sanders Warren Buttajudge.
 
The "government" meaning the people you elect to Congress are not restricted to a few enumerated powers.

so that would mean they are not restricted by Constitution?????????????
 
Back
Top Bottom