ChrisABrown
Active member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2017
- Messages
- 254
- Reaction score
- 19
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
You say you’re new and you’re posting on a freedom of speech post.
But here on this forum you don’t have freedom of speech, you can’t call someone stupid, or other commonly used words during your debates, the moderator will give you a warning.
What ever happened to the old saying
Sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me.
Our rights slowly eroding away.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well said MrShangles! The intent of these threads here are to create an understanding of the ultimate PURPOSE of free speech so Americans can unify to preserve the constitution.
That preservation will amount to using Article V, FIRSTLY using a method that we should call "Preparatory Amendment", because by no means is anyone prepared to assure that all amendments have constitutional intent as Article V requires. AND, the 9th amendment guarantees us rights retained, but not listed. So, with regard to the previous sentences, it is logical that Americans have retained the right to prepare for Article V to assure all amendments have constitutional intent. I consider the proposal to be hyper-constitutional and quite vital to an orderly "altering or abolishing" through Article V and amendment.
Preparation would consist of revision of the 1st Amendment in a way that would make it possible for a Citizen to share info critical to stopping the destruction of unalienable rights across the entire nation as quickly as possible. MSM has proven they will not, and we suffer dynamically from that. We don't even know how bad we are hurt yet. The second preparation would be to secure the vote across the states.
Both of these would require the states to amend their constitutions to be consistent with each other and the amended federal constitution.
BTW, ending the abridging of the PURPOSE of free speech would include return of the usenet. Are you aware of what that was, how it worked and what it meant to us?